IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agiwat/v165y2016icp153-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of three remote sensing based models to estimate evapotranspiration in an oasis-desert region

Author

Listed:
  • Lian, Jinjiao
  • Huang, Mingbin

Abstract

Regional evapotranspiration (ET) estimation is crucial for regional water resources management and allocation. This paper evaluated the performance of three contextual remote sensing based models for ET estimation (METRIC—Mapping Evapotranspiration at High Resolution with Internalized Calibration; the Ts-VI triangle model; and SSEB-Simplified Surface Energy Balance) in an oasis-desert region during a growing season under advective environmental conditions. The performance of the three models was first assessed using surface fluxes observed at five eddy covariance (EC) flux towers installed in different land-cover types. Comparisons among model outputs were then conducted on a pixel-by-pixel basis for three main land-cover types (farmland, transition zone and desert). For METRIC and SSEB, good correlations were obtained between the modeled versus measured instantaneous latent heat flux (λET), with both R2 values above 0.90. Outliers occurred when available energy was overestimated for the Ts-VI triangle model. Pixel-wise comparisons showed the greatest consistency between the Ts-VI triangle model and METRIC outputs in farmland with an R2 of 0.98 and an RMSE of 13.69Wm−2. Overall, METRIC outperformed both the Ts-VI triangle and SSEB models; the Ts-VI triangle model tended to overestimate and the SSEB to underestimate at higher values of λET. ET estimations by SSEB and the Ts-VI triangle model are more sensitive to the estimated surface temperature and available energy than those from METRIC. Two daily ET extrapolation methods were evaluated with the EC measured daily ET . The results indicated that the constant reference ET fraction (ETrF) method could be used over well-watered areas due to the regional advection effect; the constant evaporative fraction (EF) method tended to give better outputs for other areas. Reasonable estimates of ET can be achieved by carefully selecting extreme pixels or edges, and validation is required when applying remote sensing based models, especially the contextual methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Lian, Jinjiao & Huang, Mingbin, 2016. "Comparison of three remote sensing based models to estimate evapotranspiration in an oasis-desert region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 153-162.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:165:y:2016:i:c:p:153-162
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2015.12.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377415301724
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.12.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Wenzhi & Liu, Bing & Zhang, Zhihui, 2010. "Water requirements of maize in the middle Heihe River basin, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 97(2), pages 215-223, February.
    2. Tasumi, Masahiro & Kimura, Reiji, 2013. "Estimation of volumetric soil water content over the Liudaogou river basin of the Loess Plateau using the SWEST method with spatial and temporal variability," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 22-28.
    3. Senay, G.B. & Budde, M.E. & Verdin, J.P., 2011. "Enhancing the Simplified Surface Energy Balance (SSEB) approach for estimating landscape ET: Validation with the METRIC model," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(4), pages 606-618, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dari, Jacopo & Quintana-Seguí, Pere & Morbidelli, Renato & Saltalippi, Carla & Flammini, Alessia & Giugliarelli, Elena & Escorihuela, María José & Stefan, Vivien & Brocca, Luca, 2022. "Irrigation estimates from space: Implementation of different approaches to model the evapotranspiration contribution within a soil-moisture-based inversion algorithm," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    2. Feng, Yu & Cui, Ningbo & Du, Taisheng & Gong, Daozhi & Hu, Xiaotao & Zhao, Lu, 2017. "Response of sap flux and evapotranspiration to deficit irrigation of greenhouse pear-jujube trees in semi-arid northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1-12.
    3. Mokhtari, Ali & Noory, Hamideh & Vazifedoust, Majid & Palouj, Mojtaba & Bakhtiari, Atousa & Barikani, Elham & Zabihi Afrooz, Ramezan Ali & Fereydooni, Fatemeh & Sadeghi Naeni, Ali & Pourshakouri, Farr, 2019. "Evaluation of single crop coefficient curves derived from Landsat satellite images for major crops in Iran," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 234-249.
    4. Xue, Jingyuan & Bali, Khaled M. & Light, Sarah & Hessels, Tim & Kisekka, Isaya, 2020. "Evaluation of remote sensing-based evapotranspiration models against surface renewal in almonds, tomatoes and maize," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Al Zayed, Islam Sabry & Elagib, Nadir Ahmed & Ribbe, Lars & Heinrich, Jürgen, 2016. "Satellite-based evapotranspiration over Gezira Irrigation Scheme, Sudan: A comparative study," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 66-76.
    2. Fan, Yaqiong & Ding, Risheng & Kang, Shaozhong & Hao, Xinmei & Du, Taisheng & Tong, Ling & Li, Sien, 2017. "Plastic mulch decreases available energy and evapotranspiration and improves yield and water use efficiency in an irrigated maize cropland," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 122-131.
    3. Yi, Jun & Li, Huijie & Zhao, Ying & Shao, Ming'an & Zhang, Hailin & Liu, Muxing, 2022. "Assessing soil water balance to optimize irrigation schedules of flood-irrigated maize fields with different cultivation histories in the arid region," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    4. Yamaç, Sevim Seda, 2021. "Artificial intelligence methods reliably predict crop evapotranspiration with different combinations of meteorological data for sugar beet in a semiarid area," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    5. Xue, Jingyuan & Fulton, Allan & Kisekka, Isaya, 2021. "Evaluating the role of remote sensing-based energy balance models in improving site-specific irrigation management for young walnut orchards," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    6. Li, Jiang & Mao, Xiaomin & Li, Mo, 2017. "Modeling hydrological processes in oasis of Heihe River Basin by landscape unit-based conceptual models integrated with FEFLOW and GIS," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 338-351.
    7. X. Wang & H. Wang & M. Hao & J. Li, 2015. "Effects of straw covering methods on runoff and soil erosion in summer maize field on the Loess Plateau of China," Plant, Soil and Environment, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 61(4), pages 176-181.
    8. Gao, Yukun & Zhao, Hongfang & Zhao, Chuang & Hu, Guohua & Zhang, Han & Liu, Xue & Li, Nan & Hou, Haiyan & Li, Xia, 2022. "Spatial and temporal variations of maize and wheat yield gaps and their relationships with climate in China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    9. Wang, Youzhi & Guo, Shanshan & Yue, Qing & Mao, Xiaomin & Guo, Ping, 2021. "Distributed AquaCrop simulation-nonlinear multi-objective dependent-chance programming for irrigation water resources management under uncertainty," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    10. Zhang, Chenglong & Guo, Ping, 2018. "FLFP: A fuzzy linear fractional programming approach with double-sided fuzziness for optimal irrigation water allocation," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 105-119.
    11. Qifeng Zhuang & Yintao Shi & Hua Shao & Gang Zhao & Dong Chen, 2021. "Evaluating the SSEBop and RSPMPT Models for Irrigated Fields Daily Evapotranspiration Mapping with MODIS and CMADS Data," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, May.
    12. Xiaoping Zhang & Xinyi Wang & Zihong Hu & Juncai Xu, 2023. "Landscape Pattern Changes and Climate Response in Nagqu Hangcuo National Wetland Park in the Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, June.
    13. Pir Mohammad & Ajanta Goswami, 2023. "Exploring different indicators for quantifying surface urban heat and cool island together: A case study over two metropolitan cities of India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 10857-10878, October.
    14. Liu Liu & Zezhong Guo & Guanhua Huang & Ruotong Wang, 2019. "Water Productivity Evaluation under Multi-GCM Projections of Climate Change in Oases of the Heihe River Basin, Northwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
    15. Lu, Zhixiang & Wei, Yongping & Xiao, Honglang & Zou, Songbing & Ren, Juan & Lyle, Clive, 2015. "Trade-offs between midstream agricultural production and downstream ecological sustainability in the Heihe River basin in the past half century," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 233-242.
    16. Zhou, Hong & Zhao, Wen zhi, 2019. "Modeling soil water balance and irrigation strategies in a flood-irrigated wheat-maize rotation system. A case in dry climate, China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 286-302.
    17. Chenglong Zhang & Qiong Yue & Ping Guo, 2019. "A Nonlinear Inexact Two-Stage Management Model for Agricultural Water Allocation under Uncertainty Based on the Heihe River Water Diversion Plan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Jiaqi Lu & Xifeng Zhang & Shuiming Liang & Xiaowei Cui, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Vegetation Index in an Oasis-Desert Transition Zone and Relationship with Environmental Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Xu, Xu & Jiang, Yao & Liu, Minghuan & Huang, Quanzhong & Huang, Guanhua, 2019. "Modeling and assessing agro-hydrological processes and irrigation water saving in the middle Heihe River basin," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 152-164.
    20. Tian, Xin & Dong, Jianzhi & Jin, Shuangyan & He, Hai & Yin, Hao & Chen, Xi, 2023. "Climate change impacts on regional agricultural irrigation water use in semi-arid environments," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agiwat:v:165:y:2016:i:c:p:153-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agwat .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.