IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v229y2020ics0378377419316026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Permanent wilting point plays an important role in simulating winter wheat growth under water deficit conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Yao, Ning
  • Li, Yi
  • Xu, Fang
  • Liu, Jian
  • Chen, Shang
  • Ma, Haijiao
  • Wai Chau, Henry
  • Liu, De Li
  • Li, Meng
  • Feng, Hao
  • Yu, Qiang
  • He, Jianqiang

Abstract

Soil parameters related to soil water holding capacity could play an important role in simulating winter wheat growth under severe soil water stress, which could heavily influence the simulated soil water contents, and then biomass and final yield. In this study, a field experiment of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was conducted in two consecutive growing seasons (2012–2014) under rainfall shelter in arid areas of China, with the purpose to identify to what extent the soil parameters could influence the simulated output variables in the DSSAT-CERES-Wheat model under water stress conditions. The permanent wilting point (PWP), which were initially indirectly measured based on soil sampling, were manually tuned through a trial-and-error method based on field observations of soil water content and aboveground biomass. The results showed that the maximum advancing of maturity date was about five days under water stress conditions. The stages of returning green and grain-filling were critical periods for agricultural water management of winter wheat in arid areas. The relative mean absolute error (RMAE) of simulated and observed variables were almost all less than 20% when water stress occurred at the heading and grain-filling stages. However, there were relatively large simulation errors when water stress occurred at the wintering and returning green stages. In addition, the CERES-Wheat model did not correctly simulate the discrepancies in phenology dates of winter wheat. The overall averaged root mean square error of all treatments for total water storage in 0−100 cm soil layer and winter wheat biomass decreased to 0.3 mm and 750 kg ha−1 after manually tuning the initially indirectly measured value of PWP. In general, the CERES-Wheat model showed some limitations to simulate winter growth under complicated arid conditions. Meanwhile, the measurement uncertainty in soil parameter PWP could introduce large simulation errors in simulating crop growth response to severe water stress conditions. We suggest the soil parameter PWP should be more carefully calibrated based on relevant field observations since it is related to crop type and difficult to be directly and precisely measured. In general, it is necessary to further research into the responding mechanism and simulation of winter wheat growth to water stress in liable-drought areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Yao, Ning & Li, Yi & Xu, Fang & Liu, Jian & Chen, Shang & Ma, Haijiao & Wai Chau, Henry & Liu, De Li & Li, Meng & Feng, Hao & Yu, Qiang & He, Jianqiang, 2020. "Permanent wilting point plays an important role in simulating winter wheat growth under water deficit conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:229:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419316026
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419316026
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105954?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Romanowicz, Renata J. & Beven, Keith J., 2006. "Comments on generalised likelihood uncertainty estimation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1315-1321.
    2. He, Jianqiang & Jones, James W. & Graham, Wendy D. & Dukes, Michael D., 2010. "Influence of likelihood function choice for estimating crop model parameters using the generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation method," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(5), pages 256-264, June.
    3. Campos, Isidro & Balbontín, Claudio & González-Piqueras, Jose & González-Dugo, Maria P. & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Calera, Alfonso, 2016. "Combining a water balance model with evapotranspiration measurements to estimate total available soil water in irrigated and rainfed vineyards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 141-152.
    4. Attia, Ahmed & Rajan, Nithya & Xue, Qingwu & Nair, Shyam & Ibrahim, Amir & Hays, Dirk, 2016. "Application of DSSAT-CERES-Wheat model to simulate winter wheat response to irrigation management in the Texas High Plains," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 50-60.
    5. Kang, Shaozhong & Zhang, Lu & Liang, Yinli & Hu, Xiaotao & Cai, Huanjie & Gu, Binjie, 2002. "Effects of limited irrigation on yield and water use efficiency of winter wheat in the Loess Plateau of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 203-216, June.
    6. Langensiepen, M. & Hanus, H. & Schoop, P. & Gräsle, W., 2008. "Validating CERES-wheat under North-German environmental conditions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 97(1-2), pages 34-47, April.
    7. DeJonge, K.C. & Ascough, J.C. & Andales, A.A. & Hansen, N.C. & Garcia, L.A. & Arabi, M., 2012. "Improving evapotranspiration simulations in the CERES-Maize model under limited irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 92-103.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeng, Ruiyun & Lin, Xiaomao & Welch, Stephen M. & Yang, Shanshan & Huang, Na & Sassenrath, Gretchen F. & Yao, Fengmei, 2023. "Impact of water deficit and irrigation management on winter wheat yield in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 287(C).
    2. Xiang, Keyu & Li, Yi & Horton, Robert & Feng, Hao, 2020. "Similarity and difference of potential evapotranspiration and reference crop evapotranspiration – a review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    3. Yingnan Wei & Han Ru & Xiaolan Leng & Zhijian He & Olusola O. Ayantobo & Tehseen Javed & Ning Yao, 2022. "Better Performance of the Modified CERES-Wheat Model in Simulating Evapotranspiration and Wheat Growth under Water Stress Conditions," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Ouaadi, Nadia & Jarlan, Lionel & Khabba, Saïd & Le Page, Michel & Chakir, Adnane & Er-Raki, Salah & Frison, Pierre-Louis, 2023. "Are the C-band backscattering coefficient and interferometric coherence suitable substitutes of NDVI for the monitoring of the FAO-56 crop coefficient?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Chen, Shang & He, Liang & Cao, Yinxuan & Wang, Runhong & Wu, Lianhai & Wang, Zhao & Zou, Yufeng & Siddique, Kadambot H.M. & Xiong, Wei & Liu, Manshuang & Feng, Hao & Yu, Qiang & Wang, Xiaoming & He, J, 2021. "Comparisons among four different upscaling strategies for cultivar genetic parameters in rainfed spring wheat phenology simulations with the DSSAT-CERES-Wheat model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    6. You, Yang & Wang, Yakun & Fan, Xiaodong & Dai, Qin & Yang, Guang & Wang, Wene & Chen, Dianyu & Hu, Xiaotao, 2024. "Progress in joint application of crop models and hydrological models," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    7. Attia, Ahmed & El-Hendawy, Salah & Al-Suhaibani, Nasser & Alotaibi, Majed & Tahir, Muhammad Usman & Kamal, Khaled Y., 2021. "Evaluating deficit irrigation scheduling strategies to improve yield and water productivity of maize in arid environment using simulation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Attia, Ahmed & El-Hendawy, Salah & Al-Suhaibani, Nasser & Alotaibi, Majed & Tahir, Muhammad Usman & Kamal, Khaled Y., 2021. "Evaluating deficit irrigation scheduling strategies to improve yield and water productivity of maize in arid environment using simulation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    2. Zhong, Honglin & Sun, Laixiang & Fischer, Günther & Tian, Zhan & van Velthuizen, Harrij & Liang, Zhuoran, 2017. "Mission Impossible? Maintaining regional grain production level and recovering local groundwater table by cropping system adaptation across the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Zhang, Chao & Xie, Ziang & Wang, Qiaojuan & Tang, Min & Feng, Shaoyuan & Cai, Huanjie, 2022. "AquaCrop modeling to explore optimal irrigation of winter wheat for improving grain yield and water productivity," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    4. Kothari, Kritika & Ale, Srinivasulu & Bordovsky, James P. & Thorp, Kelly R. & Porter, Dana O. & Munster, Clyde L., 2019. "Simulation of efficient irrigation management strategies for grain sorghum production over different climate variability classes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 49-62.
    5. Mansour, Elsayed & Abdul-Hamid, Mohamed I & Yasin, Mohamed T & Qabil, Naglaa & Attia, Ahmed, 2017. "Identifying drought-tolerant genotypes of barley and their responses to various irrigation levels in a Mediterranean environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 58-67.
    6. Zhao, Jie & Han, Tong & Wang, Chong & Jia, Hao & Worqlul, Abeyou W. & Norelli, Nicole & Zeng, Zhaohai & Chu, Qingquan, 2020. "Optimizing irrigation strategies to synchronously improve the yield and water productivity of winter wheat under interannual precipitation variability in the North China Plain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    7. Helman, David & Bonfil, David J. & Lensky, Itamar M., 2019. "Crop RS-Met: A biophysical evapotranspiration and root-zone soil water content model for crops based on proximal sensing and meteorological data," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 210-219.
    8. Si, Zhuanyun & Zain, Muhammad & Li, Shuang & Liu, Junming & Liang, Yueping & Gao, Yang & Duan, Aiwang, 2021. "Optimizing nitrogen application for drip-irrigated winter wheat using the DSSAT-CERES-Wheat model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    9. Meena, Raj Pal & Karnam, Venkatesh & R, Sendhil & Rinki, & Sharma, R.K. & Tripathi, S.C. & Singh, Gyanendra Pratap, 2019. "Identification of water use efficient wheat genotypes with high yield for regions of depleting water resources in India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Gonçalves, Ivo Zution & Mekonnen, Mesfin M. & Neale, Christopher M.U. & Campos, Isidro & Neale, Michael R., 2020. "Temporal and spatial variations of irrigation water use for commercial corn fields in Central Nebraska," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    11. Mompremier, R. & Her, Y. & Hoogenboom, G. & Migliaccio, K. & Muñoz-Carpena, R. & Brym, Z. & Colbert, R.W. & Jeune, W., 2021. "Modeling the response of dry bean yield to irrigation water availability controlled by watershed hydrology," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    12. Bispo, R.C. & Hernandez, F.B.T. & Gonçalves, I.Z. & Neale, C.M.U. & Teixeira, A.H.C., 2022. "Remote sensing based evapotranspiration modeling for sugarcane in Brazil using a hybrid approach," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    13. Zhang, Buchong & Li, Feng-Min & Huang, Gaobao & Cheng, Zi-Yong & Zhang, Yanhong, 2006. "Yield performance of spring wheat improved by regulated deficit irrigation in an arid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 28-42, January.
    14. Kang, Shaozhong & Hao, Xinmei & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Su, Xiaoling & Lu, Hongna & Li, Xiaolin & Huo, Zailin & Li, Sien & Ding, Risheng, 2017. "Improving agricultural water productivity to ensure food security in China under changing environment: From research to practice," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 5-17.
    15. Chen, Shang & He, Liang & Cao, Yinxuan & Wang, Runhong & Wu, Lianhai & Wang, Zhao & Zou, Yufeng & Siddique, Kadambot H.M. & Xiong, Wei & Liu, Manshuang & Feng, Hao & Yu, Qiang & Wang, Xiaoming & He, J, 2021. "Comparisons among four different upscaling strategies for cultivar genetic parameters in rainfed spring wheat phenology simulations with the DSSAT-CERES-Wheat model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    16. Yan Shan & Mingbin Huang & Paul Harris & Lianhai Wu, 2021. "A Sensitivity Analysis of the SPACSYS Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-30, July.
    17. He, Gang & Wang, Zhaohui & Li, Fucui & Dai, Jian & Li, Qiang & Xue, Cheng & Cao, Hanbing & Wang, Sen & Malhi, Sukhdev S., 2016. "Soil water storage and winter wheat productivity affected by soil surface management and precipitation in dryland of the Loess Plateau, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1-9.
    18. Vedran Krevh & Lana Filipović & Jasmina Defterdarović & Igor Bogunović & Yonggen Zhang & Zoran Kovač & Andrew Barton & Vilim Filipović, 2023. "Investigating Near-Surface Hydrologic Connectivity in a Grass-Covered Inter-Row Area of a Hillslope Vineyard Using Field Monitoring and Numerical Simulations," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Deng, Xi-Ping & Shan, Lun & Zhang, Heping & Turner, Neil C., 2006. "Improving agricultural water use efficiency in arid and semiarid areas of China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 80(1-3), pages 23-40, February.
    20. Fan, Yubing & Wang, Chenggang & Nan, Zhibiao, 2014. "Comparative evaluation of crop water use efficiency, economic analysis and net household profit simulation in arid Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 335-345.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:229:y:2020:i:c:s0378377419316026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.