IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2024-06-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Critical Review of Overconfidence in Investment Decisions: A Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Shalini Ojha

    (Research Scholar, Department of Commerce, Gauhati University, Guwahati, Assam, India)

  • Amal Kumar Agarwala

    (Department of Statistics, Arya Vidyapeeth College (Autonomous), Guwahati, Assam, India)

Abstract

The precedence of behavior bias-based studies with respect to investment is quite prevalent. Hence, a bibliometric analysis of available literature may lead to fresh topics in association with overconfidence bias. The literature ranging between 1970 and 2024 were scanned using terms related to overconfidence in finance as keywords to reach the related publications. After screening, 1327 publications related to overconfidence, 728 documents were identified. Martin Weber emerged as the most cited author. SSRN electronic journal, qualitative research in financial matters and review of behavioral finance have published most cited papers in the field of overconfidence and investment decision. The United States have published highest number of papers and citations, while Germany, India and China have also emerged as nations with highest citations. The United States of America has published highest number of papers with citations. Germany, India and China have also emerged as nations with highly citated papers. Considering year on year growth in the publications, more work may be expected from the arena of overconfidence, and authors of the present study have taken the liberty to suggest a few possibilities that can be explored. Studies with risk tolerance, after pandemic impact, experience and financial/tax literacy, loss aversion and availability bias-based studies may be considered by researchers in accordance to overconfidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Shalini Ojha & Amal Kumar Agarwala, 2024. "A Critical Review of Overconfidence in Investment Decisions: A Bibliometric Analysis," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(6), pages 104-109, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-06-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/17098/8263
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/17098
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Bibliometric Analysis; Overconfidence; Investment Behaviour; Stock Market; Pandemic;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D03 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty
    • G02 - Financial Economics - - General - - - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G41 - Financial Economics - - Behavioral Finance - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-06-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.