IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v278y2023ics0378377423000410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could buckwheat and spelt be alternatives to wheat under future environmental conditions? Study of their physiological response to drought

Author

Listed:
  • Martínez-Goñi, Xabier Simón
  • Miranda-Apodaca, Jon
  • Pérez-López, Usue

Abstract

Drought is one of the most harmful abiotic stresses for plants. Future drought episodes are expected to increase, negatively affecting globally cultivated crops as wheat (Triticum aestivum). Together with the crop dependency, future global food security is at risk. Thus, finding alternative crops for wheat capable of resisting drought episodes is essential to ensure food supply. Spelt (Triticum spelta) and buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) are two underutilized alternative crops, whose drought resistance mechanisms remain unknown. We hypothesize that both species will have drought avoidance characteristics and will have a better drought response than wheat. We grew wheat, spelt and buckwheat in a greenhouse. Drought treatment started 28 days after sowing. When wheat and spelt reached 40 % field capacity (FC), drought was kept for 1-week, while in buckwheat the drought was kept for 4-weeks at 20 % FC. Even if partially inhibited by drought, buckwheat showed an extremely higher total biomass, as well as an extremely higher water use efficiency (WUE) than wheat and spelt. Photosynthetic parameters were extremely reduced in spelt, whereas those were less affected in wheat. The reduction in osmotic potential and the use of osmotic adjustment of spelt in combination with the increases in the antioxidant metabolism indicate the prevalence of drought tolerance mechanisms. The lack of effect on antioxidant metabolism in wheat, along with the reductions in stomatal conductance and water potential indicate the use of drought avoidance mechanisms. Buckwheat showed drought avoidance mechanisms, and its physiological parameters were almost not affected by extreme drought. Overall, spelt showed strong damages under mild drought, whereas buckwheat managed to cope with extreme drought by reducing its water requirements and increasing WUE in order to ensure its photosynthetic activity. Thus, buckwheat appears to be a potential alternative to wheat for extreme drought conditions, while spelt is not.

Suggested Citation

  • Martínez-Goñi, Xabier Simón & Miranda-Apodaca, Jon & Pérez-López, Usue, 2023. "Could buckwheat and spelt be alternatives to wheat under future environmental conditions? Study of their physiological response to drought," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:278:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423000410
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377423000410
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulfat, Aneela & Shokat, Sajid & Li, Xiangnan & Fang, Liang & Großkinsky, Dominik K. & Majid, Syed Abdul & Roitsch, Thomas & Liu, Fulai, 2021. "Elevated carbon dioxide alleviates the negative impact of drought on wheat by modulating plant metabolism and physiology," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    2. Allah Wasaya & Sobia Manzoor & Tauqeer Ahmad Yasir & Naeem Sarwar & Khuram Mubeen & Ismail A. Ismail & Ali Raza & Abdul Rehman & Akbar Hossain & Ayman EL Sabagh, 2021. "Evaluation of Fourteen Bread Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes by Observing Gas Exchange Parameters, Relative Water and Chlorophyll Content, and Yield Attributes under Drought Stress," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Miranda-Apodaca, Jon & Yoldi-Achalandabaso, Ander & Aguirresarobe, Aitor & del Canto, Arantza & Pérez-López, Usue, 2018. "Similarities and differences between the responses to osmotic and ionic stress in quinoa from a water use perspective," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 344-352.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sun, Xutong & Lv, Aimin & Chen, Dandan & Zhang, Zili & Wang, Xuming & Zhou, Aicun & Xu, Xiaowei & Shao, Qingsong & Zheng, Ying, 2023. "Exogenous spermidine enhanced the water deficit tolerance of Anoectochilus roxburghii by modulating plant antioxidant enzymes and polyamine metabolism," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zsuzsanna Farkas & Angéla Anda & Gyula Vida & Ottó Veisz & Balázs Varga, 2021. "CO 2 Responses of Winter Wheat, Barley and Oat Cultivars under Optimum and Limited Irrigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Safina Naz & Ahmer Bilal & Bushra Saddiq & Shaghef Ejaz & Sajid Ali & Sakeena Tul Ain Haider & Hasan Sardar & Bushra Nasir & Ishtiaq Ahmad & Rahul Kumar Tiwari & Milan Kumar Lal & Awais Shakoor & Moha, 2022. "Foliar Application of Salicylic Acid Improved Growth, Yield, Quality and Photosynthesis of Pea ( Pisum sativum L.) by Improving Antioxidant Defense Mechanism under Saline Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    3. Lucia Ottaiano & Ida Di Mola & Chiara Cirillo & Eugenio Cozzolino & Mauro Mori, 2021. "Yield Performance and Physiological Response of a Maize Early Hybrid Grown in Tunnel and Open Air under Different Water Regimes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    4. František Hnilička & Helena Hniličková & Tomáš Rýgl, 2024. "Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of four sorghum genotypes under drought stress and rehydratation," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(9), pages 543-551.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:278:y:2023:i:c:s0378377423000410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.