IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v203y2018icp261-271.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grain sorghum production functions under different irrigation capacities

Author

Listed:
  • Araya, A.
  • Kisekka, I.
  • Gowda, P.H.
  • Prasad, P.V.V.

Abstract

Water is the major factor limiting crop production in semi-arid regions of the southern and central US High Plains. The Ogallala Aquifer is the major source of irrigation water in the region. The water levels in the aquifer have been declining due to water withdrawals for irrigation exceeding mean annual recharge. As a result, some of the wells in the region are not able to meet the crop water requirements due to lower irrigation capacity (IC). Grain sorghum, one of the major crops grown in western Kansas is considered drought tolerant. There is limited literature on the effect of IC on grain sorghum yield under erratic rainfall patterns of the semi-arid High Plains. Study objectives were to: (1) evaluate the Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer – Cropping System Model (DSSAT-CSM) for assessing grain sorghum yield and water productivity; (2) develop grain sorghum water production functions under five different IC, two cultivars and three irrigation scheduling strategies; and (3) evaluate response of grain sorghum under various IC in western Kansas based on long term historical weather; 4) to determine the minimum irrigation capacity required for irrigating grain sorghum in western Kansas. A calibrated and validated late maturing cultivar in prior study was used, while measured yield and phenology data of an early maturing cultivar was used to evaluate an existing cultivar in DSSAT model. Results showed that the cultivar in DSSAT were representative of the cultivars in the field with Normalized Root Mean Square of Error (NRMSE) 18%, index of agreement (I) of 0.97 and percent of deviation (d) −19 to 29%. The corresponding statistical goodness of fit values for days to flowering was 12%, 0.99 and 0–17%, respectively. Overall, the simulated yield and phenology values agreed with the measured indicating the satisfactory simulation performance of the model. Highest yield, crop water productivity and irrigation water use efficiencies were obtained from IC of 2.5–3.6 mm/day under the irrigation scheduling strategies from panicle initiation to grain filling. However, long term simulation showed that the minimum IC for growing grain sorghum varied depending on the minimum yield goal to be met based on long term perspective. In some wet years, lower IC up to 1.7 mm/day or even in some of the wettest years no irrigation was suitable. Our findings indicate that it might not be necessary to irrigate grain sorghum from planting to maturity but if producers are forced to do so by climatic conditions, an IC of 1.7–2.5 mm/day was found to produce a yield of at least 5 t/ha similar to that of 5 mm/day IC in 75% of the long-term growing seasons. If producers have to irrigate grain sorghum from panicle initiation to maturity, the 2.5 mm/day IC was found to be adequate to meet a minimum yield goal of 5 t/ha in 3 out of 4 years based on soils and long-term average climate around western Kansas. IC of 3.6 mm/day was found to be adequate if producers wish to irrigate only from panicle initiation to grain filling to meet a minimum yield goal of 6 t/ha in 75–90% of the long-term seasons.

Suggested Citation

  • Araya, A. & Kisekka, I. & Gowda, P.H. & Prasad, P.V.V., 2018. "Grain sorghum production functions under different irrigation capacities," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 261-271.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:203:y:2018:i:c:p:261-271
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.03.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377418301549
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2018.03.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, S. & Yang, J.Y. & Zhang, X.Y. & Drury, C.F. & Reynolds, W.D. & Hoogenboom, G., 2013. "Modelling crop yield, soil water content and soil temperature for a soybean–maize rotation under conventional and conservation tillage systems in Northeast China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 32-44.
    2. Araya, A. & Kisekka, Isaya & Gowda, Prasanna H. & Prasad, P.V. Vara, 2017. "Evaluation of water-limited cropping systems in a semi-arid climate using DSSAT-CSM," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 86-98.
    3. Tolk, Judy A. & Howell, Terry A., 2003. "Water use efficiencies of grain sorghum grown in three USA southern Great Plains soils," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 97-111, March.
    4. Lopez, Jose R. & Erickson, John E. & Asseng, Senthold & Bobeda, Edmundo Lopez, 2017. "Modification of the CERES grain sorghum model to simulate optimum sweet sorghum rooting depth for rainfed production on coarse textured soils in a sub-tropical environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 47-55.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xiang, Zaichen & Bailey, Ryan T. & Nozari, Soheil & Husain, Zainab & Kisekka, Isaya & Sharda, Vaishali & Gowda, Prasanna, 2020. "DSSAT-MODFLOW: A new modeling framework for exploring groundwater conservation strategies in irrigated areas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    2. Rouhi Rad, Mani & Haacker, Erin M.K. & Sharda, Vaishali & Nozari, Soheil & Xiang, Zaichen & Araya, A. & Uddameri, Venkatesh & Suter, Jordan F. & Gowda, Prasanna, 2020. "MOD$$AT: A hydro-economic modeling framework for aquifer management in irrigated agricultural regions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    3. Ezenne, G.I. & Jupp, Louise & Mantel, S.K. & Tanner, J.L., 2019. "Current and potential capabilities of UAS for crop water productivity in precision agriculture," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 158-164.
    4. Araya, A. & Gowda, P.H. & Golden, B. & Foster, A.J. & Aguilar, J. & Currie, R. & Ciampitti, I.A. & Prasad, P.V.V., 2019. "Economic value and water productivity of major irrigated crops in the Ogallala aquifer region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 55-63.
    5. Araya, A. & Prasad, P.V.V. & Gowda, P.H. & Sharda, V. & Rice, C.W. & Ciampitti, I.A., 2021. "Evaluating optimal irrigation strategies for maize in Western Kansas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    6. Araya, A. & Gowda, P.H. & Rad, M. Rouhi & Ariyaratne, C.B. & Ciampitti, I.A. & Rice, C.W. & Prasad, P.V.V., 2021. "Evaluating optimal irrigation for potential yield and economic performance of major crops in southwestern Kansas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    7. Rodrigo Rafael da Silva & José Francismar de Medeiros & Gabriela Carvalho Maia de Queiroz & Leonardo Vieira de Sousa & Maria Vanessa Pires de Souza & Milena de Almeida Bastos do Nascimento & Francimar, 2023. "Ionic Response and Sorghum Production under Water and Saline Stress in a Semi-Arid Environment," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Araya, A. & Gowda, P.H. & Golden, B. & Foster, A.J. & Aguilar, J. & Currie, R. & Ciampitti, I.A. & Prasad, P.V.V., 2019. "Economic value and water productivity of major irrigated crops in the Ogallala aquifer region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 55-63.
    2. Kothari, Kritika & Ale, Srinivasulu & Bordovsky, James P. & Thorp, Kelly R. & Porter, Dana O. & Munster, Clyde L., 2019. "Simulation of efficient irrigation management strategies for grain sorghum production over different climate variability classes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 49-62.
    3. Dutta, S. K & Laing, Alison M. & Kumar, S. & Gathala, Mahesh K. & Singh, Ajoy K. & Gaydon, D.S. & Poulton, P., 2020. "Improved water management practices improve cropping system profitability and smallholder farmers’ incomes," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    4. de Azevedo, Pedro Vieira & de Sousa, Inaja Francisco & da Silva, Bernardo Barbosa & da Silva, Vicente de Paulo Rodrigues, 2006. "Water-use efficiency of dwarf-green coconut (Cocos nucifera L.) orchards in northeast Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 84(3), pages 259-264, August.
    5. OKORIE, Benedict Odinaka & NIRAJ, Yadav, 2022. "Effects Of Different Tillage Practices On Soil Fertility Properties: A Review," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 8(1), February.
    6. Shuang Liu & Yuru Gao & Huilin Lang & Yong Liu & Hong Zhang, 2022. "Effects of Conventional Tillage and No-Tillage Systems on Maize ( Zea mays L.) Growth and Yield, Soil Structure, and Water in Loess Plateau of China: Field Experiment and Modeling Studies," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-14, October.
    7. Michaela ŠKEŘÍKOVÁ & Václav BRANT & Milan KROULÍK & Jan PIVEC & Petr ZÁBRANSKÝ & Josef HAKL & Michael HOFBAUER, 2018. "Water demands and biomass production of sorghum and maize plants in areas with insufficient precipitation in Central Europe," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 64(8), pages 367-378.
    8. Espoir Mukengere Bagula & Jackson-Gilbert Mwanjalolo Majaliwa & Twaha Ali Basamba & Jean-Gomez Mubalama Mondo & Bernard Vanlauwe & Geofrey Gabiri & John-Baptist Tumuhairwe & Gustave Nachigera Mushagal, 2022. "Water Use Efficiency of Maize ( Zea mays L.) Crop under Selected Soil and Water Conservation Practices along the Slope Gradient in Ruzizi Watershed, Eastern D.R. Congo," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    9. Pascual-Seva, N. & San Bautista, A. & López-Galarza, S. & Maroto, J.V. & Pascual, B., 2016. "Response of drip-irrigated chufa (Cyperus esculentus L. var. sativus Boeck.) to different planting configurations: Yield and irrigation water-use efficiency," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 140-147.
    10. Pascual-Seva, Núria & San Bautista, Alberto & López-Galarza, Salvador & Maroto, José Vicente & Pascual, Bernardo, 2018. "Influence of different drip irrigation strategies on irrigation water use efficiency on chufa (Cyperus esculentus L. var. sativus Boeck.) crop," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 406-413.
    11. Li, Xiumei & Zhao, Weixia & Li, Jiusheng & Li, Yanfeng, 2019. "Maximizing water productivity of winter wheat by managing zones of variable rate irrigation at different deficit levels," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 153-163.
    12. Yasarer, Lindsey M.W. & Sinnathamby, Sumathy & Sturm, Belinda S.M., 2016. "Impacts of biofuel-based land-use change on water quality and sustainability in a Kansas watershed," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 4-14.
    13. Araya, A. & Gowda, P.H. & Rad, M. Rouhi & Ariyaratne, C.B. & Ciampitti, I.A. & Rice, C.W. & Prasad, P.V.V., 2021. "Evaluating optimal irrigation for potential yield and economic performance of major crops in southwestern Kansas," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    14. Yang, J.M. & Yang, J.Y. & Liu, S. & Hoogenboom, G., 2014. "An evaluation of the statistical methods for testing the performance of crop models with observed data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 81-89.
    15. Yang, Xuan & Zheng, Lina & Yang, Qian & Wang, Zikui & Cui, Song & Shen, Yuying, 2018. "Modelling the effects of conservation tillage on crop water productivity, soil water dynamics and evapotranspiration of a maize-winter wheat-soybean rotation system on the Loess Plateau of China using," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 111-123.
    16. Della Nave, Facundo N. & Ojeda, Jonathan J. & Irisarri, J. Gonzalo N. & Pembleton, Keith & Oyarzabal, Mariano & Oesterheld, Martín, 2022. "Calibrating APSIM for forage sorghum using remote sensing and field data under sub-optimal growth conditions," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    17. Bai, Yu & Gao, Jinhua, 2021. "Optimization of the nitrogen fertilizer schedule of maize under drip irrigation in Jilin, China, based on DSSAT and GA," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    18. Mansouri-Far, Cyrus & Modarres Sanavy, Seyed Ali Mohammad & Saberali, Seyed Farhad, 2010. "Maize yield response to deficit irrigation during low-sensitive growth stages and nitrogen rate under semi-arid climatic conditions," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 12-22, January.
    19. Jha, P.K. & Araya, A. & Stewart, Z.P. & Faye, A. & Traore, H. & Middendorf, B.J. & Prasad, P.V.V., 2021. "Projecting potential impact of COVID-19 on major cereal crops in Senegal and Burkina Faso using crop simulation models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    20. Farre, Imma & Faci, Jose Maria, 2006. "Comparative response of maize (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean environment," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 83(1-2), pages 135-143, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:203:y:2018:i:c:p:261-271. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.