IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/agisys/v148y2016icp124-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Description and validation of the Teagasc Lamb Production Model

Author

Listed:
  • Bohan, A.
  • Shalloo, L.
  • Malcolm, B.
  • Ho, C.K.M.
  • Creighton, P.
  • Boland, T.M.
  • McHugh, N.

Abstract

A stochastic budgetary simulation model of a sheep farm was developed to investigate the effects of changes in lamb production systems on farm profitability. Model inputs included: land, labour, capital, animal numbers, as well as, input and output prices. Model outputs were simulated on a monthly basis and included: flock sales and purchases, net energy demand, grass supply and demand, lamb growth and slaughtering pattern, as well as, land and labour utilization. Grass growth, ewe and lamb mortality, fertiliser and concentrate price along with lamb and mutton price were all included in the model as stochastic variables. Farm earnings before interest and tax and net profit, both including and excluding owner/operator labour, were calculated from total receipts from lamb, culled animals and wool less variable and fixed costs. Validation of the model was undertaken by comparing the model outputs to real farm data recorded on 20 Irish commercial sheep farms as well as comparing the model outputs to those of three individual Irish commercial sheep farms. The model outputs were similar to the real farm data indicating that the model provides a realistic representation of actual farm performance, output and profit. To demonstrate potential application of the model, two lambing date scenarios were investigated; a mid-season lambing flock, with a mean lambing date of March 1st and an early lambing flock, with a mean lambing date of January 1st. Both lambing date scenarios had the same farm area, overall herbage utilization, pregnancy scanning rate and number of lambs weaned per ewe joined to the ram, but the early lambing flock had a higher stocking rate (13.23ewes/ha versus 9.46ewes/ha for March 1st lambing) which increased due to the higher proportion of concentrate in the total flock diet compared with March 1st lambing. The annual return on investment (ROI) of the mid-season lambing flock was 0.95% with a net profit of €11,045 excluding owner/operator labour and management. The early lambing system produced a ROI of −0.70% and a net profit of −€4862. When owner/operator labour and management cost were included the ROI was −0.38% with net profits of −€5462 for March 1st lambing and a ROI of −2.46% and net profits of −€26,735 for January 1st lambing.

Suggested Citation

  • Bohan, A. & Shalloo, L. & Malcolm, B. & Ho, C.K.M. & Creighton, P. & Boland, T.M. & McHugh, N., 2016. "Description and validation of the Teagasc Lamb Production Model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 124-134.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:148:y:2016:i:c:p:124-134
    DOI: 10.1016/j.agsy.2016.07.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X16303481
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.agsy.2016.07.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edelsten, P. R. & Newton, J. E., 1977. "A simulation model of a lowland sheep system," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 17-32, January.
    2. S. S. Isukapalli & A. Roy & P. G. Georgopoulos, 1998. "Stochastic Response Surface Methods (SRSMs) for Uncertainty Propagation: Application to Environmental and Biological Systems," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 351-363, June.
    3. Qureshi, M. E. & Harrison, S. R. & Wegener, M. K., 1999. "Validation of multicriteria analysis models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 62(2), pages 105-116, November.
    4. McCarl, Bruce A. & Apland, Jeffrey, 1986. "Validation Of Linear Programming Models," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-10, December.
    5. Janssen, Sander & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2007. "Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 622-636, June.
    6. Tocker, Jonathon & Malcolm, Bill & Heard, J. & Sinnett, A. & Ho, C. & Behrendt, R., 2013. "Profit, cash, wealth and risk implications of changes to a prime lamb business in south-west Victoria," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 10, pages 1-27.
    7. Gutierrez-Aleman, Nestor & De Boer, A. J. & Hart, R. D., 1986. "A bio-economic model of small-ruminant production in the semi-arid tropics of the Northeast Region of Brazil: Part 1--Model description and components," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 55-66.
    8. Jackson, Thomas & Heard, J. & Malcolm, Bill, 2014. "System changes to a lamb farm in south-west Victoria: some pre-experimental modelling," AFBM Journal, Australasian Farm Business Management Network, vol. 11, pages 1-18.
    9. Cacho, O. J. & Finlayson, J. D. & Bywater, A. C., 1995. "A simulation model of grazing sheep: II. Whole farm model," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 27-50.
    10. Crosson, P. & O'Kiely, P. & O'Mara, F.P. & Wallace, M., 2006. "The development of a mathematical model to investigate Irish beef production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 89(2-3), pages 349-370, September.
    11. Cros, M. J. & Duru, M. & Garcia, F. & Martin-Clouaire, R., 2004. "Simulating management strategies: the rotational grazing example," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 23-42, April.
    12. Duncan Knowler, 2002. "A Review of Selected Bioeconomic Models with Environmental Influences in Fisheries," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 163-181, May.
    13. Finlayson, J. D. & Cacho, O. J. & Bywater, A. C., 1995. "A simulation model of grazing sheep: I. Animal growth and intake," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 1-25.
    14. White, D. H. & Bowman, P. J. & Morley, F. H. W. & McManus, W. R. & Filan, S. J., 1983. "A simulation model of a breeding ewe flock," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 149-189, March.
    15. Gutierrez-Aleman, Nestor & De Boer, A. J. & Kehrberg, E. W., 1986. "A bio-economic model of small-ruminant production in the semi-arid tropics of the Northeast region of Brazil: Part 2--Linear programming applications and results," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 159-187.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Villalba, D. & Díez-Unquera, B. & Carrascal, A. & Bernués, A. & Ruiz, R., 2019. "Multi-objective simulation and optimisation of dairy sheep farms: Exploring trade-offs between economic and environmental outcomes," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 107-118.
    2. Kamilaris, C. & Dewhurst, R.J. & Vosough Ahmadi, B. & Crosson, P. & Alexander, P., 2020. "A bio-economic model for cost analysis of alternative management strategies in beef finishing systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Tsakiridis, Andreas & O’Donoghue, Cathal & Hynes, Stephen & Kilcline, Kevin, 2020. "A Comparison of Environmental and Economic Sustainability across Seafood and Livestock Product Value Chains," Working Papers 309507, National University of Ireland, Galway, Socio-Economic Marine Research Unit.
    4. Farrell, L.J. & Kenyon, P.R. & Tozer, P.R. & Ramilan, T. & Cranston, L.M., 2020. "Quantifying sheep enterprise profitability with varying flock replacement rates, lambing rates, and breeding strategies in New Zealand," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    5. Farrell, L. & Herron, J. & Pabiou, T. & McHugh, N. & McDermott, K. & Shalloo, L. & O'Brien, D. & Bohan, A., 2022. "Modelling the production, profit, and greenhouse gas emissions of Irish sheep flocks divergent in genetic merit," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Le Gal, P.-Y. & Dugué, P. & Faure, G. & Novak, S., 2011. "How does research address the design of innovative agricultural production systems at the farm level? A review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(9), pages 714-728.
    2. Veysset, P. & Lherm, M. & Bébin, D., 2010. "Energy consumption, greenhouse gas emissions and economic performance assessments in French Charolais suckler cattle farms: Model-based analysis and forecasts," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 41-50, January.
    3. Janssen, Sander & van Ittersum, Martin K., 2007. "Assessing farm innovations and responses to policies: A review of bio-economic farm models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 622-636, June.
    4. Soraya Tanure & Carlos Nabinger & João Luiz Becker, 2015. "Bioeconomic Model of Decision Support System for Farm Management: Proposal of a Mathematical Model," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(6), pages 658-671, November.
    5. Vanwindekens, Frédéric M. & Stilmant, Didier & Baret, Philippe V., 2013. "Development of a broadened cognitive mapping approach for analysing systems of practices in social–ecological systems," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 352-362.
    6. Finlayson, J. D. & Cacho, O. J. & Bywater, A. C., 1995. "A simulation model of grazing sheep: I. Animal growth and intake," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 1-25.
    7. Nedumaran, S., 2013. "Tradeoff between Non-farm Income and on-farm conservation investments in the Semi-Arid Tropics of India," 2013 Conference (57th), February 5-8, 2013, Sydney, Australia 152171, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    8. Schreinemachers, Pepijn & Berger, Thomas & Aune, Jens B., 2007. "Simulating soil fertility and poverty dynamics in Uganda: A bio-economic multi-agent systems approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 387-401, December.
    9. Gicheha, M.G. & Edwards, G.R. & Bell, S.T. & Burtt, E.S. & Bywater, A.C., 2014. "Embedded risk management in dryland sheep systems II. Risk analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-11.
    10. Luz Maria Castro & Fabian Härtl & Santiago Ochoa & Baltazar Calvas & Leonardo Izquierdo & Thomas Knoke, 2018. "Integrated bio-economic models as tools to support land-use decision making: a review of potential and limitations," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 183-211, July.
    11. Tzemi, Domna & Breen, James, 2019. "Reducing greenhouse gas emissions through the use of urease inhibitors: A farm level analysis," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 394(C), pages 18-26.
    12. Schönhart, Martin & Schauppenlehner, Thomas & Schmid, Erwin & Muhar, Andreas, 2011. "Integration of bio-physical and economic models to analyze management intensity and landscape structure effects at farm and landscape level," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 122-134, February.
    13. Gicheha, M.G. & Edwards, G.R. & Bell, S.T. & Bywater, A.C., 2014. "Embedded risk management in dryland sheep systems I. Field results and development of a destocking algorithm," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 12-20.
    14. Pepijn Schreinemachers & Thomas Berger & Aer Sirijinda & Suwanna Praneetvatakul, 2009. "The Diffusion of Greenhouse Agriculture in Northern Thailand: Combining Econometrics and Agent‐Based Modeling," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 57(4), pages 513-536, December.
    15. Cacho, O. J. & Bywater, A. C. & Dillon, J. L., 1999. "Assessment of production risk in grazing models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 87-98, May.
    16. Ashfield, A. & Crosson, P. & Wallace, M., 2013. "Simulation modelling of temperate grassland based dairy calf to beef production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 41-50.
    17. S. Nedumaran & Beleke Shiferaw & M. Bantilan & K. Palanisami & Suhas Wani, 2014. "Bioeconomic modeling of farm household decisions for ex-ante impact assessment of integrated watershed development programs in semi-arid India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 257-286, April.
    18. Kamilaris, C. & Dewhurst, R.J. & Vosough Ahmadi, B. & Crosson, P. & Alexander, P., 2020. "A bio-economic model for cost analysis of alternative management strategies in beef finishing systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    19. Girard, N. & Hubert, B., 1999. "Modelling expert knowledge with knowledge-based systems to design decision aids : The example of a knowledge-based model on grazing management," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 123-144, February.
    20. Bilotto, Franco & Recavarren, Paulo & Vibart, Ronaldo & Machado, Claudio F., 2019. "Backgrounding strategy effects on farm productivity, profitability and greenhouse gas emissions of cow-calf systems in the Flooding Pampas of Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:agisys:v:148:y:2016:i:c:p:124-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/agsy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.