IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eco/journ1/2020-03-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Systematic Risk in Commercial Banks of Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Syed Fahad Ali Shah

    (Department of Economics, University of Chitral, Pakistan,)

  • Arif Hussain

    (Institute of Business Studies and Leadership, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan,)

  • Muhammad Khan

    (Department of Management Sciences, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan,)

  • Julija Jacquemod

    (Department of Business, RISEBA University, Latvia,)

  • Zahir Shah

    (Department of Business Administration, Yeungnam University, South Korea.)

Abstract

Various efforts are made to quantify and explain risk taking behavior including systematic risk with in financial institutions. This study is about determining various factors affecting commercial banks systematic risk in Pakistan. Sample included in the study consisted of twelve commercial banks listed in PSX (Pakistan Stock Exchange), these banks hold 81.3% market share of customer deposits. Data was collected from 2010 to 2016. The systematic risk for this study was calculated through stock beta (SB) and value at risk (VaR). To determine systematic risk the independent variables used are liquidity, firm size, asset quality, firm growth, return on assets, business mix, operating efficiency and loan growth. The result shows that liquidity, asset quality, return on assets and firm size have significant impact on systematic risk of banks in Pakistan.

Suggested Citation

  • Syed Fahad Ali Shah & Arif Hussain & Muhammad Khan & Julija Jacquemod & Zahir Shah, 2020. "Determinants of Systematic Risk in Commercial Banks of Pakistan," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(3), pages 125-129.
  • Handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2020-03-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/download/9794/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/9794/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asif Ali & Muhammad Khan & Amir Ishaq & Arif Hussain & Shams Ur Rehman & Imran Ali Khan & Syed Fahad Ali Shah, 2020. "Pakistan Textiles can Bounce Back Vigorously," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 30-40.
    2. Muhammad Ashfaque & Syed Mohsin Ali Shah & Fahad Sultan & Haider Khalil & Arif Hussain & Muhammad Khan, 2020. "Ethical Value Propositions of Islamic Banking Products: A Phenomenological Inquiry of Relationship Managers Perspective," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(2), pages 8-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sattar Khan & Yasir Kamal & Azhar Khan & Arif Hussain & Muhammad Rafiq & Maryam Bibi & Syed Fahad Ali Shah & Zahir Shah & Muhammad Khan, 2020. "The Impact of Ownership Types on the Value of Discretionary Accruals: What is the Role of Audit Committee? Evidence from Pakistan," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 141-150.
    2. Muhammad Sarmad & Naeem Ahmad & Muhammad Khan & Muhammad Irfan & Hajira Atta, 2020. "Investigating the Moderating Role of Trust between Social Media Capabilities and Consumer Brand Engagement Across Textile Sector of Pakistan," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 53-62.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Sarmad & Naeem Ahmad & Muhammad Khan & Muhammad Irfan & Hajira Atta, 2020. "Investigating the Moderating Role of Trust between Social Media Capabilities and Consumer Brand Engagement Across Textile Sector of Pakistan," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 10(4), pages 53-62.
    2. Nadeem Akhtar & Hidayat Ullah Khan & Muhammad Asif Jan & Cornelius B. Pratt & Ma Jianfu, 2021. "Exploring the Determinants of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and Its Impact on Local Communities," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    3. Shoaib Imtiaz & Arshad Ali & Zeeshan Khan & Mohib Ullah & Muhammad Khan & Julija Jacquemod, 2020. "Determinants of Youth Unemployment in Pakistan," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 171-177.
    4. Rafat Jan & Miraj Uddin & Ihsan Ullah & Mubarek Bibi & Sardar Nawaz & Mehnaz Rehmani & Salima Meherali, 2021. "Developing COVID‐19 emergency response centres in geographically challenged areas of Pakistan: A case study of the Aga Khan Development Network," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(6), pages 1990-1997, November.
    5. Hasan, Syed M. & Rehman, Attique & Zhang, Wendong, 2021. "Who can work and study from home in Pakistan: Evidence from a 2018–19 nationwide household survey," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    6. Muhammad Imran Malik & Mubashir Ahmad & Arif Hussain & Farida Saleem & Muhammad Kashif Durrani & Shabir Hyder & Saiqa Saddiqa Qureshi & Shoaib Imtiaz & Shumaila Malik, 2020. "Renewable Energy Products and Customer s Purchase Intentions having Environmental Concern," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 10(6), pages 14-21.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Systematic risk; Asset quality; Operating efficiency; Business mix;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G21 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Banks; Other Depository Institutions; Micro Finance Institutions; Mortgages
    • G32 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - Financing Policy; Financial Risk and Risk Management; Capital and Ownership Structure; Value of Firms; Goodwill

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eco:journ1:2020-03-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ilhan Ozturk (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econjournals.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.