IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ2/2020-05-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biogas Fed-fuel Cell Based Electricity Generation: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach

Author

Listed:
  • S. M. Shafie

    (School of Technology Management and Logistics, College of Business, University Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010 Kedah, Malaysia,)

  • Z. Othman

    (School of Technology Management and Logistics, College of Business, University Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010 Kedah, Malaysia,)

  • N. Hami

    (School of Technology Management and Logistics, College of Business, University Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010 Kedah, Malaysia,)

  • S. Omar

    (School of Technology Management and Logistics, College of Business, University Utara Malaysia, Sintok 06010 Kedah, Malaysia,)

  • A. H. Nu'man

    (Universitas Islam Bandung, Jalan Tamansari No. 20 Bandung 40116, West Java, Indonesia,)

  • N. N.A.N. Yusoff

    (Department of Energy, Minerals and Materials Technology,Universiti Malaysia Kelantan, 17600 Jeli, Kelantan, Malaysia,)

  • A. Shaf

    (Faculty of Technical and Vocational, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjung Malim, Perak, Malaysia.)

Abstract

The world is currently facing a scarcity of energy resources in the electricity generation sector. The current pattern of electricity generation has brought harm to the environment. Fuel cell provides a huge potential in reducing the negative environmental impacts. Malaysia as a tropical country has abundant sources of biogas production that can be fed into the fuel to produce electricity and water. The paper aimed to identify the environmental impact towards the consumption of biogas feeding into fuel cells for electricity generation. The result showed that in this modelling of system boundary, the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were high due to large contributions from the transportation and storage processes. Hopefully, the outcome from this study could help future researchers or stakeholders in making decisions to design fuel cells for electricity generation with minimum environmental impact contribution.

Suggested Citation

  • S. M. Shafie & Z. Othman & N. Hami & S. Omar & A. H. Nu'man & N. N.A.N. Yusoff & A. Shaf, 2020. "Biogas Fed-fuel Cell Based Electricity Generation: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 498-502.
    • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2020-05-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/download/9957/5311
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijeep/article/view/9957/5311
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aziz, Nur Izzah Hamna A. & Hanafiah, Marlia M., 2020. "Life cycle analysis of biogas production from anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 847-857.
    2. Cozzolino, Raffaello & Lombardi, Lidia & Tribioli, Laura, 2017. "Use of biogas from biowaste in a solid oxide fuel cell stack: Application to an off-grid power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 781-791.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khaled M. A. Salim & Ruhanita Maelah & Hawa Hishamuddin & Amizawati Mohd Amir & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman, 2022. "Two Decades of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs): A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Josipa Pavičić & Karolina Novak Mavar & Vladislav Brkić & Katarina Simon, 2022. "Biogas and Biomethane Production and Usage: Technology Development, Advantages and Challenges in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-28, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nur Izzah Hamna A. Aziz & Marlia M. Hanafiah & Shabbir H. Gheewala & Haikal Ismail, 2020. "Bioenergy for a Cleaner Future: A Case Study of Sustainable Biogas Supply Chain in the Malaysian Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Shi, Yi & Xu, Jiuping, 2023. "A multi-objective approach to kitchen waste and excess sludge co-digestion for biomethane production with anaerobic digestion," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    3. Hollas, C.E. & Bolsan, A.C. & Chini, A. & Venturin, B. & Bonassa, G. & Cândido, D. & Antes, F.G. & Steinmetz, R.L.R. & Prado, N.V. & Kunz, A., 2021. "Effects of swine manure storage time on solid-liquid separation and biogas production: A life-cycle assessment approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    4. Phuang, Zhen Xin & Woon, Kok Sin & Wong, Khai Jian & Liew, Peng Yen & Hanafiah, Marlia Mohd, 2021. "Unlocking the environmental hotspots of palm biodiesel upstream production in Malaysia via life cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    5. Kelechi E. Anyaoha & Lulu Zhang, 2023. "Technology-based comparative life cycle assessment for palm oil industry: the case of Nigeria," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 4575-4595, May.
    6. Dariusz Mikielewicz & Krzysztof Kosowski & Karol Tucki & Marian Piwowarski & Robert Stępień & Olga Orynycz & Wojciech Włodarski, 2019. "Gas Turbine Cycle with External Combustion Chamber for Prosumer and Distributed Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-19, September.
    7. Ouyang, Tiancheng & Zhang, Mingliang & Qin, Peijia & Liu, Wenjun & Shi, Xiaomin, 2022. "Converting waste into electric energy and carbon fixation through biosyngas-fueled SOFC hybrid system: A simulation study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 725-743.
    8. Wang, Zengli & Zhou, Hongyang & Hao, Muming & Wang, Jun & Geng, Maofei, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and comparative investigation of a novel total flow and Kalina cycle coupled system for fluctuating geothermal energy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    9. Wang, Yuqing & Wehrle, Lukas & Banerjee, Aayan & Shi, Yixiang & Deutschmann, Olaf, 2021. "Analysis of a biogas-fed SOFC CHP system based on multi-scale hierarchical modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 78-87.
    10. He Zhang & Ashish T. Asutosh & Junxue Zhang, 2022. "A quantitative sustainable comparative study of two biogas systems based on energy, emergy and entropy methods in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(12), pages 13583-13609, December.
    11. Naquash, Ahmad & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Haider, Junaid & Bokhari, Awais & Lim, Hankwon & Lee, Moonyong, 2022. "State-of-the-art assessment of cryogenic technologies for biogas upgrading: Energy, economic, and environmental perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Mehrabian, Morteza & Mahmoudimehr, Javad, 2023. "A correlation for optimal steam-to-fuel ratio in a biogas-fueled solid oxide fuel cell with internal steam reforming by using Artificial Neural Networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P1).
    13. Yin, Yongjun & Chen, Shaoxu & Li, Xusheng & Jiang, Bo & Zhao, Joe RuHe & Nong, Guangzai, 2021. "Comparative analysis of different CHP systems using biogas for the cassava starch plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    14. Cozzolino, Raffaello & Chiappini, Daniele & Tribioli, Laura, 2021. "Off-grid PV/URFC power plant fueled with biogas from food waste: An energetic and economic analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    15. García, Antonio & Monsalve-Serrano, Javier & Martínez-Boggio, Santiago & Rückert Roso, Vinícius & Duarte Souza Alvarenga Santos, Nathália, 2020. "Potential of bio-ethanol in different advanced combustion modes for hybrid passenger vehicles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 58-77.
    16. P.X.H. Bong & M.A. Malek & N.H. Mardi & Marlia M. Hanafiah, 2020. "Cradle-to-Gate Water-Related Impacts on Production of Traditional Food Products in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Dariusz Mikielewicz & Krzysztof Kosowski & Karol Tucki & Marian Piwowarski & Robert Stępień & Olga Orynycz & Wojciech Włodarski, 2019. "Influence of Different Biofuels on the Efficiency of Gas Turbine Cycles for Prosumer and Distributed Energy Power Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Majidniya, Mahdi & Remy, Benjamin & Boileau, Thierry & Zandi, Majid, 2021. "Free Piston Stirling Engine as a new heat recovery option for an Internal Reforming Solid Oxide Fuel Cell," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1188-1201.
    19. Krzysztof Kosowski & Marian Piwowarski, 2020. "Design Analysis of Micro Gas Turbines in Closed Cycles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-14, November.
    20. Fathabadi, Hassan, 2019. "Combining a proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) stack with a Li-ion battery to supply the power needs of a hybrid electric vehicle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 714-724.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Biogas; fuel cell; electricity generation; LCA; sustainability;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C32 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Time-Series Models; Dynamic Quantile Regressions; Dynamic Treatment Effect Models; Diffusion Processes; State Space Models
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • O47 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Empirical Studies of Economic Growth; Aggregate Productivity; Cross-Country Output Convergence

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ2:2020-05-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.