IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v245y2021ics0378377420321880.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analyses of variable and fixed rate irrigation and nitrogen management for maize in different soil types: Part I. Impact on soil-water dynamics and crop evapotranspiration

Author

Listed:
  • Sharma, Vasudha
  • Irmak, Suat

Abstract

Understanding the soil-water dynamics and maize evapotranspiration (ETc) under variable rate irrigation (VRI) and variable rate fertigation (VRF) management with respect to soil spatial variability constitutes the basis for developing effective variable rate water and nitrogen management strategies. This long-term research was designed to quantify and compare the soil-water dynamics, including available water (AW), and ETc during vegetative and reproductive growth periods of VRI, fixed rate irrigation (FRI) and no-irrigation (NI) under fixed rate fertigation (FRF), VRF and pre-plant (PP) nitrogen management in three different soil types [Crete silt loam (S1); Hastings silty clay loam (S2) and Hastings silt loam (S3)] with different topography in the same field under the same environmental and management conditions. The research was conducted in the Irmak Research Laboratory in south central Nebraska, U.S.A., in 2015, 2016 and 2017 maize (Zea mays L.) growing seasons under a variable-rate linear move sprinkler irrigation system. No effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on AW was observed in the vegetative period. Overall, greater AW was observed in S3 as compared with S1 and S2 due to lower elevation. Maize ETc during the vegetative period was significantly (P < 0.05) impacted by soil type in all three years and by nitrogen treatment in two of the three years. The vegetative ETc in S1 was 27 and 19 mm greater than S2 and S3, respectively, for the pooled 2015, 2016 and 2017 data. During the reproductive period, both ETc and AW were impacted by nitrogen and irrigation treatments, but differently in different soil types and years. Average reproductive ETc for FRI and VRI in 2015, 2016 and 2017 was 175 and 178 mm; 294 and 241 mm; 258 and 206 mm, respectively. Averaged across three years, ETc under FRI was significantly (P < 0.05) greater than in VRI; however, in 2015, no significant difference (P > 0.05) in ETc between FRI and VRI was observed in any soil type. Similarly, in 2017, no significant difference in reproductive ETc was observed between VRI and FRI in S1. During reproductive period, averaged across years, soil types and irrigation treatments, the PP nitrogen treatment had greater ETc and lower AW than VRF and FRF. The results indicate that vegetative period ETc was primarily affected by soil type, weather conditions (evaporative demand and soil wetting) and nitrogen fertilizer application timing. The findings of this research showed that soil-water dynamics is a strong function of not only management practices (irrigation and nitrogen treatments), but also soil type, topography and soil physical properties, which all need to be taken into account for effective management of VRI and FRI under VRF, FRF or PP nitrogen management in different soil types. This research quantified the impact of these management practices on soil-water dynamics and ETc which can be used as a guidance.

Suggested Citation

  • Sharma, Vasudha & Irmak, Suat, 2021. "Comparative analyses of variable and fixed rate irrigation and nitrogen management for maize in different soil types: Part I. Impact on soil-water dynamics and crop evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:245:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420321880
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420321880
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106644?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Payero, J.O. & Tarkalson, D.D. & Irmak, S. & Davison, D. & Petersen, J.L., 2009. "Effect of timing of a deficit-irrigation allocation on corn evapotranspiration, yield, water use efficiency and dry mass," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1387-1397, October.
    2. Lenka, S. & Singh, A.K. & Lenka, N.K., 2009. "Water and nitrogen interaction on soil profile water extraction and ET in maize-wheat cropping system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 195-207, February.
    3. Pandey, R. K. & Maranville, J. W. & Admou, A., 2000. "Deficit irrigation and nitrogen effects on maize in a Sahelian environment: I. Grain yield and yield components," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Qadir, M. & Sharma, B.R. & Bruggeman, A. & Choukr-Allah, R. & Karajeh, F., 2007. "Non-conventional water resources and opportunities for water augmentation to achieve food security in water scarce countries," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 87(1), pages 2-22, January.
    5. Zhang, Yongqiang & Kendy, Eloise & Qiang, Yu & Changming, Liu & Yanjun, Shen & Hongyong, Sun, 2004. "Effect of soil water deficit on evapotranspiration, crop yield, and water use efficiency in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 107-122, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hasan Mirzakhaninafchi & Manjeet Singh & Anoop Kumar Dixit & Apoorv Prakash & Shikha Sharda & Jugminder Kaur & Ali Mirzakhani Nafchi, 2022. "Performance Assessment of a Sensor-Based Variable-Rate Real-Time Fertilizer Applicator for Rice Crop," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Wu, Menglong & Xiong, Jiajie & Li, Ruoyu & Dong, Aihong & Lv, Chang & Sun, Dan & Abdelghany, Ahmed Elsayed & Zhang, Qian & Wang, Yaqiong & Siddique, Kadambot H.M. & Niu, Wenquan, 2024. "Precision forecasting of fertilizer components’ concentrations in mixed variable-rate fertigation through machine learning," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rudnick, D.R. & Irmak, S. & Djaman, K. & Sharma, V., 2017. "Impact of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer rate on soil water trends and maize evapotranspiration during the vegetative and reproductive periods," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 77-84.
    2. Wang, Feng & Xie, Ruizhi & Ming, Bo & Wang, Keru & Hou, Peng & Chen, Jianglu & Liu, Guangzhou & Zhang, Guoqiang & Xue, Jun & Li, Shaokun, 2021. "Dry matter accumulation after silking and kernel weight are the key factors for increasing maize yield and water use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    3. Comas, Louise H. & Trout, Thomas J. & DeJonge, Kendall C. & Zhang, Huihui & Gleason, Sean M., 2019. "Water productivity under strategic growth stage-based deficit irrigation in maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 433-440.
    4. Kukal, M.S. & Irmak, S., 2020. "Impact of irrigation on interannual variability in United States agricultural productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    5. Hao, Baozhen & Xue, Qingwu & Marek, Thomas H. & Jessup, Kirk E. & Hou, Xiaobo & Xu, Wenwei & Bynum, Edsel D. & Bean, Brent W., 2015. "Soil water extraction, water use, and grain yield by drought-tolerant maize on the Texas High Plains," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 11-21.
    6. Ma, Shou-Chen & Zhang, Wei-Qiang & Duan, Ai-Wang & Wang, Tong-Chao, 2019. "Effects of controlling soil moisture regime based on root-sourced signal characteristics on yield formation and water use efficiency of winter wheat," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 486-492.
    7. El-Hendawy, Salah E. & Schmidhalter, Urs, 2010. "Optimal coupling combinations between irrigation frequency and rate for drip-irrigated maize grown on sandy soil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(3), pages 439-448, March.
    8. Geerts, Sam & Raes, Dirk, 2009. "Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 96(9), pages 1275-1284, September.
    9. Greaves, Geneille E. & Wang, Yu-Min, 2017. "Effect of regulated deficit irrigation scheduling on water use of corn in southern Taiwan tropical environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 115-125.
    10. Wang, Dan & Mo, Yan & Li, Guangyong & Wilkerson, Carol Jo & Hoogenboom, Gerrit, 2021. "Improving maize production and decreasing nitrogen residue in soil using mulched drip fertigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    11. Kresović, Branka & Tapanarova, Angelina & Tomić, Zorica & Životić, Ljubomir & Vujović, Dragan & Sredojević, Zorica & Gajić, Boško, 2016. "Grain yield and water use efficiency of maize as influenced by different irrigation regimes through sprinkler irrigation under temperate climate," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 34-43.
    12. Rashki, Paria & piri, halimeh & Khamari, Eisa, 2022. "Determining the production function and optimal irrigation depth of Roselle in deficit irrigation conditions and using potassium fertilizer," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    13. Mohammed, Ali T. & Irmak, Suat, 2022. "Maize response to coupled irrigation and nitrogen fertilization under center pivot, subsurface drip and surface (furrow) irrigation: Soil-water dynamics and crop evapotranspiration," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    14. Guo, Jinjin & Fan, Junliang & Xiang, Youzhen & Zhang, Fucang & Yan, Shicheng & Zhang, Xueyan & Zheng, Jing & Li, Yuepeng & Tang, Zijun & Li, Zhijun, 2022. "Coupling effects of irrigation amount and nitrogen fertilizer type on grain yield, water productivity and nitrogen use efficiency of drip-irrigated maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    15. Garg, N.K. & Dadhich, Sushmita M., 2014. "A proposed method to determine yield response factors of different crops under deficit irrigation using inverse formulation approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 68-74.
    16. Gheysari, Mahdi & Sadeghi, Sayed-Hossein & Loescher, Henry W. & Amiri, Samia & Zareian, Mohammad Javad & Majidi, Mohammad M. & Asgarinia, Parvaneh & Payero, Jose O., 2017. "Comparison of deficit irrigation management strategies on root, plant growth and biomass productivity of silage maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 126-138.
    17. Shrestha, Nirman & Raes, Dirk & Vanuytrecht, Eline & Sah, Shrawan Kumar, 2013. "Cereal yield stabilization in Terai (Nepal) by water and soil fertility management modeling," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 53-62.
    18. Allakonon, M. Gloriose B. & Zakari, Sissou & Tovihoudji, Pierre G. & Fatondji, A. Sènami & Akponikpè, P.B. Irénikatché, 2022. "Grain yield, actual evapotranspiration and water productivity responses of maize crop to deficit irrigation: A global meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    19. Dutta, S. K & Laing, Alison M. & Kumar, S. & Gathala, Mahesh K. & Singh, Ajoy K. & Gaydon, D.S. & Poulton, P., 2020. "Improved water management practices improve cropping system profitability and smallholder farmers’ incomes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    20. Kaur, Rajbir & Arora, VK, 2019. "Deep tillage and residue mulch effects on productivity and water and nitrogen economy of spring maize in north-west India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 724-731.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:245:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420321880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.