IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ3/2017-01-26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit Committee Activities and the Internal Control System of Commercial Banks Operating in Yemen

Author

Listed:
  • Yahya Ali Al-Matari

    (School of Economics, Finance and Banking, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia,)

  • Sulaiman Abdullah Saif Mohammed

    (School of Economics, Finance and Banking, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia,)

  • Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari

    (Tunku Intan Safinaz School of Accountancy, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia, Amran University, Yemen.)

Abstract

This study primarily aims to investigate the impact of audit committee (AC) effectiveness on the internal control system of commercial banks through the use of four of its characteristics namely AC meetings, meeting frequency between AC and internal auditors (IAs), AC reviews and internal audit proposals and lastly, AC reviews of the internal audit results. The study results were obtained by using data gathered from the Yemeni commercial banks through the questionnaire survey method. A total of 88 usable questionnaires out of 170 questionnaires distributed to 17 commercial banks were considered suitable for analysis. The results showed that the AC effectiveness, represented by meetings frequency between AC and IAs, AC reviews of the internal audit proposals, and audit reviews of the internal audit significantly related to the commercial banks performance. Literature regarding AC characteristics that are relevant to the present study was reviewed, and practical implications as well as recommendations for future studies were provided towards the end of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Yahya Ali Al-Matari & Sulaiman Abdullah Saif Mohammed & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari, 2017. "Audit Committee Activities and the Internal Control System of Commercial Banks Operating in Yemen," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(1), pages 191-196.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2017-01-26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/download/2899/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.econjournals.com/index.php/irmm/article/view/2899/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, Ronald C. & Mansi, Sattar A. & Reeb, David M., 2004. "Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 315-342, September.
    2. Alzeban, Abdulaziz & Gwilliam, David, 2014. "Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: A survey of the Saudi public sector," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 74-86.
    3. Barua, Abhijit & Rama, Dasaratha V & Sharma, Vineeta, 2010. "Audit committee characteristics and investment in internal auditing," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 503-513, September.
    4. Marco Allegrini & Giulio Greco, 2013. "Corporate boards, audit committees and voluntary disclosure: evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 17(1), pages 187-216, February.
    5. H.A.E. Afify, 2009. "Determinants of audit report lag," Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 56-86, May.
    6. Agrawal, Anup & Chadha, Sahiba, 2005. "Corporate Governance and Accounting Scandals," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 48(2), pages 371-406, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hani Shaiti & Yahya Al-Matari, 2020. "Internal Audit Function Characteristics and the Quality of Internal Control Systems: Moderating the Effect of Enterprise Resource Planning System Maturity," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(9), pages 1012-1027, September.
    2. Philna Coetzee & Lourens J. Erasmus, 2020. "Driving Audit Committee Disclosure: Legislation Versus Best Practice," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(1), pages 36-50, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ines Maraghni & Mehdi Nekhili & Tawhid Chtioui, 2016. "Caractéristiques du comité d'audit et étendue du reporting sur le contrôle interne : cas des entreprises françaises," Post-Print hal-01901185, HAL.
    2. Redhwan Al‐Dhamari & Abdulsalam Saad Alquhaif & Bakr Ali Al‐Gamrh, 2022. "Modelling the impact of audit/remuneration committee overlap on debtholders' perceptions of accounting information quality: The role of CEO power," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(3), pages 2898-2920, July.
    3. Alzeban, Abdulaziz & Sawan, Nedal, 2015. "The impact of audit committee characteristics on the implementation of internal audit recommendations," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 61-71.
    4. Jimi Siekkinen, 2017. "Board characteristics and the value relevance of fair values," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(2), pages 435-471, June.
    5. George Drogalas & Michail Nerantzidis & Dimitrios Mitskinis & Ioannis Tampakoudis, 2021. "The relationship between audit fees and audit committee characteristics: evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(1), pages 24-41, March.
    6. Sugato Chakravarty & Chiraphol N. Chiyachantana & Christine Jiang, 2011. "THE CHOICE OF TRADING VENUE AND RELATIVE PRICE IMPACT OF INSTITUTIONAL TRADING: ADRs VERSUS THE UNDERLYING SECURITIES IN THEIR LOCAL MARKETS," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 34(4), pages 537-567, December.
    7. Duellman, Scott & Hurwitz, Helen & Sun, Yan, 2015. "Managerial overconfidence and audit fees," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(2), pages 148-165.
    8. Yahya Ali Al-Matari & Abdullah Kaid Al-Swidi & Faudziah Hanim Bt Fadzil & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari, 2012. "Board of Directors, Audit Committee Characteristics and Performance of Saudi Arabia Listed Companies," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 2(4), pages 241-251.
    9. Simona Alfiero & Massimo Cane & Ruggiero Doronzo & Alfredo Esposito, 2018. "Determining characteristics of boards adopting Integrated Reporting," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(2), pages 37-71.
    10. Hidaya Lawati & Khaled Hussainey & Roza Sagitova, 2021. "Disclosure quality vis-à-vis disclosure quantity: Does audit committee matter in Omani financial institutions?," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 57(2), pages 557-594, August.
    11. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, April.
    12. Mahfuja Malik, 2014. "Audit committee composition and effectiveness: a review of post-SOX literature," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 81-117, October.
    13. Amad Rashid & Basariah Salim & Halimah Nasibah Ahmad, 2021. "Internal Audit Effectiveness and Audit Committee Characteristics:Empirical Evidence from Pakistan," iRASD Journal of Management, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 3(1), pages 1-13, june.
    14. repec:csr:wpaper:1014 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Rustam, Sehrish & Rashid, Kashif & Zaman, Khalid, 2013. "The relationship between audit committees, compensation incentives and corporate audit fees in Pakistan," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 697-716.
    16. Krayyem Al-Hajaya, 2019. "The Impact of Audit Committee Effectiveness on Audit Quality: Evidence from the Middle East," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 9(5), pages 1-8.
    17. Attiya Y. Javed & Robina Iqbal, 2007. "The Relationship between Corporate Governance Indicators and Firm Value: A Case Study of Karachi Stock Exchange," PIDE-Working Papers 2007:14, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    18. Hazar Ben Barka & François Legendre, 2017. "Effect of the board of directors and the audit committee on firm performance: a panel data analysis," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 21(3), pages 737-755, September.
    19. Armstrong, Christopher S. & Guay, Wayne R. & Weber, Joseph P., 2010. "The role of information and financial reporting in corporate governance and debt contracting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2-3), pages 179-234, December.
    20. Saddam A. Hazaea & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari & Adam Mohamed Omer & Najib H. S. Farhan & Jinyu Zhu, 2024. "The impact of internal audit system on performance: evidence from emerging markets," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    21. Ashfaque Banbhan & Xinsheng Cheng & Nizam Ud Din, 2018. "Financially Qualified Members in an Upper Echelon and Their Relationship with Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Corporate Governance; Ýnternal Audit; Audit Committee; Ýnternal Control System; Yemen;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G34 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Mergers; Acquisitions; Restructuring; Corporate Governance
    • M4 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ3:2017-01-26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.