IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v152y2017icp47-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Detecting spatial variability of paddy rice yield by combining the DNDC model with high resolution satellite images

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Quanying
  • Brocks, Sebastian
  • Lenz-Wiedemann, Victoria I.S.
  • Miao, Yuxin
  • Zhang, Fusuo
  • Bareth, Georg

Abstract

Yield estimation over large areas is critical for ensuring food security, guiding agronomical management, and designing national and international food trade strategies. Besides, analyzing the impacts of managed cropping systems on the environment is important for sustainable agriculture. In this study, the agro-ecosystem model DNDC (DeNitrification-DeComposition) and FORMOSAT-2 (FS-2) satellite imagery were used to detect spatial variabilities of paddy rice yield in the Qixing Farm in 2009. The Qixing Farm is located at the center of the Sanjiang Plain in north-east China, which is one of the important national food bases of China. The site-specific mode of the DNDC model was adapted due to its advantages of better transferability and flexibility. It was generalized onto a regional scale by programming a set of scripts using the Python programming language. Soil data were prepared as model inputs in 100m raster files. The spatial variabilities in modelled yields were well detected based on the detailed soil data and an accurate rice area map. Rice yield was also derived from multiple vegetation indices based on the FS-2 imagery. The DNDC model integrates environmental factors and predicts yield depending on all model input data, whereas the RS method mainly considers in-season crop information. Based on the vegetation indices, the RS-derived yield represents a response to the environmental factors and human activities which may exceed the DNDC capability. It was found that the highest coefficient of model determination (CD) and index of agreement (IA) for the modelled yield were 2.63 and 0.74, respectively, while for the RS-derived yield, the highest CD and IA were 1.2 and 0.55, respectively. Results from both methods were comparable and each method has its own advantages.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Quanying & Brocks, Sebastian & Lenz-Wiedemann, Victoria I.S. & Miao, Yuxin & Zhang, Fusuo & Bareth, Georg, 2017. "Detecting spatial variability of paddy rice yield by combining the DNDC model with high resolution satellite images," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 47-57.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:152:y:2017:i:c:p:47-57
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.11.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X16308125
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.11.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hansen, J. W. & Jones, J. W., 2000. "Scaling-up crop models for climate variability applications," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 43-72, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Finger, Robert, 2012. "Biases in Farm-Level Yield Risk Analysis due to Data Aggregation," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(01), pages 1-14, February.
    2. Mavromatis, T., 2016. "Spatial resolution effects on crop yield forecasts: An application to rainfed wheat yield in north Greece with CERES-Wheat," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 38-48.
    3. Podesta, Guillermo & Letson, David & Messina, Carlos & Royce, Fred & Ferreyra, R. Andres & Jones, James & Hansen, James & Llovet, Ignacio & Grondona, Martin & O'Brien, James J., 2002. "Use of ENSO-related climate information in agricultural decision making in Argentina: a pilot experience," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 371-392, December.
    4. Bezuidenhout, C.N. & Singels, A., 2007. "Operational forecasting of South African sugarcane production: Part 2 - System evaluation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-3), pages 39-51, January.
    5. James Watson & Andrew Challinor & Thomas Fricker & Christopher Ferro, 2015. "Comparing the effects of calibration and climate errors on a statistical crop model and a process-based crop model," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 93-109, September.
    6. Quiroga, Sonia & Iglesias, Ana, 2009. "A comparison of the climate risks of cereal, citrus, grapevine and olive production in Spain," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 101(1-2), pages 91-100, June.
    7. Bezuidenhout, C.N. & Singels, A., 2007. "Operational forecasting of South African sugarcane production: Part 1 - System description," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 92(1-3), pages 23-38, January.
    8. Kar, Gouranga & Verma, H.N., 2005. "Climatic water balance, probable rainfall, rice crop water requirements and cold periods in AER 12.0 in India," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 15-32, March.
    9. Schlindwein, Sandro L. & Eulenstein, Frank & Lana, Marcos & Sieber, Stefan & Boulanger, Jean-Philippe & Guevara, Edgardo & Meira, Santiago & Gentile, Elvira & Bonatti, Michelle, 2015. "What Can Be Learned about the Adaptation Process of Farming Systems to Climate Dynamics Using Crop Models?," Sustainable Agriculture Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(4).
    10. Balkovič, Juraj & van der Velde, Marijn & Schmid, Erwin & Skalský, Rastislav & Khabarov, Nikolay & Obersteiner, Michael & Stürmer, Bernhard & Xiong, Wei, 2013. "Pan-European crop modelling with EPIC: Implementation, up-scaling and regional crop yield validation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 61-75.
    11. Adam, M. & Van Bussel, L.G.J. & Leffelaar, P.A. & Van Keulen, H. & Ewert, F., 2011. "Effects of modelling detail on simulated potential crop yields under a wide range of climatic conditions," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 131-143.
    12. van Ittersum, Martin K. & Ewert, Frank & Heckelei, Thomas & Wery, Jacques & Alkan Olsson, Johanna & Andersen, Erling & Bezlepkina, Irina & Brouwer, Floor & Donatelli, Marcello & Flichman, Guillermo & , 2008. "Integrated assessment of agricultural systems - A component-based framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS)," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 96(1-3), pages 150-165, March.
    13. Anubhab Pattanayak & K. S. Kavi Kumar, "undated". "Does Weather Sensitivity of Rice Yield Vary Across Regions? Evidence from Eastern and Southern India," Working Papers 2017-162, Madras School of Economics,Chennai,India.
    14. Hardaker, J. Brian & Lien, Gudbrand, 2010. "Probabilities for decision analysis in agriculture and rural resource economics: The need for a paradigm change," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(6), pages 345-350, July.
    15. Xiong, Wei & Holman, Ian & Conway, Declan & Lin, Erda & Li, Yue, 2008. "A crop model cross calibration for use in regional climate impacts studies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 213(3), pages 365-380.
    16. Heinemann, A. B. & Hoogenboom, G. & de Faria, R. T., 2002. "Determination of spatial water requirements at county and regional levels using crop models and GIS: An example for the State of Parana, Brazil," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(3), pages 177-196, January.
    17. Abdul Rehman & Luan Jingdong, 2017. "An econometric analysis of major Chinese food crops: An empirical study," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1323372-132, January.
    18. Louise Beveridge & Stephen Whitfield & Andy Challinor, 2018. "Crop modelling: towards locally relevant and climate-informed adaptation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 475-489, April.
    19. Piewthongngam, Kullapapruk & Pathumnakul, Supachai & Setthanan, Kanchana, 2009. "Application of crop growth simulation and mathematical modeling to supply chain management in the Thai sugar industry," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 102(1-3), pages 58-66, October.
    20. Everingham, Y. L. & Muchow, R. C. & Stone, R. C. & Inman-Bamber, N. G. & Singels, A. & Bezuidenhout, C. N., 2002. "Enhanced risk management and decision-making capability across the sugarcane industry value chain based on seasonal climate forecasts," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 459-477, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:152:y:2017:i:c:p:47-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.