IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v244y2021ics0378377420320850.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cotton irrigation scheduling improvements using wetting front detectors in Uzbekistan

Author

Listed:
  • Ibragimov, Nazirbay
  • Avliyakulov, Mirzoolim
  • Durdiev, Normat
  • Evett, Steven R.
  • Gopporov, Farruhjon
  • Yakhyoeva, Nafisa

Abstract

Previous research established growth-stage-specific irrigation scheduling for upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) in Uzbekistan. We report further investigation of irrigation scheduling for two cotton varieties and its effect on seed-lint yield and irrigation crop water productivity with and without use of a wetting front detector (WFD) to trigger irrigation cessation. A WFD is a device buried in the soil to sense when the wetting front from irrigation reaches a certain depth. The depth may be adjusted upon installation of the WFD. Field trials were conducted in silt loam soil near Tashkent, Uzbekistan, in 2016, 2017, and 2018. The growth stages of germination to flowering, flowering to boll formation, and maturation were considered for the development of irrigation scheduling regimes with respect to field capacity water content (Fc). The best growth, development and seed-lint yield for the Sultan cotton variety were achieved with irrigations scheduled at soil water content levels of 70%, 75%, and 65% of Fc during the aforementioned three growth stages, respectively, and were achieved for variety UzPITI-103 with irrigations scheduled at 70%, 70%, and 60% of Fc during the aforementioned plant growth stages, respectively. There were appreciable varietal differences in water requirement with the early maturing Sultan variety having a larger water requirement. In contrast, irrigation scheduling with larger Fc values did not result in increasing the yield for the UzPITI-103 cotton variety. In comparison with irrigation without WFD, the use of the WFD decreased irrigation duration by 2.0–3.5 h, net irrigation amount by 7–90 m3ha−1, irrigation run off by 69–134 m3ha−1, and deep percolation below the root zone by 10–17 m3ha−1, while increasing irrigation crop water productivity by 0.08–0.10 kg m−3 and seed-lint yield by 0.04–0.10 Mgha−1. Irrigation scheduling regimes based on percentages of Fc and irrigation with WFD should be considered applicable practices for upland cotton varieties on silt loam soils of the central zone of Uzbekistan and for similar soil-climatic conditions of Central Asian countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Ibragimov, Nazirbay & Avliyakulov, Mirzoolim & Durdiev, Normat & Evett, Steven R. & Gopporov, Farruhjon & Yakhyoeva, Nafisa, 2021. "Cotton irrigation scheduling improvements using wetting front detectors in Uzbekistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:244:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420320850
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377420320850
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106538?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Levidow, Les & Zaccaria, Daniele & Maia, Rodrigo & Vivas, Eduardo & Todorovic, Mladen & Scardigno, Alessandra, 2014. "Improving water-efficient irrigation: Prospects and difficulties of innovative practices," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 84-94.
    2. Faures, J. M. & Svendsen, M. & Turral, Hugh & Berkhoff, J. & Bhattarai, M. & Caliz, A. M. & Darghouth, S. & Doukkali, M. R. & El-Kady, M. & Facon, T. & Gopalakrishnan, M. & Groenfeldt, D. & Hoanh, Chu, 2007. "Reinventing irrigation," IWMI Books, Reports H040202, International Water Management Institute.
    3. Ibragimov, Nazirbay & Evett, Steven R. & Esanbekov, Yusupbek & Kamilov, Bakhtiyor S. & Mirzaev, Lutfullo & Lamers, John P.A., 2007. "Water use efficiency of irrigated cotton in Uzbekistan under drip and furrow irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 90(1-2), pages 112-120, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Han, Shumin & Xin, Ping & Li, Huilong & Yang, Yonghui, 2022. "Evolution of agricultural development and land-water-food nexus in Central Asia," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Srivastava, P.K. & Singh, Raj Mohan, 2016. "GIS based integrated modelling framework for agricultural canal system simulation and management in Indo-Gangetic plains of India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 37-47.
    2. Fan, Yubing & Wang, Chenggang & Nan, Zhibiao, 2018. "Determining water use efficiency of wheat and cotton: A meta-regression analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 48-60.
    3. Komlan Koudahe & Aleksey Y. Sheshukov & Jonathan Aguilar & Koffi Djaman, 2021. "Irrigation-Water Management and Productivity of Cotton: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-21, September.
    4. Kenjabaev, Shavkat & Forkutsa, I. & Bach, M. & Frede, H.-G., 2013. "Performance evaluation of the BUDGET model in simulating cotton and wheat yield and soil moisture in Fergana valley," International Conference and Young Researchers Forum - Natural Resource Use in Central Asia: Institutional Challenges and the Contribution of Capacity Building 159114, University of Giessen (JLU Giessen), Center for International Development and Environmental Research.
    5. Lankford, B. & Makin, Ian & Matthews, N. & McCornick, Peter G. & Noble, A. & Shah, Tushaar, "undated". "A compact to revitalise large-scale irrigation systems using a leadership-partnership-ownership 'Theory of Change'," Papers published in Journals (Open Access) H047459, International Water Management Institute.
    6. Bopp, Carlos & Jara-Rojas, Roberto & Bravo-Ureta, Boris & Engler, Alejandra, 2022. "Irrigation water use, shadow values and productivity: Evidence from stochastic production frontiers in vineyards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    7. Gurib-Fakim, A. & Smith, L. & Acikgoz, N. & Avato, P. & Bossio, Deborah & Ebi, K. & Goncalves, A. & Heinemann, J. A. & Herrmann, T. M. & Padgham, J. & Pennarz, J. & Scheidegger, U. & Sebastian, L. & T, 2009. "Options to enhance the impact of AKST on development and sustainability goals," IWMI Books, Reports H042792, International Water Management Institute.
    8. Marjan Aziz & Madeeha Khan & Naveeda Anjum & Muhammad Sultan & Redmond R. Shamshiri & Sobhy M. Ibrahim & Siva K. Balasundram & Muhammad Aleem, 2022. "Scientific Irrigation Scheduling for Sustainable Production in Olive Groves," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, April.
    9. Ping Wang & Zhenyong Zhao & Lei Wang & Changyan Tian, 2021. "Comparison of Efficiency-Enhanced Management and Conventional Management of Irrigation and Nitrogen Fertilization in Cotton Fields of Northwestern China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-11, November.
    10. Mohammed Wazed, Saeed & Hughes, Ben Richard & O’Connor, Dominic & Kaiser Calautit, John, 2018. "A review of sustainable solar irrigation systems for Sub-Saharan Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1206-1225.
    11. Fan, Yubing & McCann, Laura M., 2017. "Farmers’ Adoption of Pressure Irrigation Systems and Scientific Scheduling Practices: An Application of Multilevel Models," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258458, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Liang, Hao & Lv, Haofeng & Batchelor, William D. & Lian, Xiaojuan & Wang, Zhengxiang & Lin, Shan & Hu, Kelin, 2020. "Simulating nitrate and DON leaching to optimize water and N management practices for greenhouse vegetable production systems," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    13. Zhou, Xinyao & Zhang, Yongqiang & Sheng, Zhuping & Manevski, Kiril & Andersen, Mathias N. & Han, Shumin & Li, Huilong & Yang, Yonghui, 2021. "Did water-saving irrigation protect water resources over the past 40 years? A global analysis based on water accounting framework," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    14. Geries, L.S.M. & El-Shahawy, T.A. & Moursi, E.A., 2021. "Cut-off irrigation as an effective tool to increase water-use efficiency, enhance productivity, quality and storability of some onion cultivars," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    15. Pongspikul, Tayatorn & McCann, Laura M., 2020. "Farmers’ Adoption of Pressure Irrigation Systems: The Case of Cotton Producers in the Southeastern versus Southwestern U.S," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304332, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Peragón, Juan M. & Pérez-Latorre, Francisco J. & Delgado, Antonio & Tóth, Tibor, 2018. "Best management irrigation practices assessed by a GIS-based decision tool for reducing salinization risks in olive orchards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 33-41.
    17. Fan, Yubing & Wang, Chenggang & Nan, Zhibiao, 2014. "Comparative evaluation of crop water use efficiency, economic analysis and net household profit simulation in arid Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 335-345.
    18. Gonzalo Villa‐Cox & Francesco Cavazza & Cristian Jordan & Mijail Arias‐Hidalgo & Paúl Herrera & Ramon Espinel & Davide Viaggi & Stijn Speelman, 2021. "Understanding constraints on private irrigation adoption decisions under uncertainty in data constrained settings: A novel empirical approach tested on Ecuadorian Cocoa cultivations," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 52(6), pages 985-999, November.
    19. Yang, Jia & Ren, Wei & Ouyang, Ying & Feng, Gary & Tao, Bo & Granger, Joshua J. & Poudel, Krishna P., 2019. "Projection of 21st century irrigation water requirement across the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 60-72.
    20. Ireneusz Cymes & Ewa Dragańska & Zbigniew Brodziński, 2022. "Potential Possibilities of Using Groundwater for Crop Irrigation in the Context of Climate Change," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:244:y:2021:i:c:s0378377420320850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.