IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v223y2019ic52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improved water management using subsurface membrane irrigation during cultivation of Phaseolus vulgaris

Author

Listed:
  • Lima, Valeria
  • Keitel, Claudia
  • Sutton, Bruce
  • Leslie, Gregory

Abstract

Subsurface membrane irrigation systems, controlled by changes in the water potential in the soil-plant-atmosphere continuum, were used to cultivate Phaseolus vulgaris over a full growth cycle (64 days). Membrane irrigation systems used a thin polyamide film supported on either a woven hydrophilic support (FO-TFC treatment) or a non-woven hydrophobic support (RO treatment). Water use efficiency was assessed using leaf biomass per unit irrigation water and compared to conventionally irrigated plants (control). Additionally, gas exchange and fluorescence parameters, as well as stable isotopes, were used to assess the plants’ physiological status. Soil water content over the growth cycle was maintained at 0.7 cm3 cm−3 under control conditions and declined from 0.6 to 0.12 cm3 cm−3 during plant growth, below residual moisture content, under both FO-TFC and RO membrane irrigation. Notwithstanding this, the total leaf dry matter was statistically equivalent for control plants (38.4 g) and FO-TFC treated plants (29.6 g) and approximately 68% lower for RO treated plants. The internal over external carbon concentration (Ci/Ca) in the leaves and efficiency of open Photosystem II reaction centres in the light (Fv'/Fm') were statistically equivalent in membrane treatments and control plants. Similarly, carbon (δ13C) and nitrogen (δ15N) isotope composition, as well as %N, of green bean pods and leaves were statistically equivalent for plants grown on FO-TFC and control, indicating no effect on beans protein content. Total bean production per parcel and plant water use efficiency (WUE) for conventional irrigation (0.24 kg at 10.2 kg m−3 WUE) was statistically equivalent to plants grown on FO-TFC treatment (0.19 kg at 12.8 kg m−3 WUE). Although the WUE for RO treatment (11.4 kg m−3) was statistically equivalent to control, the total bean production per parcel was significantly lower (0.07 kg). Results indicate that subsurface membrane irrigation may be a solution for improved water management without compromising yield production and quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Lima, Valeria & Keitel, Claudia & Sutton, Bruce & Leslie, Gregory, 2019. "Improved water management using subsurface membrane irrigation during cultivation of Phaseolus vulgaris," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 1-1.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:223:y:2019:i:c:52
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105730
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377419303403
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105730?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayars, J.E. & Fulton, A. & Taylor, B., 2015. "Subsurface drip irrigation in California—Here to stay?," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 39-47.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yasir L. Alrubaye & Badronnisa Yusuf & Thamer A. Mohammad & Haslinda Nahazanan & Mohamed Azwan Mohamed Zawawi, 2022. "Experimental and Numerical Prediction of Wetting Fronts Size Created by Sub-Surface Bubble Irrigation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giulio Sperandio & Mauro Pagano & Andrea Acampora & Vincenzo Civitarese & Carla Cedrola & Paolo Mattei & Roberto Tomasone, 2022. "Deficit Irrigation for Efficiency and Water Saving in Poplar Plantations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Williams, Larry E. & Levin, Alexander D. & Fidelibus, Matthew W., 2022. "Crop coefficients (Kc) developed from canopy shaded area in California vineyards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    3. Murley, Cameron B. & Sharma, Sumit & Warren, Jason G. & Arnall, Daryl B. & Raun, William R., 2018. "Yield response of corn and grain sorghum to row offsets on subsurface drip laterals," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 357-362.
    4. Ma, Xiaochi & Han, Feng & Wu, Jinggui & Ma, Yan & Jacoby, Pete W., 2023. "Optimizing crop water productivity and altering root distribution of Chardonnay grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) in a silt loam soil through direct root-zone deficit irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    5. Patrick Baur, 2020. "When farmers are pulled in too many directions: comparing institutional drivers of food safety and environmental sustainability in California agriculture," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(4), pages 1175-1194, December.
    6. Faisal I. Zeineldin & Yousef Al-Molhim, 2021. "Polymer and deficit irrigation influence on water use efficiency and yield of muskmelon under surface and subsurface drip irrigation," Soil and Water Research, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 16(3), pages 191-203.
    7. Ma, Xiaochi & Sanguinet, Karen A. & Jacoby, Pete W., 2020. "Direct root-zone irrigation outperforms surface drip irrigation for grape yield and crop water use efficiency while restricting root growth," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    8. Pisciotta, Antonino & Di Lorenzo, Rosario & Santalucia, Gioacchino & Barbagallo, Maria Gabriella, 2018. "Response of grapevine (Cabernet Sauvignon cv) to above ground and subsurface drip irrigation under arid conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 122-131.
    9. Leghari, Shah Jahan & Hu, Kelin & Wei, Yichang & Wang, Tongchao & Bhutto, Tofique Ahmed & Buriro, Mahmooda, 2021. "Modelling water consumption, N fates and maize yield under different water-saving management practices in China and Pakistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    10. Muhammad Umair & Tabassum Hussain & Hanbing Jiang & Ayesha Ahmad & Jiawei Yao & Yongqing Qi & Yucui Zhang & Leilei Min & Yanjun Shen, 2019. "Water-Saving Potential of Subsurface Drip Irrigation For Winter Wheat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Ma, Changjian & Li, Mengyao & Hou, Peng & Wang, Xuejun & Sun, Zeqiang & Li, Yan & Xiao, Yang & Li, Yunkai, 2024. "Biofilm dynamic changes in drip irrigation emitter flow channels using reclaimed water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    12. Al-Ghobari, Hussein M. & Dewidar, Ahmed Z., 2018. "Integrating deficit irrigation into surface and subsurface drip irrigation as a strategy to save water in arid regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 55-61.
    13. Rebecca Taylor & David Zilberman, 2017. "Diffusion of Drip Irrigation: The Case of California," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(1), pages 16-40.
    14. Qi, Wei & Zhang, Zhanyu & Wang, Ce & Huang, Mingyi, 2021. "Prediction of infiltration behaviors and evaluation of irrigation efficiency in clay loam soil under Moistube® irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    15. Ma, Xiaochi & Sanguinet, Karen A. & Jacoby, Pete W., 2019. "Performance of direct root-zone deficit irrigation on Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon production and water use efficiency in semi-arid southcentral Washington," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 47-57.
    16. Wang, Ce & Ye, Jinyang & Zhai, Yaming & Kurexi, Wuerkaixi & Xing, Dong & Feng, Genxiang & Zhang, Qun & Zhang, Zhanyu, 2023. "Dynamics of Moistube discharge, soil-water redistribution and wetting morphology in response to regulated working pressure heads," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    17. Eltarabily, Mohamed Galal & Mohamed, Abdelmoneim Zakaria & Begna, Sultan & Wang, Dong & Putnam, Daniel H. & Scudiero, Elia & Bali, Khaled M., 2024. "Simulated soil water distribution patterns and water use of Alfalfa under different subsurface drip irrigation depths," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    18. Robles, J.M. & Botía, P. & Pérez-Pérez, J.G, 2016. "Subsurface drip irrigation affects trunk diameter fluctuations in lemon trees, in comparison with surface drip irrigation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 11-21.
    19. Wang, Han & Xiang, Youzhen & Zhang, Fucang & Tang, Zijun & Guo, Jinjin & Zhang, Xueyan & Hou, Xianghao & Wang, Haidong & Cheng, Minghui & Li, Zhijun, 2022. "Responses of yield, quality and water-nitrogen use efficiency of greenhouse sweet pepper to different drip fertigation regimes in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    20. Muhammad Azher Bhatti & Sosheel Solomon Godfrey & Shai André Divon & Julie Therese Aamodt & Siv Øystese & Peter C. Wynn & Lars Olav Eik & Øivind Fjeld-Solberg, 2022. "Micro-Investment by Tanzanian Smallholders’ in Drip Irrigation Kits for Vegetable Production to Improve Livelihoods: Lessons Learned and a Way Forward," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-26, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:223:y:2019:i:c:52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.