IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v295y2024ics0378377424000672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of daily crop reference evapotranspiration and sensitivity analysis of FAO Penman-Monteith equation using ERA5-Land reanalysis database in Sicily, Italy

Author

Listed:
  • Ippolito, Matteo
  • De Caro, Dario
  • Cannarozzo, Marcella
  • Provenzano, Giuseppe
  • Ciraolo, Giuseppe

Abstract

Crop evapotranspiration (ET) is one of the most important components in many hydrological processes. The crop reference evapotranspiration (ETo) represents the atmospheric water demand in each crop type, development stage, and management practices. The Penman-Monteith equation in the version suggested by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO56-PM), is one of the most used methods to estimate ETo. In several regions of the world, meteorological observations are not always available. The most recent reanalysis database ERA5-Land, released in 2019, can be useful to overcome this limit. The database provides, with a spatial grid of 0.1° latitude and 0.1° longitude, several hourly climate data such as air temperature, dew point temperature, solar radiation, and wind speed components all at 2.0 m above the soil surface, except wind speed components at 10 m, useful to apply the FAO56-PM equation. The objective of this research is to assess the quality of ERA5-Land climate variables data to estimate daily ETo in Sicily, Italy. The effect of the weather station’s elevation associated with the statistical indicators was also evaluated to verify how the morphology affects the measurements. Finally, the sensitivity analysis of the FAO56-PM equation was carried out to identify which climate variables have the most influence on the ETo estimation. For the period 2006–2015, the comparison between air temperature, global solar radiation, wind speed, and relative air humidity, measured from 39 ground weather stations in Sicily, and ERA5-Land was carried out and then, through FAO56-PM equation daily ETo values were estimated using both databases. The statistical indicators Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Bias Error (MBE) confirm the possibility of considering the ERA5-Land a suitable solution to estimate ETo. The sensitivity analysis showed that good ETo estimation depends mainly on the accuracy of the relative air humidity and air temperature data.

Suggested Citation

  • Ippolito, Matteo & De Caro, Dario & Cannarozzo, Marcella & Provenzano, Giuseppe & Ciraolo, Giuseppe, 2024. "Evaluation of daily crop reference evapotranspiration and sensitivity analysis of FAO Penman-Monteith equation using ERA5-Land reanalysis database in Sicily, Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:295:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424000672
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424000672
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108732?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paredes, Paula & Trigo, Isabel & de Bruin, Henk & Simões, Nuno & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Daily grass reference evapotranspiration with Meteosat Second Generation shortwave radiation and reference ET products," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    2. Paredes, Paula & Martins, Diogo S. & Pereira, Luis Santos & Cadima, Jorge & Pires, Carlos, 2018. "Accuracy of daily estimation of grass reference evapotranspiration using ERA-Interim reanalysis products with assessment of alternative bias correction schemes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 340-353.
    3. Prashant Srivastava & Tanvir Islam & Manika Gupta & George Petropoulos & Qiang Dai, 2015. "WRF Dynamical Downscaling and Bias Correction Schemes for NCEP Estimated Hydro-Meteorological Variables," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(7), pages 2267-2284, May.
    4. Minacapilli, M. & Cammalleri, C. & Ciraolo, G. & Rallo, G. & Provenzano, G., 2016. "Using scintillometry to assess reference evapotranspiration methods and their impact on the water balance of olive groves," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 49-60.
    5. Pelosi, A. & Chirico, G.B., 2021. "Regional assessment of daily reference evapotranspiration: Can ground observations be replaced by blending ERA5-Land meteorological reanalysis and CM-SAF satellite-based radiation data?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    6. Sentelhas, Paulo C. & Gillespie, Terry J. & Santos, Eduardo A., 2010. "Evaluation of FAO Penman-Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(5), pages 635-644, May.
    7. Pelosi, A., 2023. "Performance of the Copernicus European Regional Reanalysis (CERRA) dataset as proxy of ground-based agrometeorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    8. Jennifer F. Newman & Petra M. Klein, 2014. "The Impacts of Atmospheric Stability on the Accuracy of Wind Speed Extrapolation Methods," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, January.
    9. Nikolaos Gourgouletis & Marianna Gkavrou & Evangelos Baltas, 2023. "Comparison of Empirical ETo Relationships with ERA5-Land and In Situ Data in Greece," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-23, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Longo-Minnolo, Giuseppe & D’Emilio, Alessandro & Vanella, Daniela & Consoli, Simona, 2024. "Advancing in satellite-based models coupled with reanalysis agrometeorological data for improving the irrigation management under the European Water Framework Directive," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pelosi, A., 2023. "Performance of the Copernicus European Regional Reanalysis (CERRA) dataset as proxy of ground-based agrometeorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).
    2. Paredes, P. & Pereira, L.S. & Almorox, J. & Darouich, H., 2020. "Reference grass evapotranspiration with reduced data sets: Parameterization of the FAO Penman-Monteith temperature approach and the Hargeaves-Samani equation using local climatic variables," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    3. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi, 2022. "Reference crop evapotranspiration for data-sparse regions using reanalysis products," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    4. Paredes, Paula & Trigo, Isabel & de Bruin, Henk & Simões, Nuno & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Daily grass reference evapotranspiration with Meteosat Second Generation shortwave radiation and reference ET products," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    5. Pelosi, A. & Chirico, G.B., 2021. "Regional assessment of daily reference evapotranspiration: Can ground observations be replaced by blending ERA5-Land meteorological reanalysis and CM-SAF satellite-based radiation data?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    6. De Caro, Dario & Ippolito, Matteo & Cannarozzo, Marcella & Provenzano, Giuseppe & Ciraolo, Giuseppe, 2023. "Assessing the performance of the Gaussian Process Regression algorithm to fill gaps in the time-series of daily actual evapotranspiration of different crops in temperate and continental zones using gr," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    7. Paredes, Paula & Martins, Diogo S. & Pereira, Luis Santos & Cadima, Jorge & Pires, Carlos, 2018. "Accuracy of daily estimation of grass reference evapotranspiration using ERA-Interim reanalysis products with assessment of alternative bias correction schemes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 340-353.
    8. Vásquez, Cristina & Célleri, Rolando & Córdova, Mario & Carrillo-Rojas, Galo, 2022. "Improving reference evapotranspiration (ETo) calculation under limited data conditions in the high Tropical Andes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    9. Choudhury, B.U. & Singh, Anil Kumar & Pradhan, S., 2013. "Estimation of crop coefficients of dry-seeded irrigated rice–wheat rotation on raised beds by field water balance method in the Indo-Gangetic plains, India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 20-31.
    10. Awada, Hassan & Di Prima, Simone & Sirca, Costantino & Giadrossich, Filippo & Marras, Serena & Spano, Donatella & Pirastru, Mario, 2022. "A remote sensing and modeling integrated approach for constructing continuous time series of daily actual evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    11. Negm, Amro & Minacapilli, Mario & Provenzano, Giuseppe, 2018. "Downscaling of American National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) daily air temperature in Sicily, Italy, and effects on crop reference evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 151-162.
    12. Allen, Richard G. & Dhungel, Ramesh & Dhungana, Bibha & Huntington, Justin & Kilic, Ayse & Morton, Charles, 2021. "Conditioning point and gridded weather data under aridity conditions for calculation of reference evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    13. Pérez Albornoz, C. & Escalante Soberanis, M.A. & Ramírez Rivera, V. & Rivero, M., 2022. "Review of atmospheric stability estimations for wind power applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    14. Aouissi, Jalel & Benabdallah, Sihem & Lili Chabaâne, Zohra & Cudennec, Christophe, 2016. "Evaluation of potential evapotranspiration assessment methods for hydrological modelling with SWAT—Application in data-scarce rural Tunisia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 39-51.
    15. Ferreira, Lucas Borges & da Cunha, Fernando França & Fernandes Filho, Elpídio Inácio, 2022. "Exploring machine learning and multi-task learning to estimate meteorological data and reference evapotranspiration across Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    16. Babak Farjad & Anil Gupta & Danielle J. Marceau, 2016. "Annual and Seasonal Variations of Hydrological Processes Under Climate Change Scenarios in Two Sub-Catchments of a Complex Watershed," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(8), pages 2851-2865, June.
    17. Xiang, Keyu & Li, Yi & Horton, Robert & Feng, Hao, 2020. "Similarity and difference of potential evapotranspiration and reference crop evapotranspiration – a review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    18. Sharma, Harmandeep & Shukla, Manoj K. & Bosland, Paul W. & Steiner, Robert, 2017. "Soil moisture sensor calibration, actual evapotranspiration, and crop coefficients for drip irrigated greenhouse chile peppers," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 81-91.
    19. Prashant K. Srivastava & Dawei Han & Aradhana Yaduvanshi & George P. Petropoulos & Sudhir Kumar Singh & Rajesh Kumar Mall & Rajendra Prasad, 2017. "Reference Evapotranspiration Retrievals from a Mesoscale Model Based Weather Variables for Soil Moisture Deficit Estimation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.
    20. Berti, Antonio & Tardivo, Gianmarco & Chiaudani, Alessandro & Rech, Francesco & Borin, Maurizio, 2014. "Assessing reference evapotranspiration by the Hargreaves method in north-eastern Italy," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 20-25.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:295:y:2024:i:c:s0378377424000672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.