IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2024-06-41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial Performance Analysis of Energy Companies Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques: An Application in the BIST Electricity, Gas and Water Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Azize Kahramani Koc

    (Department of International Trade and Logistics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey)

  • Alper Tazegul

    (Department of International Trade and Logistics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey)

  • Savas Durmus

    (Department of International Trade and Logistics, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Kafkas University, Kars, Turkey)

Abstract

Energy plays a vital role in the macroeconomic development of countries. The increase in energy consumption and the increase in the number of energy companies are among the basic dynamics of country development and growth. Enhancing the financial performance of companies operating in the energy sector strengthens the competitive power of countries at both national and international levels. In this context, this study aims to determine the financial performance rankings of companies operating in the energy sector in Turkey over a 10-year period, identifying the most successful and least successful periods over the years. Using data from energy sector companies listed on Borsa Istanbul (BIST) between 2013 and 2022, after determining the research criteria, the weights of these criteria were calculated using the Entropy method. Subsequently, considering the criteria weights, the performance rankings of energy companies were determined year by year using the MAIRCA method. According to the results of the Entropy analysis, when the importance level is evaluated, the most significant criterion in 2013 was the Liquidity Ratio (LR), in 2014, 2017, 2018, and 2019 it was the Gross Profit Growth (GPG) criterion, in 2015 it was the Current Ratio (CR) criterion, in 2016 and 2022 it was the Net Profit Growth (NPG) criterion, and in 2020 it was the Net Profit Growth (NPG) criterion. Finally, in 2021, the most important criterion was determined to be EBITDA Growth (EBG). Furthermore, based on the MAIRCA analysis, the reasons behind the most successful and least successful years of the companies were explained using financial and activity reports, as well as special situation disclosure notifications obtained from the Public Disclosure Platform (PDP).

Suggested Citation

  • Azize Kahramani Koc & Alper Tazegul & Savas Durmus, 2024. "Financial Performance Analysis of Energy Companies Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques: An Application in the BIST Electricity, Gas and Water Sector," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 379-391, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-06-41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/17609/8391
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/17609
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Energy Sector; Financial Performance; Multi-Criteria Decision-making Methods; Türkiye;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K32 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Energy, Environmental, Health, and Safety Law
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • C58 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Financial Econometrics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-06-41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.