IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-18-00297.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Long-run co-movements between oil prices and rig count in the presence of structural breaks

Author

Listed:
  • Nicoleta Iliescu

    (Iona College)

Abstract

In this article, we investigate the existence of long-run common trends (co-movements) shared by the WTI oil prices and the rig count variable in the US. To test for cointegration, we employ the Engle-Granger two-step procedure, the Johansen cointegration test, and the Gregory-Hansen procedure (which takes into account the possibility of structural breaks in the data). Both the Engle-Granger procedure and Johansen tests cannot find cointegration. However, the Gregory-Hansen procedure rejects the hypothesis of no cointegration at 1% in the specification which allows for structural breaks in the constant term, slope coefficients, and the trend term. In addition to cointegration, we examine the existence of any type of Granger-causality running between the two variables of interest. The Granger test identifies a bidirectional causality running between the two variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Nicoleta Iliescu, 2018. "Long-run co-movements between oil prices and rig count in the presence of structural breaks," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 38(2), pages 1171-1179.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-18-00297
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2018/Volume38/EB-18-V38-I2-P112.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ringlund, Guro Bornes & Rosendahl, Knut Einar & Skjerpen, Terje, 2008. "Does oilrig activity react to oil price changes An empirical investigation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 371-396, March.
    2. Ryan Kellogg, 2014. "The Effect of Uncertainty on Investment: Evidence from Texas Oil Drilling," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 104(6), pages 1698-1734, June.
    3. Khalifa, Ahmed & Caporin, Massimiliano & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2017. "The relationship between oil prices and rig counts: The importance of lags," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 213-226.
    4. Mohn, Klaus & Osmundsen, Petter, 2008. "Exploration economics in a regulated petroleum province: The case of the Norwegian Continental Shelf," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 303-320, March.
    5. Gregory, Allan W. & Hansen, Bruce E., 1996. "Residual-based tests for cointegration in models with regime shifts," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 99-126, January.
    6. Gerhard Toews and Alexander Naumov, 2015. "The Relationship Between Oil Price and Costs in the Oil Industry," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Adelman S).
    7. Alexander Naumov, 2015. "The Relationship Between Oil Price and Costs," OxCarre Working Papers 152, Oxford Centre for the Analysis of Resource Rich Economies, University of Oxford.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Massimiliano Caporin & Fulvio Fontini & Rocco Romaniello, 2024. "The Asymmetric Relationship between Conventional/Shale Rig Counts and WTI Oil Prices," The Energy Journal, , vol. 45(2), pages 137-187, March.
    2. Shakya, Shishir & Li, Bingxin & Etienne, Xiaoli, 2022. "Shale revolution, oil and gas prices, and drilling activities in the United States," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khalifa, Ahmed & Caporin, Massimiliano & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2017. "The relationship between oil prices and rig counts: The importance of lags," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 213-226.
    2. Shakya, Shishir & Li, Bingxin & Etienne, Xiaoli, 2022. "Shale revolution, oil and gas prices, and drilling activities in the United States," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    3. Johannes Mauritzen, 2017. "The Effect of Oil Prices on Field Production: Evidence from the Norwegian Continental Shelf," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 79(1), pages 124-144, February.
    4. Pernille Parmer & Steinar Strøm & Helge Sandvig Thorsen & Inger Ubbe & Bjørnar Andreas Kvinge, 2018. "Investments on the Norwegian Continental Shelf - An Empirical Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 7370, CESifo.
    5. Pedro Moreno Alonso & Antonio Mu oz San Roque, 2021. "Oil Costs and Prices: An Empirical Causality Analysis," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(3), pages 546-554.
    6. Klaus Mohn & Petter Osmundsen, 2011. "Asymmetry and uncertainty in capital formation: an application to oil investment," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(28), pages 4387-4401.
    7. Girard, Victoire & Kudebayeva, Alma & Toews, Gerhard, 2020. "Inflated Expectations and Commodity Prices: Evidence from Kazakhstan," GLO Discussion Paper Series 469, Global Labor Organization (GLO), revised 2020.
    8. Bergholt, Drago & Røisland, Øistein & Sveen, Tommy & Torvik, Ragnar, 2023. "Monetary policy when export revenues drop," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    9. Philippe Le Billon & Berit Kristoffersen, 2020. "Just cuts for fossil fuels? Supply-side carbon constraints and energy transition," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(6), pages 1072-1092, September.
    10. Taran Fæhn & Cathrine Hagem & Lars Lindholt & Ståle Mæland & Knut Einar Rosendahl, 2017. "Climate Policies in a Fossil Fuel Producing Country: Demand versus Supply Side Policies," The Energy Journal, , vol. 38(1), pages 77-102, January.
    11. Jamil, Faisal, 2024. "Empirical analysis of investment in Pakistan’s upstream sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    12. Malova, Aleksandra & van der Ploeg, Frederick, 2017. "Consequences of lower oil prices and stranded assets for Russia's sustainable fiscal stance," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 27-40.
    13. Sabet, Amir H. & Heaney, Richard, 2017. "Real options and the value of oil and gas firms: An empirical analysis," Journal of Commodity Markets, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 50-65.
    14. Bøe, Kristine S. & Jordal, Therese & Mikula, Štepán & Molnár, Peter, 2019. "Do political risks harm development of oil fields?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 338-358.
    15. Ansari, Dawud, 2017. "OPEC, Saudi Arabia, and the shale revolution: Insights from equilibrium modelling and oil politics," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 111, pages 166-178.
    16. Skjerpen, Terje & Storrøsten, Halvor Briseid & Rosendahl, Knut Einar & Osmundsen, Petter, 2018. "Modelling and forecasting rig rates on the Norwegian Continental Shelf," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 220-239.
    17. Jamil, Faisal, 2012. "Impact of different public E&P policies on natural gas reserves and production in Pakistan," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 368-374.
    18. Smith, James L. & Lee, Thomas K., 2017. "The price elasticity of U.S. shale oil reserves," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 121-135.
    19. Mohn, Klaus, 2009. "Elastic Oil. A primer on the economics of exploration and production," UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2009/10, University of Stavanger.
    20. Cust,James Frederick & Rivera Ballesteros,Alexis & Zeufack,Albert G., 2022. "The Dog that Didn’t Bark : The Missed Opportunity of Africa’s Resource Boom," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10120, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    oil prices; rig count; structural breaks; cointegration; Granger-causality;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q4 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy
    • C5 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-18-00297. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.