IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v176y2019ics0308521x1831415x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction and measurement update of fungal toxin geospatial uncertainty using a Stacked Gaussian process

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelfatah, Kareem
  • Senn, Jonathan
  • Glaeser, Noemi
  • Terejanu, Gabriel

Abstract

The paper develops a stacked Gaussian process using both field and wet-lab measurements to predict fungal toxin (aflatoxin) concentrations in corn in South Carolina. While most of the aflatoxin contamination issues associated with the post-harvest period in the U.S. can be controlled with expensive testing, a systematic and economical approach is lacking to determine how the pre-harvest aflatoxin risk adversely affects crop producers as aflatoxin is virtually unobservable on a geographical and temporal scale. This information gap carries significant cost burdens for grain producers and it is filled by the proposed stacked Gaussian process. The novelty of the paper is twofold. First, the aflatoxin probabilistic maps are obtained using an analytical scheme to propagate the uncertainty through the stacked Gaussian process. The model predictions are validated both at the Gaussian process component level and at the system level for the entire stacked Gaussian process using historical field data. Second, a novel derivation is introduced to calculate the analytical covariance of aflatoxin production at two geographical locations. This is used to predict aflatoxin at unobserved locations using measurements at nearby locations but with the prior mean and covariance provided by the stacked Gaussian process. As field measurements arrive, this measurement update scheme may be used in targeted field inspections to warn farmers of emerging aflatoxin contaminations.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelfatah, Kareem & Senn, Jonathan & Glaeser, Noemi & Terejanu, Gabriel, 2019. "Prediction and measurement update of fungal toxin geospatial uncertainty using a Stacked Gaussian process," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:176:y:2019:i:c:s0308521x1831415x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X1831415X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102662?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Lin & Basso, Bruno, 2017. "Spatial evaluation of maize yield in Malawi," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 185-192.
    2. Outlaw, Joe & Waller, Mark & Richardson, James & Richburg, Nicholas & Russell, Levi & Welch, Mark & Falconer, Larry & Guidry, Kurt & Smith, Nathan, 2016. "Economics of Aflatoxin Risk Management in the Selected Southern States," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236001, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Singh, Kuntal & McClean, Colin J. & Büker, Patrick & Hartley, Sue E. & Hill, Jane K., 2017. "Mapping regional risks from climate change for rainfed rice cultivation in India," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 76-84.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhao, Jiongchao & Wang, Chong & Shi, Xiaoyu & Bo, Xiaozhi & Li, Shuo & Shang, Mengfei & Chen, Fu & Chu, Qingquan, 2021. "Modeling climatically suitable areas for soybean and their shifts across China," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Francisco Fontes & Ashley Gorst & Charles Palmer, 2021. "Threshold effects of extreme weather events on cereal yields in India," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 165(1), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Gallé, Johannes & Katzenberger, Anja, 2023. "Indian agriculture under climate change: The competing effect of temperature and rainfall anomalies," Ruhr Economic Papers 1002, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    4. Serey Sok & Nyda Chhinh & Sanara Hor & Pheakdey Nguonphan, 2021. "Climate Change Impacts on Rice Cultivation: A Comparative Study of the Tonle Sap and Mekong River," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Nitya Chanana-Nag & Pramod K. Aggarwal, 2020. "Woman in agriculture, and climate risks: hotspots for development," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 13-27, January.
    6. Sandeep Kandikuppa & Clark Gray, 2022. "Climate change and household debt in rural India," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 173(3), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Anders, Erin J. & Zulu, Leo C. & Jambo, Emmanuel R., 2020. "Limits to grain-legume technology integration by smallholder farmers: The case of time-sensitive labor demands and food security primacy in Malawi," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    8. Akpoti, Komlavi & Dossou-Yovo, Elliott R. & Zwart, Sander J. & Kiepe, Paul, 2021. "The potential for expansion of irrigated rice under alternate wetting and drying in Burkina Faso," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    9. Jayasree Krishnankutty & Michael Blakeney & Rajesh K. Raju & Kadambot H. M. Siddique, 2021. "Sustainability of Traditional Rice Cultivation in Kerala, India—A Socio-Economic Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    10. Mphande, Wiza & Kettlewell, Peter S. & Grove, Ivan G. & Farrell, Aidan D., 2020. "The potential of antitranspirants in drought management of arable crops: A review," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    11. Lin Liu & Bruno Basso, 2020. "Linking field survey with crop modeling to forecast maize yield in smallholder farmers’ fields in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(3), pages 537-548, June.
    12. Xu, Qin & Fox, Glenn & McKenney, Dan & Parkin, Gary, 2019. "A theoretical economic model of the demand for irrigation water," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:176:y:2019:i:c:s0308521x1831415x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.