IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/apmaco/v271y2015icp642-656.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On an exact penalty function method for nonlinear mixed discrete programming problems and its applications in search engine advertising problems

Author

Listed:
  • Ma, Cheng
  • Zhang, Liansheng

Abstract

In this paper, we study a new exact and smooth penalty function for the nonlinear mixed discrete programming problem by augumenting only one variable no matter how many constraints. Through the smooth and exact penalty function, we can transform the nonlinear mixed discrete programming problem into an unconstrained optimization model. We demonstrate that under mild conditions, when the penalty parameter is sufficiently large, optimizers of this penalty function are precisely the optimizers of the nonlinear mixed discrete programming problem. Alternatively, under some mild assumptions, the local exactness property is also presented. The numerical results demonstrate that the new penalty function is an effective and promising approach. As important applications, we solve an increasingly popular search engine advertising problem via the new proposed penalty function.

Suggested Citation

  • Ma, Cheng & Zhang, Liansheng, 2015. "On an exact penalty function method for nonlinear mixed discrete programming problems and its applications in search engine advertising problems," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 271(C), pages 642-656.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:271:y:2015:i:c:p:642-656
    DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2015.09.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0096300315012382
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.amc.2015.09.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Raghavachari, 1969. "On Connections Between Zero-One Integer Programming and Concave Programming Under Linear Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 680-684, August.
    2. Marianna De Santis & Stefano Lucidi & Francesco Rinaldi, 2013. "A new class of functions for measuring solution integrality in the Feasibility Pump approach: Complete Results," DIAG Technical Reports 2013-05, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    3. Changyu Wang & Qian Liu & Cheng Ma, 2013. "Smoothing SQP algorithm for semismooth equations with box constraints," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 399-425, June.
    4. Benjamin Edelman & Michael Ostrovsky & Michael Schwarz, 2007. "Internet Advertising and the Generalized Second-Price Auction: Selling Billions of Dollars Worth of Keywords," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 97(1), pages 242-259, March.
    5. Walter Murray & Kien-Ming Ng, 2010. "An algorithm for nonlinear optimization problems with binary variables," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 257-288, October.
    6. Panos M Pardalos & Oleg A Prokopyev & Stanislav Busygin, 2006. "Continuous Approaches for Solving Discrete Optimization Problems," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Gautam Appa & Leonidas Pitsoulis & H. Paul Williams (ed.), Handbook on Modelling for Discrete Optimization, chapter 0, pages 39-60, Springer.
    7. Varian, Hal R., 2007. "Position auctions," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 1163-1178, December.
    8. Antczak, Tadeusz, 2009. "Exact penalty functions method for mathematical programming problems involving invex functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 29-36, October.
    9. S. Lucidi & F. Rinaldi, 2010. "Exact Penalty Functions for Nonlinear Integer Programming Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 145(3), pages 479-488, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M. V. Dolgopolik, 2018. "A Unified Approach to the Global Exactness of Penalty and Augmented Lagrangian Functions II: Extended Exactness," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 745-762, March.
    2. Y. Bai & E. Hashorva & G. Ratovomirija & M. Tamraz, 2016. "Some Mathematical Aspects of Price Optimisation," Papers 1605.05814, arXiv.org.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Santis & F. Rinaldi, 2012. "Continuous Reformulations for Zero–One Programming Problems," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 75-84, April.
    2. Marianna De Santis & Francesco Rinaldi, 2010. "Continuous reformulations for zero-one programming problems," DIS Technical Reports 2010-16, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    3. Stefano Lucidi & Francesco Rinaldi, 2010. "An Exact Penalty Global Optimization Approach for Mixed-Integer Programming Problems," DIS Technical Reports 2010-17, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    4. Avi Goldfarb, 2014. "What is Different About Online Advertising?," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 44(2), pages 115-129, March.
    5. Francesco Decarolis & Gabriele Rovigatti, 2021. "From Mad Men to Maths Men: Concentration and Buyer Power in Online Advertising," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 111(10), pages 3299-3327, October.
    6. Caragiannis, Ioannis & Kaklamanis, Christos & Kanellopoulos, Panagiotis & Kyropoulou, Maria & Lucier, Brendan & Paes Leme, Renato & Tardos, Éva, 2015. "Bounding the inefficiency of outcomes in generalized second price auctions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 343-388.
    7. Andersson , Ola & Andersson , Tommy, 2015. "Decomposing the Afternoon Effect: An Empirical Investigation of Sequential Train Ticket Auctions," Working Papers 2015:28, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    8. Haluk Ergin & Tayfun Sönmez & M. Utku Ünver, 2020. "Efficient and Incentive‐Compatible Liver Exchange," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 965-1005, May.
    9. Aditya Bhave & Eric Budish, 2017. "Primary-Market Auctions for Event Tickets: Eliminating the Rents of 'Bob the Broker'?," NBER Working Papers 23770, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    10. Thomas Blake & Chris Nosko & Steven Tadelis, 2015. "Consumer Heterogeneity and Paid Search Effectiveness: A Large‐Scale Field Experiment," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83, pages 155-174, January.
    11. Kaifu Zhang & Zsolt Katona, 2012. "Contextual Advertising," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 980-994, November.
    12. Tilman B?rgers & Ingemar Cox & Martin Pesendorfer & Vaclav Petricek, 2013. "Equilibrium Bids in Sponsored Search Auctions: Theory and Evidence," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 5(4), pages 163-187, November.
    13. Rupaj Kumar Nayak & Nirmalya Kumar Mohanty, 2020. "Solution of boolean quadratic programming problems by two augmented Lagrangian algorithms based on a continuous relaxation," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 39(3), pages 792-825, April.
    14. Mark Armstrong & Jidong Zhou, 2011. "Paying for Prominence," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(556), pages 368-395, November.
    15. Nicolás Figueroa & Vasiliki Skreta, 2011. "Optimal allocation mechanisms with single-dimensional private information," Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 15(3), pages 213-243, September.
    16. Marianna De Santis & Stefano Lucidi & Francesco Rinaldi, 2013. "A new class of functions for measuring solution integrality in the Feasibility Pump approach: Complete Results," DIAG Technical Reports 2013-05, Department of Computer, Control and Management Engineering, Universita' degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza".
    17. Burguet, Roberto & Caminal, Ramon & Ellman, Matthew, 2015. "In Google we trust?," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 44-55.
    18. Ken Heyer & Carl Shapiro & Jeffrey Wilder, 2009. "The Year in Review: Economics at the Antitrust Division, 2008–2009," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 35(4), pages 349-367, December.
    19. Agam Gupta & Biswatosh Saha & Uttam K. Sarkar, 2017. "Emergent Heterogeneity in Keyword Valuation in Sponsored Search Markets: A Closer-to-Practice Perspective," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 50(4), pages 687-710, December.
    20. Committee, Nobel Prize, 2012. "Alvin E. Roth and Lloyd S. Shapley: Stable allocations and the practice of market design," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2012-1, Nobel Prize Committee.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:apmaco:v:271:y:2015:i:c:p:642-656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/applied-mathematics-and-computation .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.