IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2024-03-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ownership Structures, Executive Compensation and Tax Aggressiveness in Indonesia Mining and Plantation Companies: The Moderating Effect of Audit Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Eriana Kartadjumena

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty Economics and Business, Widyatama University, Bandung, Indonesia)

  • Nuryaman Nuryaman

    (Master of Accounting Study Program, Postgraduate School, Widyatama University, Bandung, Indonesia)

Abstract

This study examines how the ownership structure, executive compensation, and audit quality interact to influence tax aggressiveness in Indonesian mining and plantation companies. The proxy for ownership structures is institutional and family ownership, and the proxy for executive compensation is the total salary of directors per year. Meanwhile, the proxy for tax aggressiveness uses the cash effective tax rate, and audit quality is proxied by the Big Four audit firms. Research data were taken from the 233 annual reports of 47 mining and plantation companies that listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange during the period 2018–2022. The data were analyzed by a panel data regression technique. The results show that both institutional and family ownership have a significant positive effect on tax aggressiveness. While executive compensation has not influenced tax aggressiveness. Moreover, audit quality has a positive moderating effect on the negative relationship between family ownership and the cash effective tax rate. High-quality auditors can restrain family shareholders' ability to take aggressive tax positions. However, audit quality could not interact to influence the relationship between institutional ownership or executive compensation and tax aggressiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Eriana Kartadjumena & Nuryaman Nuryaman, 2024. "Ownership Structures, Executive Compensation and Tax Aggressiveness in Indonesia Mining and Plantation Companies: The Moderating Effect of Audit Quality," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 14(3), pages 23-32, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-03-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/15862/7878
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/15862
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Shuping & Chen, Xia & Cheng, Qiang & Shevlin, Terry, 2010. "Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 41-61, January.
    2. Hausman, Jerry, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    3. Amneh Alkurdi & Ghassan H. Mardini, 2020. "The impact of ownership structure and the board of directors’ composition on tax avoidance strategies: empirical evidence from Jordan," Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 18(4), pages 795-812, November.
    4. Wei Huang & Tingting Ying & Yun Shen, 2018. "Executive cash compensation and tax aggressiveness of Chinese firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1151-1180, November.
    5. Claessens, Stijn & Djankov, Simeon & Lang, Larry H. P., 2000. "The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 58(1-2), pages 81-112.
    6. Ferchichi Jihene & Dabboussi Moez, 2019. "The Moderating Effect of Audit Quality on CEO Compensation and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Tunisian Context," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 131-139.
    7. Safa Gaaya & Nadia Lakhal & Faten Lakhal, 2017. "Does family ownership reduce corporate tax avoidance? The moderating effect of audit quality," Post-Print hal-03562617, HAL.
    8. T. S. Breusch & A. R. Pagan, 1980. "The Lagrange Multiplier Test and its Applications to Model Specification in Econometrics," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 47(1), pages 239-253.
    9. Marziana Madah Marzuki & Muhammad Syukur Muhammad Al-Amin, 2021. "The effect of audit fees, audit quality and board ownership on tax aggressiveness: evidence from Thailand," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 29(5), pages 617-636, October.
    10. Desai, Mihir A. & Dharmapala, Dhammika, 2006. "Corporate tax avoidance and high-powered incentives," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 145-179, January.
    11. Nalom Siagian, 2024. "The Role of Economic Policies to Adopt Renewable Energy and Digital Technology on Business Decisions and HR Management in the Indonesian Mining Sector," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 14(2), pages 632-641, March.
    12. Armstrong, Christopher S. & Blouin, Jennifer L. & Jagolinzer, Alan D. & Larcker, David F., 2015. "Corporate Governance, Incentives, and Tax Avoidance," Research Papers 2134, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    13. Yunyun Jiang & Haitao Zheng & Ran Wang, 2021. "The effect of institutional ownership on listed companies’ tax avoidance strategies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(8), pages 880-896, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kovermann, Jost & Velte, Patrick, 2019. "The impact of corporate governance on corporate tax avoidance—A literature review," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Lee, Cheng-Hsun & Bose, Sudipta, 2021. "Do family firms engage in less tax avoidance than non-family firms? The corporate opacity perspective," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    3. Wei Huang & Tingting Ying & Yun Shen, 2018. "Executive cash compensation and tax aggressiveness of Chinese firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 1151-1180, November.
    4. Sabri Boubaker & Imen Derouiche & Hung Nguyen, 2022. "Voluntary disclosure, tax avoidance and family firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 26(1), pages 129-158, March.
    5. Ferchichi Jihene & Dabboussi Moez, 2019. "The Moderating Effect of Audit Quality on CEO Compensation and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Tunisian Context," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(1), pages 131-139.
    6. Athira, A. & Lukose, P.J. Jijo, 2023. "Do common institutional owners' activisms deter tax avoidance? Evidence from an emerging economy," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Kovermann, Jost & Wendt, Martin, 2019. "Tax avoidance in family firms: Evidence from large private firms," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 145-157.
    8. Shen, Yuxin & Xu, Hanwen & Yu, Shuangli & Xu, Wei & Shen, Yongjian, 2022. "Air pollution and tax avoidance: New evidence from China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 402-420.
    9. Shi, Xin & Hou, Jingru & Gu, Qiankun, 2023. "In-laws’ involvement in management and tax avoidance: Evidence from family firms in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    10. Long, Wenbin & Wu, Huiying & Li, Lidan & Ying, Sammy Xiaoyan & Li, Sihai, 2024. "Mixed-ownership structure, non-state-blockholder coalition, and tax avoidance," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    11. Jaehong Lee & Suyon Kim & Eunsoo Kim, 2021. "Designation as the Most Admired Firms to the Sustainable Management of Taxes: Evidence from South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-17, July.
    12. Qingyuan Li & Edward L. Maydew & Richard H. Willis & Li Xu, 2023. "Taxes and director independence: evidence from board reforms worldwide," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 910-957, June.
    13. Richardson, Grant & Wang, Bei & Zhang, Xinmin, 2016. "Ownership structure and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from publicly listed private firms in China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 141-158.
    14. Alharbi, Samar & Atawnah, Nader & Al Mamun, Md & Ali, Muhammad Jahangir, 2022. "Local culture and tax avoidance: Evidence from gambling preference behavior," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    15. Guangyong Lei & Wanwan Wang & Junli Yu & Kam C. Chan, 2022. "Cultural Diversity and Corporate Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Chinese Private Enterprises," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(2), pages 357-379, March.
    16. Gul, Ferdinand A. & Khedmati, Mehdi & Shams, Syed M.M., 2020. "Managerial acquisitiveness and corporate tax avoidance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    17. Bilicka, Katarzyna & Clancey-Shang, Danjue & Qi, Yaxuan, 2022. "Tax avoidance regulations and stock market responses," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    18. Jiang, Dequan & Li, Weiping & Shen, Yongjian & Yao, Zhenye, 2020. "Market liberalization and tax avoidance: Evidence from the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect Program in China," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).
    19. Akmalia M. Ariff & Khairul Anuar Kamarudin, 2019. "Institutional Quality, Tax Avoidance, and Analysts' Forecast: International Evidence," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 27(2), pages 15-35.
    20. Cao, Feng & Li, Sifei & Dai, Ming & Li, Jing, 2023. "Your heart is where your treasure is: Family chairman and tax avoidance in family-controlled firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Institutional Ownership; Family Ownership; Executive Compensation; Tax Aggressiveness; Audit Quality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • H26 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Tax Evasion and Avoidance
    • C23 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models
    • L72 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction - - - Mining, Extraction, and Refining: Other Nonrenewable Resources
    • M42 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Auditing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2024-03-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.