IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v279y2016icp76-89.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of perception cost in tag-mediated cooperation

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Hong
  • Ye, Hang

Abstract

Tag-mediated interaction has been known to be an effective means of promoting cooperation in theoretical models. However, most of the previous studies assume that the individuals do not incur any costs for their tag perception, although it is doubtful whether the cognitive effort for tag perception is empirically high. In this paper, we establish a spatial Prisoners dilemma model with tags to investigate the role of perception cost in tag-mediated cooperation. By introducing incomplete perception with perception cost, we find that partial perception can emerge and support cooperation under relatively low perception cost, but perception cost may inhibit the emergence of partial perception and thus is detrimental the evolution of cooperation. Moreover, the dynamics of cooperation level and perception intensity show interesting oscillatory patterns interacting with each other, which resemble those in other tag-based models. From the typical snapshots, we find that the high levels of cooperation can be explained by the clear boundaries between tag-mediated cooperative clusters. These boundaries can resist interactions between clusters and therefore prevent defectors from invading the whole population. Our work should be helpful in understanding the cognitive foundation of tag-mediated cooperation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Hong & Ye, Hang, 2016. "Role of perception cost in tag-mediated cooperation," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 279(C), pages 76-89.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:279:y:2016:i:c:p:76-89
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2016.01.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300316300091
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2016.01.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laurent Keller & Kenneth G. Ross, 1998. "Selfish genes: a green beard in the red fire ant," Nature, Nature, vol. 394(6693), pages 573-575, August.
    2. Vincent A. A. Jansen & Minus van Baalen, 2006. "Altruism through beard chromodynamics," Nature, Nature, vol. 440(7084), pages 663-666, March.
    3. Zhang, Hong, 2015. "Moderate tolerance promotes tag-mediated cooperation in spatial Prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 424(C), pages 52-61.
    4. Karl Sigmund & Martin A. Nowak, 2001. "Tides of tolerance," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6862), pages 403-405, November.
    5. Max Hartshorn & Artem Kaznatcheev & Thomas Shultz, 2013. "The Evolutionary Dominance of Ethnocentric Cooperation," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 16(3), pages 1-7.
    6. Rick L. Riolo & Michael D. Cohen & Robert Axelrod, 2001. "Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity," Nature, Nature, vol. 414(6862), pages 441-443, November.
    7. Martin A. Nowak & Karl Sigmund, 1998. "Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring," Nature, Nature, vol. 393(6685), pages 573-577, June.
    8. M.A. Nowak & K. Sigmund, 1998. "Evolution of Indirect Reciprocity by Image Scoring/ The Dynamics of Indirect Reciprocity," Working Papers ir98040, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
    9. Gilbert Roberts & Thomas N. Sherratt, 2002. "Does similarity breed cooperation?," Nature, Nature, vol. 418(6897), pages 499-500, August.
    10. Jae-Woo Kim, 2010. "A Tag-Based Evolutionary Prisoner's Dilemma Game on Networks with Different Topologies," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 13(3), pages 1-2.
    11. Rick L. Riolo, 1997. "The Effects of Tag-Mediated Selection of Partners in Evolving Populations Playing the Iterated PrisonerÕs Dilemma," Working Papers 97-02-016, Santa Fe Institute.
    12. Tanimoto, Jun, 2015. "The impact of initial cooperation fraction on the evolutionary fate in a spatial prisoner's dilemma game," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 263(C), pages 171-188.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jian, Qing & Li, Xiaopeng & Wang, Juan & Xia, Chengyi, 2021. "Impact of reputation assortment on tag-mediated altruistic behaviors in the spatial lattice," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 396(C).
    2. Hadzibeganovic, Tarik & Liu, Chao & Li, Rong, 2021. "Effects of reproductive skew on the evolution of ethnocentrism in structured populations with variable size," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 568(C).
    3. Fukutomi, Masao & Kurokawa, Shun, 2018. "How much cost should reciprocators pay in order to distinguish the opponent's cooperation from the opponent's defection?," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 336(C), pages 301-314.
    4. Quan, Ji & Pu, Zhenjuan & Wang, Xianjia, 2021. "Comparison of social exclusion and punishment in promoting cooperation: Who should play the leading role?," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Hong, 2015. "Moderate tolerance promotes tag-mediated cooperation in spatial Prisoner’s dilemma game," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 424(C), pages 52-61.
    2. Yutaka Nakai, 2014. "In-group favoritism due to friend selection strategies based on fixed tag and within-group reputation," Rationality and Society, , vol. 26(3), pages 320-354, August.
    3. David Hales & Bruce Edmonds, 2019. "Intragenerational Cultural Evolution and Ethnocentrism," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 63(5), pages 1283-1309, May.
    4. Zhang, Hong, 2023. "Evolution of cooperation with tag-based expulsion in spatial public goods game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    5. Henrich, Joseph, 2004. "Reply," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 127-143, January.
    6. Faqi Du & Feng Fu, 2011. "Partner Selection Shapes the Strategic and Topological Evolution of Cooperation," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 1(3), pages 354-369, September.
    7. Janssen, Marco A., 2008. "Evolution of cooperation in a one-shot Prisoner's Dilemma based on recognition of trustworthy and untrustworthy agents," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 65(3-4), pages 458-471, March.
    8. Bruce Edmonds, 2006. "The Emergence of Symbiotic Groups Resulting from Skill-Differentiation and Tags," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10.
    9. Xiaojie Chen & Alana Schick & Michael Doebeli & Alistair Blachford & Long Wang, 2012. "Reputation-Based Conditional Interaction Supports Cooperation in Well-Mixed Prisoner’s Dilemmas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-7, May.
    10. Te Wu & Long Wang & Feng Fu, 2017. "Coevolutionary dynamics of phenotypic diversity and contingent cooperation," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Wang, Xiaofeng & Chen, Xiaojie & Gao, Jia & Wang, Long, 2013. "Reputation-based mutual selection rule promotes cooperation in spatial threshold public goods games," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 181-187.
    12. Yu, Fengyuan & Wang, Jianwei & Chen, Wei & He, Jialu, 2023. "Increased cooperation potential and risk under suppressed strategy differentiation," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 621(C).
    13. Isamu Okada, 2020. "A Review of Theoretical Studies on Indirect Reciprocity," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Mayuko Nakamaru & Akira Yokoyama, 2014. "The Effect of Ostracism and Optional Participation on the Evolution of Cooperation in the Voluntary Public Goods Game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(9), pages 1-9, September.
    15. Peter Andras & John Lazarus & Gilbert Roberts & Steven J Lynden, 2005. "Uncertainty and Cooperation: Analytical Results and a Simulated Agent Society," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 9(1), pages 1-7.
    16. Tim Johnson & Oleg Smirnov, 2012. "An alternative mechanism through which economic inequality facilitates collective action: Wealth disparities as a sign of cooperativeness," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 24(4), pages 461-484, October.
    17. Durrett, Richard & Levin, Simon A., 2005. "Can stable social groups be maintained by homophilous imitation alone?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 57(3), pages 267-286, July.
    18. Elliot T Berkman & Evgeniya Lukinova & Ivan Menshikov & Mikhail Myagkov, 2015. "Sociality as a Natural Mechanism of Public Goods Provision," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    19. Jason Barr & Troy Tassier, 2010. "Endogenous Neighborhood Selection and the Attainment of Cooperation in a Spatial Prisoner’s Dilemma Game," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 35(3), pages 211-234, March.
    20. Fabio Della Rossa & Fabio Dercole & Anna Di Meglio, 2020. "Direct Reciprocity and Model-Predictive Strategy Update Explain the Network Reciprocity Observed in Socioeconomic Networks," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-28, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:279:y:2016:i:c:p:76-89. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.