IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v233y2020ics0378377419320785.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance of SAFER evapotranspiration using missing meteorological data

Author

Listed:
  • Santos, Jannaylton Everton Oliveira
  • Cunha, Fernando França da
  • Filgueiras, Roberto
  • Silva, Gustavo Henrique da
  • Castro Teixeira, Antônio Heriberto de
  • Santos Silva, Francisco Charles dos
  • Sediyama, Gilberto Chohaku

Abstract

The Simple Algorithm for Evapotranspiration Retrieving (SAFER) can be used to estimate surface evapotranspiration. In the process of SAFER parameterization, the reference evapotranspiration (ETo) calculated by the Penman-Monteith (PM) method was included. However, methodologies for estimating ETo that use fewer meteorological variables should be sought, mainly to increase the applicability of the method in regions where there are no complete weather stations. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of the ETo calculated with estimated data on the calculation of surface evapotranspiration using SAFER (ETSAFER) in the Brazilian semiarid region. The study was carried out in areas of centre pivots cultivated with sugarcane located in the public irrigated perimeter of Jaíba, MG, Brazil. ETo and its impact on ETSAFER were analysed using meteorological data from a station belonging to the National Institute of Meteorology (INMET) as well as data from 19 images of the Landsat 8 satellite from 2013, 2014 and 2016. The ETSAFER responses were analysed from the calculations of ETo estimated by the Hargreaves-Samani (HS) and PM methods with missing data including single absences of solar radiation (RS), wind speed (U2), relative humidity (RH) and combined absences of U2 and RH, U2, RH and RS, RS and U2, and RS and RH. The temporal and spatial variability of ETSAFER for sugarcane crops was assessed. RS was the parameter that most affected ETo and, consequently, ETSAFER. ETSAFER was underestimated when calculated using the ETo estimated by PM with missing RS data and overestimated when the ETo was calculated by HS. In the absence of single or combined data of U2 and RH, it is recommended to estimate ETo by PM with missing data for the calculation of ETSAFER. It is not advised to use the ETo obtained by the HS method for calculating ETSAFER in semiarid regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Santos, Jannaylton Everton Oliveira & Cunha, Fernando França da & Filgueiras, Roberto & Silva, Gustavo Henrique da & Castro Teixeira, Antônio Heriberto de & Santos Silva, Francisco Charles dos & Sediy, 2020. "Performance of SAFER evapotranspiration using missing meteorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:233:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419320785
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106076
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419320785
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106076?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Yang & Cui, Yuanlai & Bai, Kaihua & Luo, Tongyuan & Dai, Junfeng & Wang, Weiguang & Luo, Yufeng, 2019. "Short-term forecasting of daily reference evapotranspiration using the reduced-set Penman-Monteith model and public weather forecasts," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 70-80.
    2. Elnmer, Ayat & Khadr, Mosaad & Kanae, Shinjiro & Tawfik, Ahmed, 2019. "Mapping daily and seasonally evapotranspiration using remote sensing techniques over the Nile delta," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 682-692.
    3. Olivera-Guerra, Luis & Merlin, Olivier & Er-Raki, Salah & Khabba, Saïd & Escorihuela, Maria Jose, 2018. "Estimating the water budget components of irrigated crops: Combining the FAO-56 dual crop coefficient with surface temperature and vegetation index data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 120-131.
    4. Singh Rawat, Kishan & Kumar Singh, Sudhir & Bala, Anju & Szabó, Szilárd, 2019. "Estimation of crop evapotranspiration through spatial distributed crop coefficient in a semi-arid environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 922-933.
    5. Paredes, P. & Pereira, L.S., 2019. "Computing FAO56 reference grass evapotranspiration PM-ETo from temperature with focus on solar radiation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 86-102.
    6. Bingham, N. H., 1996. "The sample mid-range and interquartiles," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 131-136, April.
    7. Mahmoud, Shereif H. & Gan, Thian Yew, 2019. "Irrigation water management in arid regions of Middle East: Assessing spatio-temporal variation of actual evapotranspiration through remote sensing techniques and meteorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 35-47.
    8. Ali Mokhtari & Hamideh Noory & Majid Vazifedoust, 2018. "Performance of Different Surface Incoming Solar Radiation Models and Their Impacts on Reference Evapotranspiration," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 32(9), pages 3053-3070, July.
    9. Rahimzadegan, Majid & Janani, AdelehalSadat, 2019. "Estimating evapotranspiration of pistachio crop based on SEBAL algorithm using Landsat 8 satellite imagery," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 383-390.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Teixeira, Antônio & Leivas, Janice & Struiving, Tiago & Reis, João & Simão, Fúlvio, 2021. "Energy balance and irrigation performance assessments in lemon orchards by applying the SAFER algorithm to Landsat 8 images," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    2. Elbeltagi, Ahmed & Deng, Jinsong & Wang, Ke & Malik, Anurag & Maroufpoor, Saman, 2020. "Modeling long-term dynamics of crop evapotranspiration using deep learning in a semi-arid environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    3. Vásquez, Cristina & Célleri, Rolando & Córdova, Mario & Carrillo-Rojas, Galo, 2022. "Improving reference evapotranspiration (ETo) calculation under limited data conditions in the high Tropical Andes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiang, Keyu & Li, Yi & Horton, Robert & Feng, Hao, 2020. "Similarity and difference of potential evapotranspiration and reference crop evapotranspiration – a review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. Paredes, P. & Pereira, L.S. & Almorox, J. & Darouich, H., 2020. "Reference grass evapotranspiration with reduced data sets: Parameterization of the FAO Penman-Monteith temperature approach and the Hargeaves-Samani equation using local climatic variables," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    3. Nouri, Milad & Homaee, Mehdi, 2022. "Reference crop evapotranspiration for data-sparse regions using reanalysis products," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    4. Qiu, Rangjian & Luo, Yufeng & Wu, Jingwei & Zhang, Baozhong & Liu, Zhihe & Agathokleous, Evgenios & Yang, Xiumei & Hu, Wei & Clothier, Brent, 2023. "Short–term forecasting of daily evapotranspiration from rice using a modified Priestley–Taylor model and public weather forecasts," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    5. Qiu, Rangjian & Li, Longan & Liu, Chunwei & Wang, Zhenchang & Zhang, Baozhong & Liu, Zhandong, 2022. "Evapotranspiration estimation using a modified crop coefficient model in a rotated rice-winter wheat system," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    6. Paredes, Paula & Trigo, Isabel & de Bruin, Henk & Simões, Nuno & Pereira, Luis S., 2021. "Daily grass reference evapotranspiration with Meteosat Second Generation shortwave radiation and reference ET products," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    7. Lai, Chengguang & Chen, Xiaohong & Zhong, Ruida & Wang, Zhaoli, 2022. "Implication of climate variable selections on the uncertainty of reference crop evapotranspiration projections propagated from climate variables projections under climate change," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    8. Pereira, L.S. & Paredes, P. & Jovanovic, N., 2020. "Soil water balance models for determining crop water and irrigation requirements and irrigation scheduling focusing on the FAO56 method and the dual Kc approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    9. Haofang Yan & Song Huang & Jianyun Zhang & Chuan Zhang & Guoqing Wang & Lanlan Li & Shuang Zhao & Mi Li & Baoshan Zhao, 2022. "Comparison of Shuttleworth–Wallace and Dual Crop Coefficient Method for Estimating Evapotranspiration of a Tea Field in Southeast China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Amazirh, Abdelhakim & Merlin, Olivier & Er-Raki, Salah & Bouras, Elhoussaine & Chehbouni, Abdelghani, 2021. "Implementing a new texture-based soil evaporation reduction coefficient in the FAO dual crop coefficient method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 250(C).
    11. Ouaadi, Nadia & Jarlan, Lionel & Khabba, Saïd & Le Page, Michel & Chakir, Adnane & Er-Raki, Salah & Frison, Pierre-Louis, 2023. "Are the C-band backscattering coefficient and interferometric coherence suitable substitutes of NDVI for the monitoring of the FAO-56 crop coefficient?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    12. Ferreira, Lucas Borges & da Cunha, Fernando França & Fernandes Filho, Elpídio Inácio, 2022. "Exploring machine learning and multi-task learning to estimate meteorological data and reference evapotranspiration across Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    13. Ahmed A. Abdelmoneim & Roula Khadra & Angela Elkamouh & Bilal Derardja & Giovanna Dragonetti, 2023. "Towards Affordable Precision Irrigation: An Experimental Comparison of Weather-Based and Soil Water Potential-Based Irrigation Using Low-Cost IoT-Tensiometers on Drip Irrigated Lettuce," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    14. Machakaire, A.T.B. & Steyn, J.M. & Franke, A.C., 2021. "Assessing evapotranspiration and crop coefficients of potato in a semi-arid climate using Eddy Covariance techniques," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    15. Soumyashree Dixit & V. Neethin & K. V. Jayakumar, 2023. "Assessment of Crop-Drought Relationship: A Climate Change Perspective," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(10), pages 4075-4095, August.
    16. Filgueiras, Roberto & Almeida, Thomé Simpliciano & Mantovani, Everardo Chartuni & Dias, Santos Henrique Brant & Fernandes-Filho, Elpídio Inácio & da Cunha, Fernando França & Venancio, Luan Peroni, 2020. "Soil water content and actual evapotranspiration predictions using regression algorithms and remote sensing data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    17. Zhang, Yu & Han, Wenting & Zhang, Huihui & Niu, Xiaotao & Shao, Guomin, 2023. "Evaluating maize evapotranspiration using high-resolution UAV-based imagery and FAO-56 dual crop coefficient approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    18. Shih-Lun Fang & Yi-Shan Lin & Sheng-Chih Chang & Yi-Lung Chang & Bing-Yun Tsai & Bo-Jein Kuo, 2024. "Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms to Estimate and Short-Term Forecast the Daily Reference Evapotranspiration with Limited Meteorological Variables," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Nagat Ahmed Elmulthum & Faisal Ibrahim Zeineldin & Suliman Ali Al-Khateeb & Khalid Mohammed Al-Barrak & Tagelsir Ahmed Mohammed & Muhammad Naeem Sattar & Akbar S. Mohmand, 2023. "Water Use Efficiency and Economic Evaluation of the Hydroponic versus Conventional Cultivation Systems for Green Fodder Production in Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    20. Han Chen & Ziqi Zhou & Han Li & Yizhao Wei & Jinhui (Jeanne) Huang & Hong Liang & Weimin Wang, 2023. "Evaluation the Performance of Three Types of Two-Source Evapotranspiration Models in Urban Woodland Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:233:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419320785. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.