IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v224y2019ic13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of economic returns by using a central pivot system to irrigate common beans during the rainfed season in Central Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Justino, Ludmilla Ferreira
  • Alves Júnior, José
  • Battisti, Rafael
  • Heinemann, Alexandre Bryan
  • Leite, Caio Vinicius
  • Evangelista, Adão Wagner Pêgo
  • Casaroli, Derblai

Abstract

Irrigation improves yield, but can create conflicts with other water uses during dry periods. Based on this, the aim of this study is to assess the economic returns provided by irrigation of common beans during the rainfed season in Central Brazil. Common bean yield was simulated for 30 growing seasons using the crop model DSSAT-CROPGRO-Drybean, with parameters calibrated for the cultivar Pérola. The yield simulations considered sowing dates from Nov. 01 to Jan. 01 at each 15 days, and four water managements: rainfed and irrigation starting at 70, 50 and 30% of the total soil water available (TSWA). Yield and irrigation costs were obtained from official institutes that assess net revenue considering sales prices from R$ 1.33 to R$ 5.00 per kg. The rainfed system yield ranged from 500 to 3000 kg ha−1. The irrigation at 70, 50 and 30% of TWSA increased yield, respectively, from 26.7 to 41.4%, from 5.5 to 14.5%, and from 0.4 to 2.4% in relation to the rainfed system with ranges depending on sowing dates. The average demand of 53 mm cycle−1 (range between 0 to 100 mm cycle−1) was required by the water management 70% of TSWA. However, the 50% of TSWA required an average demand of 19 mm cycle−1, and the 30% of TSWA in most growing seasons did not require irrigation. The net revenue was affected by sales prices and sowing dates (preferentially early sowing). A minimum sales price ranging from R$ 1.85 to R$ 2.83 per kg is required, according to the water management and the sowing date, for an internal return rate higher than 12%. Irrigation at 70% of TSWA provided a similar or better economic index and a higher yield than the rainfed system. It is an interesting water management option because water is used when the river water level is higher, ensuring yield stability and food production.

Suggested Citation

  • Justino, Ludmilla Ferreira & Alves Júnior, José & Battisti, Rafael & Heinemann, Alexandre Bryan & Leite, Caio Vinicius & Evangelista, Adão Wagner Pêgo & Casaroli, Derblai, 2019. "Assessment of economic returns by using a central pivot system to irrigate common beans during the rainfed season in Central Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 224(C), pages 1-1.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:224:y:2019:i:c:13
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419308637
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105749?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silva, Vicente de P.R. & Campos, João H.B.C. & Silva, Madson T. & Azevedo, Pedro V., 2010. "Impact of global warming on cowpea bean cultivation in northeastern Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(11), pages 1760-1768, November.
    2. Langarita, Raquel & Sánchez Chóliz, Julio & Sarasa, Cristina & Duarte, Rosa & Jiménez, Sofía, 2017. "Electricity costs in irrigated agriculture: A case study for an irrigation scheme in Spain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 1008-1019.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhao, Jiongchao & Wang, Chong & Shi, Xiaoyu & Bo, Xiaozhi & Li, Shuo & Shang, Mengfei & Chen, Fu & Chu, Qingquan, 2021. "Modeling climatically suitable areas for soybean and their shifts across China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Battisti, Rafael & Ferreira, Marcelo Dias Paes & Tavares, Érica Basílio & Knapp, Fábio Miguel & Bender, Fabiani Denise & Casaroli, Derblai & Alves Júnior, José, 2020. "Rules for grown soybean-maize cropping system in Midwestern Brazil: Food production and economic profits," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elshurafa, Amro M. & Alatawi, Hatem & Hasanov, Fakhri J. & Algahtani, Goblan J. & Felder, Frank A., 2022. "Cost, emission, and macroeconomic implications of diesel displacement in the Saudi agricultural sector: Options and policy insights," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    2. Langarita, Raquel & Duarte, Rosa & Hewings, Geoffrey & Sánchez-Chóliz, Julio, 2019. "Testing European goals for the Spanish electricity system using a disaggregated CGE model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1288-1301.
    3. Jennifer Burney & Daniele Cesano & Jarrod Russell & Emilio Rovere & Thais Corral & Nereide Coelho & Laise Santos, 2014. "Climate change adaptation strategies for smallholder farmers in the Brazilian Sertão," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 45-59, September.
    4. Patil, Sumeet & Kenia, Nandish & Gunatilake, Herath, 2021. "Divide and Prosper? Impacts of power-distribution feeder separation on household energy-use, irrigation, and crop production," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Duarte, Rosa & Langarita, Raquel & Sánchez-Chóliz, Julio, 2017. "The electricity industry in Spain: A structural analysis using a disaggregated input-output model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 2640-2651.
    6. Alonso Campos, J.C. & Jiménez-Bello, M.A. & Martínez Alzamora, F., 2020. "Real-time energy optimization of irrigation scheduling by parallel multi-objective genetic algorithms," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    7. Douak, M. & Aouachria, Z. & Rabehi, R. & Allam, N., 2018. "Wind energy systems: Analysis of the self-starting physics of vertical axis wind turbine," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1602-1610.
    8. Khaledi-Alamdari, Mohammad & Majnooni-Heris, Abolfazl & Fakheri-Fard, Ahmad & Russo, Ana, 2023. "Probabilistic climate risk assessment in rainfed wheat yield: Copula approach using water requirement satisfaction index," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:224:y:2019:i:c:13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.