IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v252y2021ics0378377421001943.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of the CSM-CROPGRO-soybean in simulating soybean growth and development and the soil water balance for a tropical environment

Author

Listed:
  • Henrique Figueiredo Moura da Silva, Evandro
  • Boote, Kenneth J.
  • Hoogenboom, Gerrit
  • Gonçalves, Alexandre Ortega
  • Junior, Aderson Soares Andrade
  • Marin, Fabio Ricardo

Abstract

Continuous monitoring of soil water content is a crucial element for sustainable agricultural water management. The goal of this study was to use the Cropping System Model (CSM)-CROPGRO-Soybean model in conjunction with field data to determine the impact of different irrigation regimes, soil texture, and tillage practices on soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] growth, development, and yield for tropical conditions. Field experiments were conducted at two sites: (i) Piracicaba with conventional tillage (PI-1, season 2016–2017), and no-tillage practices (PI-2, season 2017–2018), where the experiments were irrigated with full water requirements; and (ii) Teresina under conventional tillage (season 2019) with two irrigation treatments of full (TE-1) and 50% (TE-2) water requirements. Soil water content was measured for all experiments using an electromagnetic probe installed at several depths. The results showed that the model was able to simulate soybean growth and development for the different sites, with a very good agreement (D-statistic > 0.8) between the simulated and observed data. In addition, the soil water content was simulated with satisfactory accuracy (D-statistic > 0.5). Following model evaluation, long-term hypothetical scenarios for different soil tillage practices and water management regimes were simulated for Piracicaba and Teresina sites. The results showed that the use of no-tillage could reduce the average amount of irrigation in Piracicaba by 30% and in Teresina by 17%, achieving the same yield level as conventional tillage. Thus, the CSM-CROPGRO-Soybean can be used as a tool for determining optimum water management practices for tropical environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrique Figueiredo Moura da Silva, Evandro & Boote, Kenneth J. & Hoogenboom, Gerrit & Gonçalves, Alexandre Ortega & Junior, Aderson Soares Andrade & Marin, Fabio Ricardo, 2021. "Performance of the CSM-CROPGRO-soybean in simulating soybean growth and development and the soil water balance for a tropical environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:252:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421001943
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106929
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377421001943
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106929?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alagarswamy, G. & Singh, P. & Hoogenboom, G. & Wani, S. P. & Pathak, P. & Virmani, S. M., 2000. "Evaluation and application of the CROPGRO-Soybean simulation model in a Vertic Inceptisol," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 19-32, January.
    2. Andales, A. A. & Batchelor, W. D. & Anderson, C. E. & Farnham, D. E. & Whigham, D. K., 2000. "Incorporating tillage effects into a soybean model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 69-98, November.
    3. Liu, H.L. & Yang, J.Y. & Tan, C.S. & Drury, C.F. & Reynolds, W.D. & Zhang, T.Q. & Bai, Y.L. & Jin, J. & He, P. & Hoogenboom, G., 2011. "Simulating water content, crop yield and nitrate-N loss under free and controlled tile drainage with subsurface irrigation using the DSSAT model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(6), pages 1105-1111, April.
    4. Zhou, Hong & Zhao, Wen zhi, 2019. "Modeling soil water balance and irrigation strategies in a flood-irrigated wheat-maize rotation system. A case in dry climate, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 286-302.
    5. Jones, J. W. & Keating, B. A. & Porter, C. H., 2001. "Approaches to modular model development," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 70(2-3), pages 421-443.
    6. Candogan, Burak Nazmi & Sincik, Mehmet & Buyukcangaz, Hakan & Demirtas, Cigdem & Goksoy, Abdurrahim Tanju & Yazgan, Senih, 2013. "Yield, quality and crop water stress index relationships for deficit-irrigated soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in sub-humid climatic conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 113-121.
    7. Salmerón, Montserrat & Purcell, Larry C., 2016. "Simplifying the prediction of phenology with the DSSAT-CROPGRO-soybean model based on relative maturity group and determinacy," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 178-187.
    8. Yang, J.M. & Yang, J.Y. & Liu, S. & Hoogenboom, G., 2014. "An evaluation of the statistical methods for testing the performance of crop models with observed data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 81-89.
    9. da Silva, Evandro H.F.M. & Gonçalves, Alexandre O. & Pereira, Rodolfo A. & Fattori Júnior, Izael M. & Sobenko, Luiz R. & Marin, Fábio R., 2019. "Soybean irrigation requirements and canopy-atmosphere coupling in Southern Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 1-7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Montero Bulacio, Enrique & Romagnoli, Martín & Otegui, María E. & Chan, Raquel L. & Portapila, Margarita, 2023. "OSTRICH-CROPGRO multi-objective optimization methodology for calibration of the growing dynamics of a second-generation transgenic soybean tolerant to high temperatures and dry growing conditions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    2. Park, Sugyeong & Chun, Jong Ahn & Kim, Daeha & Sitthikone, Mounlamai, 2022. "Climate risk management for the rainfed rice yield in Lao PDR using APCC MME seasonal forecasts," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ephrem Habyarimana & Faheem S Baloch, 2021. "Machine learning models based on remote and proximal sensing as potential methods for in-season biomass yields prediction in commercial sorghum fields," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-23, March.
    2. Nasca, J.A. & Feldkamp, C.R. & Arroquy, J.I. & Colombatto, D., 2015. "Efficiency and stability in subtropical beef cattle grazing systems in the northwest of Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 85-96.
    3. Negm, L.M. & Youssef, M.A. & Skaggs, R.W. & Chescheir, G.M. & Jones, J., 2014. "DRAINMOD–DSSAT model for simulating hydrology, soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics, and crop growth for drained crop land," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 30-45.
    4. Amouzou, Kokou Adambounou & Naab, Jesse B. & Lamers, John P.A. & Borgemeister, Christian & Becker, Mathias & Vlek, Paul L.G., 2018. "CROPGRO-Cotton model for determining climate change impacts on yield, water- and N- use efficiencies of cotton in the Dry Savanna of West Africa," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 85-96.
    5. Shi, Xinrui & Batchelor, William D. & Liang, Hao & Li, Sien & Li, Baoguo & Hu, Kelin, 2020. "Determining optimal water and nitrogen management under different initial soil mineral nitrogen levels in northwest China based on a model approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    6. Yi, Jun & Li, Huijie & Zhao, Ying & Shao, Ming'an & Zhang, Hailin & Liu, Muxing, 2022. "Assessing soil water balance to optimize irrigation schedules of flood-irrigated maize fields with different cultivation histories in the arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    7. Marrou, Hélène & Ghanem, Michel Edmond & Amri, Moez & Maalouf, Fouad & Ben Sadoun, Sarah & Kibbou, Fatimaezzhara & Sinclair, Thomas R., 2021. "Restrictive irrigation improves yield and reduces risk for faba bean across the Middle East and North Africa: A modeling study," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    8. França, Ana Carolina Ferreira & Coelho, Rubens Duarte & da Silva Gundim, Alice & de Oliveira Costa, Jéfferson & Quiloango-Chimarro, Carlos Alberto, 2024. "Effects of different irrigation scheduling methods on physiology, yield, and irrigation water productivity of soybean varieties," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    9. Liang, Hao & Lv, Haofeng & Batchelor, William D. & Lian, Xiaojuan & Wang, Zhengxiang & Lin, Shan & Hu, Kelin, 2020. "Simulating nitrate and DON leaching to optimize water and N management practices for greenhouse vegetable production systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    10. Wei, Zheng & Paredes, Paula & Liu, Yu & Chi, Wei Wei & Pereira, Luis S., 2015. "Modelling transpiration, soil evaporation and yield prediction of soybean in North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 43-53.
    11. Kamini Yadav & Hatim M. E. Geli, 2021. "Prediction of Crop Yield for New Mexico Based on Climate and Remote Sensing Data for the 1920–2019 Period," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-27, December.
    12. Huang, Ya & Zhang, Zhe & Li, Zhenhua & Dai, Danqiong & Li, Yanping, 2022. "Evaluation of water use efficiency and optimal irrigation quantity of spring maize in Hetao Irrigation District using the Noah-MP Land Surface Model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    13. Liu, Lining & Wang, Tianshu & Wang, Lichun & Wu, Xun & Zuo, Qiang & Shi, Jianchu & Sheng, Jiandong & Jiang, Pingan & Chen, Quanjia & Ben-Gal, Alon, 2022. "Plant water deficit index-based irrigation under conditions of salinity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    14. Wang, Xiangping & Huang, Guanhua & Yang, Jingsong & Huang, Quanzhong & Liu, Haijun & Yu, Lipeng, 2015. "An assessment of irrigation practices: Sprinkler irrigation of winter wheat in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 197-208.
    15. Kadiyala, M.D.M. & Jones, J.W. & Mylavarapu, R.S. & Li, Y.C. & Reddy, M.D., 2015. "Identifying irrigation and nitrogen best management practices for aerobic rice–maize cropping system for semi-arid tropics using CERES-rice and maize models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 23-32.
    16. Patrick Smith, F. & Holzworth, Dean P. & Robertson, Michael J., 2005. "Linking icon-based models to code-based models: a case study with the agricultural production systems simulator," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 135-151, February.
    17. Salmerόn, Montserrat & Purcell, Larry C. & Vories, Earl D. & Shannon, Grover, 2017. "Simulation of genotype-by-environment interactions on irrigated soybean yields in the U.S. Midsouth," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 120-129.
    18. Beck, Howard & Morgan, Kelly & Jung, Yunchul & Grunwald, Sabine & Kwon, Ho-young & Wu, Jin, 2010. "Ontology-based simulation in agricultural systems modeling," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(7), pages 463-477, September.
    19. Kadigi, Ibrahim L. & Richardson, James W. & Mutabazi, Khamaldin D. & Philip, Damas & Mourice, Sixbert K. & Mbungu, Winfred & Bizimana, Jean-Claude & Sieber, Stefan, 2020. "The effect of nitrogen-fertilizer and optimal plant population on the profitability of maize plots in the Wami River sub-basin, Tanzania: A bio-economic simulation approach," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    20. Katzin, David & van Henten, Eldert J. & van Mourik, Simon, 2022. "Process-based greenhouse climate models: Genealogy, current status, and future directions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:252:y:2021:i:c:s0378377421001943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.