IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v173y2016icp578-588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Storage capacity assessment of liquid fuels production by solar gasification in a packed bed reactor using a dynamic process model

Author

Listed:
  • Kaniyal, Ashok A.
  • van Eyk, Philip J.
  • Nathan, Graham J.

Abstract

The first multi-day performance analysis of the feasibility of integrating a packed bed, indirectly irradiated solar gasification reactor with a downstream FT liquids production facility is reported. Two fuel-loading scenarios were assessed. In one, the residual unconverted fuel at the end of a day is reused, while in the second, the residual fuel is discarded. To estimate a full year time-series of operation, a simplified statistical model was developed from short-period simulations of the 1-D heat transfer, devolatilisation and gasification chemistry model of a 150kWth packed bed reactor (based on the authors’ earlier work). The short time-series cover a variety of solar conditions to represent seasonal, diurnal and cloud-induced solar transience. Also assessed was the influence of increasing the solar flux incident at the emitter plate of the packed bed reactor on syngas production. The combination of the annual time-series and daily model of syngas production was found to represent reasonably the seasonal transience in syngas production. It was then used to estimate the minimum syngas storage volume required to maintain a stable flow-rate and composition of syngas to a FT reactor over a full year of operation. This found that, for an assumed heliostat field collection area of 1000m2, at least 64days of storage is required, under both the Residual Fuel Re-Use and Discard scenarios. This figure was not sensitive to the two solar sites assessed, Farmington, New Mexico or Tonopah Airport, Nevada. Increasing the heliostat field collection area from 1000 to 1500m2, led to an increase in the calculated daily rate of syngas throughput that could be maintained over a full year by 74%, to 5.9kmol/day. Importantly, a larger heliostat field collection area was calculated to reduce the required storage capacity to approximately halve 35days, which in absolute terms corresponds to 3.0tons of syngas. Nevertheless, a requirement for this capacity of storage suggests that the use of the packed bed solar gasification reactor for FT liquids production is unlikely to be viable without substantial changes to the design and operation of the reactor and/or downstream processing plant.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaniyal, Ashok A. & van Eyk, Philip J. & Nathan, Graham J., 2016. "Storage capacity assessment of liquid fuels production by solar gasification in a packed bed reactor using a dynamic process model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 578-588.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:173:y:2016:i:c:p:578-588
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.067
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261916305177
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.04.067?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meerman, J.C. & Ramírez, A. & Turkenburg, W.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2011. "Performance of simulated flexible integrated gasification polygeneration facilities. Part A: A technical-energetic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2563-2587, August.
    2. Nathan, G.J. & Battye, D.L. & Ashman, P.J., 2014. "Economic evaluation of a novel fuel-saver hybrid combining a solar receiver with a combustor for a solar power tower," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1235-1243.
    3. Nithyanandam, K. & Pitchumani, R., 2014. "Cost and performance analysis of concentrating solar power systems with integrated latent thermal energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 793-810.
    4. Wu, Junjie & Hou, Hongjuan & Yang, Yongping & Hu, Eric, 2015. "Annual performance of a solar aided coal-fired power generation system (SACPG) with various solar field areas and thermal energy storage capacity," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 123-133.
    5. Abdin, Z. & Webb, C.J. & Gray, E.MacA., 2015. "Solar hydrogen hybrid energy systems for off-grid electricity supply: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 1791-1808.
    6. Meerman, J.C. & Ramírez, A. & Turkenburg, W.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2012. "Performance of simulated flexible integrated gasification polygeneration facilities, Part B: Economic evaluation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(8), pages 6083-6102.
    7. Peterseim, Juergen H. & White, Stuart & Tadros, Amir & Hellwig, Udo, 2014. "Concentrating solar power hybrid plants – Enabling cost effective synergies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 178-185.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rahbari, Alireza & Shirazi, Alec & Venkataraman, Mahesh B. & Pye, John, 2021. "Solar fuels from supercritical water gasification of algae: Impacts of low-cost hydrogen on reformer configurations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Middelhoff, Ella & Madden, Ben & Ximenes, Fabiano & Carney, Catherine & Florin, Nick, 2022. "Assessing electricity generation potential and identifying possible locations for siting hybrid concentrated solar biomass (HCSB) plants in New South Wales (NSW), Australia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    2. Yang, F. & Meerman, J.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2021. "Carbon capture and biomass in industry: A techno-economic analysis and comparison of negative emission options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Wolfersdorf, Christian & Boblenz, Kristin & Pardemann, Robert & Meyer, Bernd, 2015. "Syngas-based annex concepts for chemical energy storage and improving flexibility of pulverized coal combustion power plants," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 618-627.
    4. Subramanian, Avinash S.R. & Gundersen, Truls & Barton, Paul I. & Adams, Thomas A., 2022. "Global optimization of a hybrid waste tire and natural gas feedstock polygeneration system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    5. Powell, Kody M. & Rashid, Khalid & Ellingwood, Kevin & Tuttle, Jake & Iverson, Brian D., 2017. "Hybrid concentrated solar thermal power systems: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 215-237.
    6. Farhat, Karim & Reichelstein, Stefan, 2016. "Economic value of flexible hydrogen-based polygeneration energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 857-870.
    7. Jana, Kuntal & Ray, Avishek & Majoumerd, Mohammad Mansouri & Assadi, Mohsen & De, Sudipta, 2017. "Polygeneration as a future sustainable energy solution – A comprehensive review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 88-111.
    8. Wang, Jianxing & Duan, Liqiang & Yang, Yongping & Yang, Zhiping & Yang, Laishun, 2019. "Study on the general system integration optimization method of the solar aided coal-fired power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 660-673.
    9. Berghout, Niels & Meerman, Hans & van den Broek, Machteld & Faaij, André, 2019. "Assessing deployment pathways for greenhouse gas emissions reductions in an industrial plant – A case study for a complex oil refinery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 354-378.
    10. Burton, N.A. & Padilla, R.V. & Rose, A. & Habibullah, H., 2021. "Increasing the efficiency of hydrogen production from solar powered water electrolysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    11. Abdin, Z. & Webb, C.J. & Gray, E.MacA., 2016. "PEM fuel cell model and simulation in Matlab–Simulink based on physical parameters," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 1131-1144.
    12. Tafone, Alessio & Borri, Emiliano & Cabeza, Luisa F. & Romagnoli, Alessandro, 2021. "Innovative cryogenic Phase Change Material (PCM) based cold thermal energy storage for Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES) – Numerical dynamic modelling and experimental study of a packed bed unit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    13. Hoz, Jordi de la & Martín, Helena & Montalà, Montserrat & Matas, José & Guzman, Ramon, 2018. "Assessing the 2014 retroactive regulatory framework applied to the concentrating solar power systems in Spain," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1377-1399.
    14. Batidzirai, B. & Mignot, A.P.R. & Schakel, W.B. & Junginger, H.M. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2013. "Biomass torrefaction technology: Techno-economic status and future prospects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 196-214.
    15. Alva, Guruprasad & Lin, Yaxue & Fang, Guiyin, 2018. "An overview of thermal energy storage systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 341-378.
    16. Hussain, C.M. Iftekhar & Norton, Brian & Duffy, Aidan, 2017. "Technological assessment of different solar-biomass systems for hybrid power generation in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 1115-1129.
    17. Popov, Dimityr & Borissova, Ana, 2017. "Innovative configuration of a hybrid nuclear-solar tower power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 736-746.
    18. Mostafavi Tehrani, S. Saeed & Shoraka, Yashar & Nithyanandam, Karthik & Taylor, Robert A., 2019. "Shell-and-tube or packed bed thermal energy storage systems integrated with a concentrated solar power: A techno-economic comparison of sensible and latent heat systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 887-910.
    19. Prasad, Abhnil A. & Taylor, Robert A. & Kay, Merlinde, 2017. "Assessment of solar and wind resource synergy in Australia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 354-367.
    20. Gutiérrez-Alvarez, R. & Guerra, K. & Haro, P., 2023. "Market profitability of CSP-biomass hybrid power plants: Towards a firm supply of renewable energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:173:y:2016:i:c:p:578-588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.