IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2023-06-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analytic Hierarchy Process Based Approach for Evaluating Feasibility of Offshore Wind Farm on the Colombian Caribbean Coast

Author

Listed:
  • Adalberto Ospino-Castro

    (Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla, Colombia,)

  • Carlos Robles-Algarín

    (Universidad del Magdalena, Santa Marta, Colombia.)

  • Amanda Mangones-Cordero

    (Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla, Colombia,)

  • Sharys Romero-Navas

    (Universidad de la Costa, Barranquilla, Colombia,)

Abstract

Planning a wind power generation project is intricate, considering the number of variables to be careful in the acceptable zone selection for its siting. One of the difficulties of developing a wind farm is finding the most satisfactory location to build it; this can take years of feasibility studies. The main objective of this research is to use the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritize a group of criteria and sub-criteria as decision-making support for the selection of suitable areas in which implementing wind energy projects in the Colombian Caribbean Sea. The criteria to be applied in this study were selected based on the most recurrently employed criteria in other research papers and the experience of the authors. Thus, a hierarchical structure with 4 criteria (technical, environmental, social, and economic) and 14 subcriteria was implemented. All criteria were prioritized using the methodology proposed by AHP, for which 10 experts with experience in offshore wind projects were consulted, through a form designed with a matrix structure. The results allowed prioritizing a set of criteria necessary for offshore energy planning projects, in which the criteria of Protected Area (19.62%), Wind Speed (13.84%) and Military Areas (9.79%) were the most relevant.

Suggested Citation

  • Adalberto Ospino-Castro & Carlos Robles-Algarín & Amanda Mangones-Cordero & Sharys Romero-Navas, 2023. "An Analytic Hierarchy Process Based Approach for Evaluating Feasibility of Offshore Wind Farm on the Colombian Caribbean Coast," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 64-73, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2023-06-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/14621/7544
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/14621
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Costoya, X. & deCastro, M. & Santos, F. & Sousa, M.C. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2019. "Projections of wind energy resources in the Caribbean for the 21st century," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 356-367.
    2. Bahaj, AbuBakr S. & Mahdy, Mostafa & Alghamdi, Abdulsalam S. & Richards, David J., 2020. "New approach to determine the Importance Index for developing offshore wind energy potential sites: Supported by UK and Arabian Peninsula case studies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 441-457.
    3. Breton, Simon-Philippe & Moe, Geir, 2009. "Status, plans and technologies for offshore wind turbines in Europe and North America," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 646-654.
    4. Astiaso Garcia, Davide & Canavero, Giulia & Ardenghi, Francesco & Zambon, Martina, 2015. "Analysis of wind farm effects on the surrounding environment: Assessing population trends of breeding passerines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 190-196.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pandora Gkeka-Serpetsidaki & Georgia Skiniti & Stavroula Tournaki & Theocharis Tsoutsos, 2024. "A Review of the Sustainable Siting of Offshore Wind Farms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-29, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdelaziz, Sara & Sparrow, Sarah N. & Hua, Weiqi & Wallom, David C.H., 2024. "Assessing long-term future climate change impacts on extreme low wind events for offshore wind turbines in the UK exclusive economic zone," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 354(PB).
    2. Ghosh, Prasenjit & Rong, Jian & Khanna, Madhu & Wang, Weiwei & Miao, Ruiqing, 2017. "Have They Gone with the Wind? Indirect Effects of Wind Turbines on Bird Abundance," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258100, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Mostafaeipour, Ali, 2010. "Productivity and development issues of global wind turbine industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 1048-1058, April.
    4. Rippel, Daniel & Peng, Shengrui & Lütjen, Michael & Sczcerbicka, Helena & Freitag, Michael, 2020. "Model transformation framework for scheduling offshore logistics," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Data Science in Maritime and City Logistics: Data-driven Solutions for Logistics and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conferen, volume 30, pages 521-552, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    5. Hand, Brian & Kelly, Ger & Cashman, Andrew, 2021. "Aerodynamic design and performance parameters of a lift-type vertical axis wind turbine: A comprehensive review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    6. Sun, Xiaojing & Huang, Diangui & Wu, Guoqing, 2012. "The current state of offshore wind energy technology development," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 298-312.
    7. Kuang, Limin & Katsuchi, Hiroshi & Zhou, Dai & Chen, Yaoran & Han, Zhaolong & Zhang, Kai & Wang, Jiaqi & Bao, Yan & Cao, Yong & Liu, Yijie, 2023. "Strategy for mitigating wake interference between offshore vertical-axis wind turbines: Evaluation of vertically staggered arrangement," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    8. Karimirad, Madjid & Michailides, Constantine, 2015. "V-shaped semisubmersible offshore wind turbine: An alternative concept for offshore wind technology," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 126-143.
    9. Dhunny, A.Z. & Timmons, D.S. & Allam, Z. & Lollchund, M.R. & Cunden, T.S.M., 2020. "An economic assessment of near-shore wind farm development using a weather research forecast-based genetic algorithm model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    10. Zhang, Shuangyi & Li, Xichen, 2021. "Future projections of offshore wind energy resources in China using CMIP6 simulations and a deep learning-based downscaling method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    11. Lei, Hang & Su, Jie & Bao, Yan & Chen, Yaoran & Han, Zhaolong & Zhou, Dai, 2019. "Investigation of wake characteristics for the offshore floating vertical axis wind turbines in pitch and surge motions of platforms," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 471-489.
    12. Campbell, Maria S. & Stehfest, Kilian M. & Votier, Stephen C. & Hall-Spencer, Jason M., 2014. "Mapping fisheries for marine spatial planning: Gear-specific vessel monitoring system (VMS), marine conservation and offshore renewable energy," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 293-300.
    13. Kaldellis, John K. & Zafirakis, D., 2011. "The wind energy (r)evolution: A short review of a long history," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 1887-1901.
    14. Deng, Sijia & Liu, Yingyi & Ning, Dezhi, 2023. "Fully coupled aero-hydrodynamic modelling of floating offshore wind turbines in nonlinear waves using a direct time-domain approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    15. Mostafaeipour, Ali, 2010. "Feasibility study of offshore wind turbine installation in Iran compared with the world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(7), pages 1722-1743, September.
    16. Noorollahi, Younes & Ghenaatpisheh Senani, Ali & Fadaei, Ahmad & Simaee, Mobina & Moltames, Rahim, 2022. "A framework for GIS-based site selection and technical potential evaluation of PV solar farm using Fuzzy-Boolean logic and AHP multi-criteria decision-making approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 89-104.
    17. da Costa, Paulo & Verleijsdonk, Peter & Voorberg, Simon & Akcay, Alp & Kapodistria, Stella & van Jaarsveld, Willem & Zhang, Yingqian, 2023. "Policies for the dynamic traveling maintainer problem with alerts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1141-1152.
    18. deCastro, M. & Rusu, L. & Arguilé-Pérez, B. & Ribeiro, A. & Costoya, X. & Carvalho, D. & Gómez-Gesteira, M., 2024. "Different approaches to analyze the impact of future climate change on the exploitation of wave energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    19. Kouaissah, O. & Franchina, N. & Siddiqui, M.S. & Persico, G., 2024. "A computational study on the performance and wake development of a tilted H-Shaped VAWT rotor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    20. Rippel, Daniel & Jathe, Nicolas & Lütjen, Michael & Szczerbicka, Helena & Freitag, Michael, 2019. "Integrated domain model for operative offshore installation planning," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Digital Transformation in Maritime and City Logistics: Smart Solutions for Logistics. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics, volume 28, pages 25-54, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Energy Planning; Analytic Hierarchy Process; Offshore Wind; Renewable Energy;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D70 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - General
    • Q20 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - General
    • Q42 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy - - - Alternative Energy Sources

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2023-06-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.