IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v228y2018icp487-498.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability of integrated energy systems: A performance-based resilience assessment methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Moslehi, Salim
  • Reddy, T. Agami

Abstract

One of the key elements of any community or facility is the integrated energy system (IES) which consists of utility power plants, distributed generation systems, and building heating and cooling systems. Assessing the sustainability of an IES would be of great value to decision-making relevant to design, future growth planning, and operation of such systems. This paper addresses one of the basic issues in this regard, i.e. resilience assessment and quantification of IES. A new performance-based method for characterizing and assessing resilience of multi-functional demand-side engineered systems is proposed in this study. Through modeling of system response to potential internal and external failures (called failure modes) during different operational temporal periods (such as different diurnal and seasonal periods of the year), the proposed methodology quantifies resilience of the system based upon loss in the services which the system is designed to deliver. A three-dimensional matrix, called Loss Matrix, is introduced whose elements represent the undelivered system services under different scenarios, i.e. combinations of failure modes and different operational temporal periods. Assigning monetary penalty costs to such losses and including them in the objective function of an optimization model of the entire system allows the three-dimension loss matrix to be reframed into a two-dimensional Consequence Matrix where individual elements represent the imposed penalty costs to the system stakeholders due to undelivered services and/or non-optimal system performance. Normalizing the individual elements results in the Resilience Matrix of the system for different scenarios. The developed methodology is illustrated for IES of a large office building serves to satisfy critical and noncritical electrical, heating, and cooling loads. The resilience assessment framework proposed in this paper would serve as a mean to identify critical components of a particular IES, thereby facilitating resilient design and operation, and also to evaluate cost-effective resilience enhancement strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Moslehi, Salim & Reddy, T. Agami, 2018. "Sustainability of integrated energy systems: A performance-based resilience assessment methodology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 487-498.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:228:y:2018:i:c:p:487-498
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261918309401
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ouyang, Min & Wang, Zhenghua, 2015. "Resilience assessment of interdependent infrastructure systems: With a focus on joint restoration modeling and analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 74-82.
    2. Pipattanasomporn, Manisa & Feroze, Hassan & Rahman, Saifur, 2012. "Securing critical loads in a PV-based microgrid with a multi-agent system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 166-174.
    3. Ouyang, Min, 2017. "A mathematical framework to optimize resilience of interdependent critical infrastructure systems under spatially localized attacks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1072-1084.
    4. Mousavizadeh, Saeed & Haghifam, Mahmoud-Reza & Shariatkhah, Mohammad-Hossein, 2018. "A linear two-stage method for resiliency analysis in distribution systems considering renewable energy and demand response resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 443-460.
    5. Mark Turnquist & Eric Vugrin, 2013. "Design for resilience in infrastructure distribution networks," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 104-120, March.
    6. Stephanie E. Chang & Timothy McDaniels & Jana Fox & Rajan Dhariwal & Holly Longstaff, 2014. "Toward Disaster‐Resilient Cities: Characterizing Resilience of Infrastructure Systems with Expert Judgments," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(3), pages 416-434, March.
    7. Matelli, José Alexandre & Goebel, Kai, 2018. "Conceptual design of cogeneration plants under a resilient design perspective: Resilience metrics and case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 736-750.
    8. Anna Bozza & Domenico Asprone & Gaetano Manfredi, 2015. "Developing an integrated framework to quantify resilience of urban systems against disasters," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(3), pages 1729-1748, September.
    9. David L. Alderson & Gerald G. Brown & W. Matthew Carlyle, 2015. "Operational Models of Infrastructure Resilience," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 35(4), pages 562-586, April.
    10. LaCommare, Kristina Hamachi & Eto, Joseph H., 2006. "Cost of power interruptions to electricity consumers in the United States (US)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(12), pages 1845-1855.
    11. Eric D. Vugrin & Mark A. Turnquist & Nathanael J.K. Brown, 2014. "Optimal recovery sequencing for enhanced resilience and service restoration in transportation networks," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3/4), pages 218-246.
    12. Lin, Yanling & Bie, Zhaohong, 2018. "Tri-level optimal hardening plan for a resilient distribution system considering reconfiguration and DG islanding," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 1266-1279.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corinne Curt & Jean‐Marc Tacnet, 2018. "Resilience of Critical Infrastructures: Review and Analysis of Current Approaches," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2441-2458, November.
    2. Liu, Xing & Fang, Yi-Ping & Zio, Enrico, 2021. "A Hierarchical Resilience Enhancement Framework for Interdependent Critical Infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Jingjing Kong & Slobodan P. Simonovic, 2019. "Probabilistic Multiple Hazard Resilience Model of an Interdependent Infrastructure System," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(8), pages 1843-1863, August.
    4. Das, Laya & Munikoti, Sai & Natarajan, Balasubramaniam & Srinivasan, Babji, 2020. "Measuring smart grid resilience: Methods, challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    5. Bellè, Andrea & Abdin, Adam F. & Fang, Yi-Ping & Zeng, Zhiguo & Barros, Anne, 2023. "A data-driven distributionally robust approach for the optimal coupling of interdependent critical infrastructures under random failures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 872-889.
    6. Xiaoge Zhang & Sankaran Mahadevan & Kai Goebel, 2019. "Network Reconfiguration for Increasing Transportation System Resilience Under Extreme Events," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 2054-2075, September.
    7. Fang, Yi-Ping & Zio, Enrico, 2019. "An adaptive robust framework for the optimization of the resilience of interdependent infrastructures under natural hazards," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 276(3), pages 1119-1136.
    8. Ghorbani-Renani, Nafiseh & González, Andrés D. & Barker, Kash & Morshedlou, Nazanin, 2020. "Protection-interdiction-restoration: Tri-level optimization for enhancing interdependent network resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    9. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. Xu, Min & Ouyang, Min & Hong, Liu & Mao, Zijun & Xu, Xiaolin, 2022. "Resilience-driven repair sequencing decision under uncertainty for critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    11. Yifan Yang & S. Thomas Ng & Frank J. Xu & Martin Skitmore & Shenghua Zhou, 2019. "Towards Resilient Civil Infrastructure Asset Management: An Information Elicitation and Analytical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-24, August.
    12. Chen, Sai & Ding, Yueting & Song, Yan & Zhang, Ming & Nie, Rui, 2023. "Study on China's energy system resilience under the scenarios of long-term shortage of imported oil," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    13. Wang, Yi & Rousis, Anastasios Oulis & Strbac, Goran, 2020. "On microgrids and resilience: A comprehensive review on modeling and operational strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    14. Gilani, Mohammad Amin & Kazemi, Ahad & Ghasemi, Mostafa, 2020. "Distribution system resilience enhancement by microgrid formation considering distributed energy resources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    15. Shang, Ce & Lin, Teng & Li, Canbing & Wang, Keyou & Ai, Qian, 2021. "Joining resilience and reliability evaluation against both weather and ageing causes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    16. Jingjing Kong & Slobodan P. Simonovic & Chao Zhang, 2019. "Resilience Assessment of Interdependent Infrastructure Systems: A Case Study Based on Different Response Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-31, November.
    17. Ruiying Li & Qiang Dong & Wenting Ma & Rui Kang, 2023. "A test-based methodology for the probabilistic assessment of system resilience under random disturbances," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 237(4), pages 671-685, August.
    18. Caputo, A.C. & Donati, L. & Salini, P., 2023. "Estimating resilience of manufacturing plants to physical disruptions: Model and application," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    19. Noah C. Dormady & Robert T. Greenbaum & Kim A. Young, 2021. "An experimental investigation of resilience decision making in repeated disasters," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 556-576, December.
    20. Liao, Shiwu & Yao, Wei & Han, Xingning & Fang, Jiakun & Ai, Xiaomeng & Wen, Jinyu & He, Haibo, 2019. "An improved two-stage optimization for network and load recovery during power system restoration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C), pages 265-275.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:228:y:2018:i:c:p:487-498. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.