IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ecr/col070/10767.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Expert opinion as an instrument for assessing investment in primary education

Author

Listed:
  • Wolff, Laurence
  • Schiefelbein, Ernesto
  • Schiefelbein, Paulina

Abstract

Most educational investment is based on untested or partially tested assumptions about the cost-effectiveness of a given course of action. Indeed, the only estimates that have been available have been for the average profitability of each type of education, even though these differ greatly from marginal profitability. This article sets out a new approach to estimating the cost-effectiveness of educational investment. The authors canvassed the views of ten world-renowned educational researchers on the likely impact on students' learning achievements of a set of forty measures generally regarded as desirable for improving primary education, and supplemented the responses received with their own calculations of the cost of each, the aim being to establish an index of cost-effectiveness. On this basis, they concluded that the educational projects implemented in the region have failed to include many of the measures identified as the most efficient, and this has limited the quality of the education provided and its potential contribution to economic success, despite the considerable increase in educational investment by governments and international bodies in the 1990s. The article concludes with a number of recommendations aimed at remedying this situation, which take account simultaneously of the impact and the cost of the different educational measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolff, Laurence & Schiefelbein, Ernesto & Schiefelbein, Paulina, 2000. "Expert opinion as an instrument for assessing investment in primary education," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecr:col070:10767
    Note: Includes bibliography
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/10767
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wolff, L. & Schiefelbein, E. & Valenzuela, J., 1994. "Improving the Quality of Primary Education in Latin America and the Caribbean," World Bank - Discussion Papers 257, World Bank.
    2. Verspoor, A., 1989. "Pathways To Change - Improving The Quality Of Education In Developing Countries," World Bank - Discussion Papers 53, World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Baine, 1993. "Educational Innovation in Developing Countries: Problems and Procedures," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 5(1), pages 15-29, March.
    2. Teas, Molly Maguire, 1993. "Increasing women's participation in the primary school teaching force and teacher training in Nepal," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1161, The World Bank.
    3. Joan B. Anderson, 2000. "Factors affecting learning of Mexican primary school children," Estudios Económicos, El Colegio de México, Centro de Estudios Económicos, vol. 15(1), pages 117-152.
    4. Harriet Nannyonjo, 2007. "Education Inputs In Uganda : An Analysis of Factors Influencing Learning Achievement in Grade Six," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6758.
    5. AOK Noah, 2012. "A Political Economy of the African School as a Learning Organization," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(2), pages 152-160, April.
    6. AOK Noah, 2013. "A Political Economy of the African School as a Learning Organization," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(3), pages 93-100, June.
    7. Verspoor, Adriaan, 1991. "Lending for learning : twenty years of World Bank support for basic education," Policy Research Working Paper Series 686, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecr:col070:10767. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Biblioteca CEPAL (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eclaccl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.