IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v261y2022ics0378377421006107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimized spectral index models for accurately retrieving soil moisture (SM) of winter wheat under water stress

Author

Listed:
  • Ren, Shoujia
  • Guo, Bin
  • Wang, Zhijun
  • Wang, Juan
  • Fang, Quanxiao
  • Wang, Jianlin

Abstract

Soil moisture (SM) is an important indicator of the photosynthetic rate and growth status of crops. A few related parameters, such as the red-edge parameters and spectral indices, have been adopted for retrieving the SM of winter wheat. To further study their abilities to detect the SM, field-scale water stress experiments on winter wheat were conducted during the 2018/19 growing season. The spectral ratio index in the near-infrared (NIR) shoulder region (NSRI) (700–1100 nm) was selected by comparing the correlations between the SM and the red edge parameters and spectral indices, and it was optimized using the partial least squares regression (PLSR) method. To assess the performance of the sensitive wavebands of the NSRI in retrieving the SM, three types of spectral index models were established using multiple linear regression (MLR) for the winter wheat from the jointing to the ripening stage. The results indicate that the red-edge parameters are more sensitive to the spectral variation during the jointing and flowering stages. The sensitivity decreased with increasing water stress. The red-edge area (SDr) of winter wheat irrigated in the flowering stage (D1 treatment) and irrigated in the jointing stage (D2 treatment) decreased by 20–30%, respectively. In general, all of the parameters and indices were correlated with the surface SM (0–40 cm depth), especially for the NSRI, with a significant coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.52 in the 10–20 cm depth interval (P < 0.01). Moreover, all of the spectral index models based on the optimized NSRI have good capabilities for retrieving the SM in the jointing stage. The model for one derivative of the logarithm of the NSRI (logarithmic NSRI)' performed best, with R2 and root mean square error (RMSE) values of 0.81–0.92 and 0.17–0.89%, respectively. Finally, the (logarithmic NSRI)' model was used to retrieve the SM in the flowering–ripening stage (R2 =0.85). Overall, the optimized spectral index models can accurately and quickly retrieve the SM and can assist in predicting the effect of drought on the crop yield in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Ren, Shoujia & Guo, Bin & Wang, Zhijun & Wang, Juan & Fang, Quanxiao & Wang, Jianlin, 2022. "Optimized spectral index models for accurately retrieving soil moisture (SM) of winter wheat under water stress," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:261:y:2022:i:c:s0378377421006107
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421006107
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107333?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng, Zhigong & Lin, Shaozhe & Zhang, Baozhong & Wei, Zheng & Liu, Lu & Han, Nana & Cai, Jiabing & Chen, He, 2020. "Winter Wheat Canopy Water Content Monitoring Based on Spectral Transforms and “Three-edge” Parameters," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    2. Hyonho Chun & Sündüz Keleş, 2010. "Sparse partial least squares regression for simultaneous dimension reduction and variable selection," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 72(1), pages 3-25, January.
    3. Bai, Shanshan & Kang, Yaohu & Wan, Shuqin, 2020. "Drip fertigation regimes for winter wheat in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    4. Xindong Wei & Ning Wang & Pingping Luo & Jie Yang & Jian Zhang & Kangli Lin, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Assessment of Land Marketization and Its Driving Forces for Sustainable Urban–Rural Development in Shaanxi Province in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-20, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Deng, Juntao & Pan, Shijia & Zhou, Mingu & Gao, Wen & Yan, Yuncai & Niu, Zijie & Han, Wenting, 2023. "Optimum sampling window size and vegetation index selection for low-altitude multispectral estimation of root soil moisture content for Xuxiang Kiwifruit," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    2. Du, Ruiqi & Xiang, Youzhen & Zhang, Fucang & Chen, Junying & Shi, Hongzhao & Liu, Hao & Yang, Xiaofei & Yang, Ning & Yang, Xizhen & Wang, Tianyang & Wu, Yuxiao, 2024. "Combing transfer learning with the OPtical TRApezoid Model (OPTRAM) to diagnosis small-scale field soil moisture from hyperspectral data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julieta Fuentes & Pilar Poncela & Julio Rodríguez, 2015. "Sparse Partial Least Squares in Time Series for Macroeconomic Forecasting," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 576-595, June.
    2. Juan Xu & Mengsheng Yang & Ziliang Lu & Dan Liu & Yan Wu, 2021. "Quality Analysis on Spatial Planning Pattern of Rural Area in Southern Shaanxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Tommaso Proietti, 2016. "On the Selection of Common Factors for Macroeconomic Forecasting," Advances in Econometrics, in: Dynamic Factor Models, volume 35, pages 593-628, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    4. Kawano, Shuichi & Fujisawa, Hironori & Takada, Toyoyuki & Shiroishi, Toshihiko, 2015. "Sparse principal component regression with adaptive loading," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 192-203.
    5. Debamita Kundu & Riten Mitra & Jeremy T. Gaskins, 2021. "Bayesian variable selection for multioutcome models through shared shrinkage," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 48(1), pages 295-320, March.
    6. Zhang Yuping & Tibshirani Robert J. & Davis Ronald W., 2010. "Predicting Patient Survival from Longitudinal Gene Expression," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 9(1), pages 1-23, November.
    7. Li, Haoru & Li, Xiaoli & Mei, Xurong & Nangia, Vinay & Guo, Rui & Hao, Weiping & Wang, Jiandong, 2023. "An alternative water-fertilizer-saving management practice for wheat-maize cropping system in the North China Plain: Based on a 4-year field study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    8. Qiang Sun & Hongtu Zhu & Yufeng Liu & Joseph G. Ibrahim, 2015. "SPReM: Sparse Projection Regression Model For High-Dimensional Linear Regression," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 110(509), pages 289-302, March.
    9. Lee Woojoo & Lee Donghwan & Lee Youngjo & Pawitan Yudi, 2011. "Sparse Canonical Covariance Analysis for High-throughput Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-24, July.
    10. Minji Lee & Zhihua Su, 2020. "A Review of Envelope Models," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 88(3), pages 658-676, December.
    11. Yu, Dengdeng & Zhang, Li & Mizera, Ivan & Jiang, Bei & Kong, Linglong, 2019. "Sparse wavelet estimation in quantile regression with multiple functional predictors," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 12-29.
    12. Yagli, Gokhan Mert & Yang, Dazhi & Srinivasan, Dipti, 2019. "Automatic hourly solar forecasting using machine learning models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 487-498.
    13. Cubadda, Gianluca & Guardabascio, Barbara, 2012. "A medium-N approach to macroeconomic forecasting," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 1099-1105.
    14. Dmitry Kobak & Yves Bernaerts & Marissa A. Weis & Federico Scala & Andreas S. Tolias & Philipp Berens, 2021. "Sparse reduced‐rank regression for exploratory visualisation of paired multivariate data," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 980-1000, August.
    15. Firouzabadi, Ali Ghadami & Baghani, Javad & Jovzi, Mehdi & Albaji, Mohammad, 2021. "Effects of wheat row spacing layout and drip tape spacing on yield and water productivity in sandy clay loam soil in a semi-arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    16. Kun Liu & Zhen Zhang & Yu Shi & Xizhi Wang & Zhenwen Yu, 2024. "Optimizing Ridge–Furrow Ratio to Improve Water Resource Utilization for Wheat in the North China Plain," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, September.
    17. Jasmit Shah & Somnath Datta & Susmita Datta, 2014. "A multi-loss super regression learner (MSRL) with application to survival prediction using proteomics," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1749-1767, December.
    18. Iason Kynigakis & Ekaterini Panopoulou, 2022. "Does model complexity add value to asset allocation? Evidence from machine learning forecasting models," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(3), pages 603-639, April.
    19. Maria Nareklishvili & Nicholas Polson & Vadim Sokolov, 2022. "Feature Selection for Personalized Policy Analysis," Papers 2301.00251, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.
    20. Luis A. Barboza & Julien Emile-Geay & Bo Li & Wan He, 2019. "Efficient Reconstructions of Common Era Climate via Integrated Nested Laplace Approximations," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 24(3), pages 535-554, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:261:y:2022:i:c:s0378377421006107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.