IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v301y2017icp36-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does resolution of strategy affect network reciprocity in spatial prisoner's dilemma games?

Author

Listed:
  • Tanimoto, Jun

Abstract

In the canonical framework of evolutionary 2×2 games, a binary strategy set comprising cooperation (C) and defection (D) has usually been presumed. Inspired by commonly observed real-world facts, we explore what happens if the resolution of strategy increases. As an extreme limit, the infinite resolution case is both a continuous and a mixed strategy defined by a real number in the range of [0,1]. We find that increasing resolution amplifies cooperation in spatial prisoner's dilemma games as compared with the binary strategy definition; however, this enhancement tendency with increasing resolution is not monotonic in the case of a mixed-strategy setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanimoto, Jun, 2017. "How does resolution of strategy affect network reciprocity in spatial prisoner's dilemma games?," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 301(C), pages 36-42.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:301:y:2017:i:c:p:36-42
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2016.11.036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300316307123
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2016.11.036?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kokubo, Satoshi & Wang, Zhen & Tanimoto, Jun, 2015. "Spatial reciprocity for discrete, continuous and mixed strategy setups," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 259(C), pages 552-568.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haodong Niu & Keyu Li & Juan Wang, 2023. "Paid Access to Information Promotes the Emergence of Cooperation in the Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Liu, Chen & Guo, Hao & Li, Zhibin & Gao, Xiaoyuan & Li, Shudong, 2019. "Coevolution of multi-game resolves social dilemma in network population," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 341(C), pages 402-407.
    3. Han, Ying & Song, Zhao & Sun, Jialong & Ma, Jiezhong & Guo, Yangming & Zhu, Peican, 2020. "Investing the effect of age and cooperation in spatial multigame," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 541(C).
    4. Zhang, Xin-Jie & Tang, Yong & Xiong, Jason & Wang, Wei-Jia & Zhang, Yi-Cheng, 2020. "Ranking game on networks: The evolution of hierarchical society," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 540(C).
    5. Liu, Chengwei & Wang, Juan & Li, Xiaopeng & Xia, Chengyi, 2020. "The link weight adjustment considering historical strategy promotes the cooperation in the spatial prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 554(C).
    6. Liu, Linjie & Chen, Xiaojie, 2022. "Effects of interconnections among corruption, institutional punishment, and economic factors on the evolution of cooperation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 425(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lv, Shaojie & Wang, Xianjia, 2020. "The impact of heterogeneous investments on the evolution of cooperation in public goods game with exclusion," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    2. Wang, Yadong & Wang, Delu & Shi, Xunpeng, 2021. "Exploring the dilemma of overcapacity governance in China's coal industry: A tripartite evolutionary game model," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Askar, S.S. & Alnowibet, K., 2016. "Cooperation versus noncooperation: Cournot duopolistic game based on delay and time-dependent parameters," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 580-584.
    4. Ahsan Habib, Md. & Tanaka, Masaki & Tanimoto, Jun, 2020. "How does conformity promote the enhancement of cooperation in the network reciprocity in spatial prisoner's dilemma games?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Yu, Xiaohui & He, Mingke & Sun, Hongxia & Zhou, Zhen, 2020. "Uncertain coalition structure game with payoff of belief structure," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 372(C).
    6. Tanimoto, Jun, 2017. "Coevolution of discrete, mixed, and continuous strategy systems boosts in the spatial prisoner's dilemma and chicken games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 304(C), pages 20-27.
    7. Su, Qi & Li, Aming & Wang, Long, 2017. "Spatial structure favors cooperative behavior in the snowdrift game with multiple interactive dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 468(C), pages 299-306.
    8. Mo, Fei & Han, Wenchen, 2024. "Long homogeneous payoff records with the latest strategy promotes the cooperation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 476(C).
    9. Askar, S.S., 2021. "On complex dynamics of Cournot-Bertrand game with asymmetric market information," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 393(C).
    10. Alam, Muntasir & Nagashima, Keisuke & Tanimoto, Jun, 2018. "Various error settings bring different noise-driven effects on network reciprocity in spatial prisoner's dilemma," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 338-346.
    11. Welburn, Jonathan W. & Hausken, Kjell, 2015. "A game theoretic model of economic crises," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 266(C), pages 738-762.
    12. Szabó, György & Hódsági, Kristóf, 2016. "The role of mixed strategies in spatial evolutionary games," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 462(C), pages 198-206.
    13. Zheng, Liping & Xu, Hedong & Tian, Cunzhi & Fan, Suohai, 2021. "Evolutionary dynamics of information in the market: Transmission and trust," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    14. Askar, S.S., 2022. "On the dynamics of Cournot duopoly game with private firms: Investigations and analysis," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 432(C).
    15. Hu, Xiang & Liu, Xingwen & Zhou, Xiaobing, 2022. "A proportional-neighborhood-diversity evolution in snowdrift game on square lattice," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 607(C).
    16. Askar, S.S. & Alshamrani, Ahmad M. & Alnowibet, K., 2016. "The arising of cooperation in Cournot duopoly games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 273(C), pages 535-542.
    17. Wang, Xianjia & Lv, Shaojie, 2019. "The roles of particle swarm intelligence in the prisoner’s dilemma based on continuous and mixed strategy systems on scale-free networks," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 355(C), pages 213-220.
    18. Shu, Feng & Liu, Xingwen & Fang, Kai & Chen, Hao, 2018. "Memory-based snowdrift game on a square lattice," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 496(C), pages 15-26.
    19. Ye, Wenxing & Fan, Suohai, 2020. "Evolutionary traveler’s dilemma game based on particle swarm optimization," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 544(C).
    20. Shu, Gang & Du, Xia & Li, Ya, 2016. "Surrounding information consideration promotes cooperation in Prisoner’s dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 689-694.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:301:y:2017:i:c:p:36-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.