IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ebl/ecbull/eb-12-00576.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Shapley value for fuzzy games: TU games approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Hsien Liao

    (Department of Applied Mathematics, National Pingtung University of Education, Taiwan)

Abstract

In this note we investigate the Shapley value for fuzzy games proposed by Hwang and Liao (2009). We show that there exists a transferable-utility (TU) decomposition games that can be adopted to characterize the fuzzy Shapley value, i.e., the fuzzy Shapley value consists of the Shapley value of the corresponding TU decomposition games.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Hsien Liao, 2013. "The Shapley value for fuzzy games: TU games approach," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 33(1), pages 192-197.
    • Handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-12-00576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2013/Volume33/EB-13-V33-I1-P18.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brânzei, R. & Dimitrov, D.A. & Tijs, S.H., 2002. "Convex Fuzzy Games and Participation Monotonic Allocation Schemes," Discussion Paper 2002-13, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    2. Tsurumi, Masayo & Tanino, Tetsuzo & Inuiguchi, Masahiro, 2001. "A Shapley function on a class of cooperative fuzzy games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(3), pages 596-618, March.
    3. Branzei, R. & Tijs, S.H., 2003. "On convex fuzzy games," Other publications TiSEM b53ebd70-807d-46cf-a854-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Hart, Sergiu & Mas-Colell, Andreu, 1989. "Potential, Value, and Consistency," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 589-614, May.
    5. Jean-Pierre Aubin, 1981. "Cooperative Fuzzy Games," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(1), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Branzei, Rodica & Dimitrov, Dinko & Tijs, Stef, 2004. "Egalitarianism in convex fuzzy games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(3), pages 313-325, May.
    2. Fanyong Meng & Xiaohong Chen & Chunqiao Tan, 2016. "Cooperative fuzzy games with interval characteristic functions," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Gerwald Gulick & Henk Norde, 2013. "Fuzzy cores and fuzzy balancedness," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 77(2), pages 131-146, April.
    4. C. Manuel & D. Martín, 2021. "A value for communication situations with players having different bargaining abilities," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 301(1), pages 161-182, June.
    5. Yu-Hsien Liao, 2017. "Fuzzy games: a complement-consistent solution, axiomatizations and dynamic approaches," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 257-268, September.
    6. Yaron Azrieli & Ehud Lehrer, 2007. "On some families of cooperative fuzzy games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 36(1), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Branzei, Rodica & Dimitrov, Dinko & Tijs, Stef, 2004. "Hypercubes and compromise values for cooperative fuzzy games," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(3), pages 733-740, June.
    8. Zuofeng Gao & Yongbo Yu & Hongxin Bai & Chunyan Han, 2008. "A Repeated Convex Fuzzy Cooperative Game," Modern Applied Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(3), pages 1-54, May.
    9. Wenbo Yang & Jiuqiang Liu & Xiaodong Liu, 2011. "Aubin cores and bargaining sets for convex cooperative fuzzy games," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 40(3), pages 467-479, August.
    10. Conrado M. Manuel & Daniel Martín, 2020. "A Monotonic Weighted Shapley Value," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 29(4), pages 627-654, August.
    11. van Gulick, G. & Norde, H.W., 2011. "Fuzzy Cores and Fuzzy Balancedness," Other publications TiSEM 5792b50b-8b99-46dd-bba5-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    12. Yaron Azrieli & Ehud Lehrer, 2005. "Cooperative investment games or population games," Game Theory and Information 0503007, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Brânzei, R. & Dimitrov, D.A. & Tijs, S.H., 2002. "Convex Fuzzy Games and Participation Monotonic Allocation Schemes," Discussion Paper 2002-13, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    14. Stefano Moretti & Fioravante Patrone, 2008. "Transversality of the Shapley value," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 1-41, July.
    15. Fernández, J.R. & Gallego, I. & Jiménez-Losada, A. & Ordóñez, M., 2016. "Cooperation among agents with a proximity relation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 555-565.
    16. Jiménez-Losada, Andrés & Fernández, Julio R. & Ordóñez, Manuel & Grabisch, Michel, 2010. "Games on fuzzy communication structures with Choquet players," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(2), pages 836-847, December.
    17. Yan-an Hwang & Ming-chuan Chen, 2012. "A new axiomatization of the Shapley value under interval uncertainty," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(1), pages 799-810.
    18. Tido Takeng, Rodrigue, 2022. "Uncertain production environment and communication structure," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    19. Yu-Hsien Liao, 2024. "Fuzzy Assessment Mechanisms under Multi-Objective Considerations," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-15, September.
    20. Zijun Li & Fanyong Meng, 2023. "The potential and consistency of the Owen value for fuzzy cooperative games with a coalition structure," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 387-414, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Fuzzy games; TU decomposition games.;

    JEL classification:

    • C7 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory
    • C0 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebl:ecbull:eb-12-00576. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: John P. Conley (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.