IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/dem/demres/v28y2013i41.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patterns of contraceptive use among Mexican-origin women

Author

Listed:
  • Kari White

    (University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB))

  • Joseph E. Potter

    (University of Texas at Austin)

Abstract

Background: Mexican women in the United States (US) have higher rates of fertility compared to other ethnic groups and women in Mexico. Whether variation in women’s access to family planning services or patterns of contraceptive use contributes to this higher fertility has received little attention. Objective: We explore Mexican women’s contraceptive use, taking into account women’s place in the reproductive life course. Methods: Using nationally representative samples from the US (National Survey of Family Growth) and Mexico (Encuesta National de la Dinámica Demográfica), we compared the parity-specific frequency of contraceptive use and fertility intentions for non-migrant women, foreign-born Mexicans in the US, US-born Mexicans, and whites. Results: Mexican women in the US were less likely to use IUDs and more likely to use hormonal contraception than women in Mexico. Female sterilization was the most common method among higher parity women in both the US and Mexico, however, foreign-born Mexicans were less likely to be sterilized, and the least likely to use any permanent contraceptive method. Although foreign-born Mexicans were slightly less likely to report that they did not want more children, differences in method use remained after controlling for women’s fertility intentions. Conclusions: At all parities, foreign-born Mexicans used less effective methods. These findings suggest that varying access to family planning services may contribute to variation in women’s contraceptive use. Comments: Future studies are needed to clarify the extent to which disparities in fertility result from differences in contraceptive access.

Suggested Citation

  • Kari White & Joseph E. Potter, 2013. "Patterns of contraceptive use among Mexican-origin women," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 28(41), pages 1199-1212.
  • Handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:28:y:2013:i:41
    DOI: 10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.41
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol28/41/28-41.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.4054/DemRes.2013.28.41?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alfonso Miranda, 2006. "Are young cohorts of women delaying first birth in Mexico?," Journal of Population Economics, Springer;European Society for Population Economics, vol. 19(1), pages 55-70, February.
    2. Joseph E. Potter, 1999. "The Persistence of Outmoded Contraceptive Regimes: The Cases of Mexico and Brazil," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 25(4), pages 703-739, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kate Choi & Erin R. Hamilton, 2016. "Understanding patterns of contraceptive use among never married Mexican American women," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 34(40), pages 1129-1160.
    2. Chenoa A. Flippen & Rebecca A. Schut, 2022. "Migration and Contraception among Mexican Women: Assessing Selection, Disruption, and Adaptation," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(2), pages 495-520, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leticia Marteleto & Molly Dondero, 2013. "Maternal age at first birth and adolescent education in Brazil," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 28(28), pages 793-820.
    2. Ernesto F. L. Amaral & Mariana Eugenio Almeida & Guilherme Quaresma Goncalves, 2015. "Characterization of Fertility Levels in Brazil, 1970-2010," Working Papers WR-1091, RAND Corporation.
    3. Chenoa A. Flippen & Rebecca A. Schut, 2022. "Migration and Contraception among Mexican Women: Assessing Selection, Disruption, and Adaptation," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(2), pages 495-520, April.
    4. Amaral, Ernesto F. L., 2019. "Profile of female sterilization in Brazil," OSF Preprints qt3w2, Center for Open Science.
    5. Kevin Ralston & Vernon Gayle & Paul Lambert, 2016. "Gender, Occupation and First Birth: Do ‘Career Men’ Delay First Birth Too?," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 21(1), pages 90-101, February.
    6. Ernesto F. L. Amaral, 2019. "Profile of Female Sterilization in Brazil," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Jennifer Johnson-Hanks, 2004. "Uncertainty and the Second Space: Modern Birth Timing and the Dilemma of Education," European Journal of Population, Springer;European Association for Population Studies, vol. 20(4), pages 351-373, December.
    8. Hopkins, Kristine & Maria Barbosa, Regina & Riva Knauth, Daniela & Potter, Joseph E., 2005. "The impact of health care providers on female sterilization among HIV-positive women in Brazil," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 541-554, August.
    9. Letícia Marteleto & Laetícia Souza, 2012. "The Changing Impact of Family Size on Adolescents’ Schooling: Assessing the Exogenous Variation in Fertility Using Twins in Brazil," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 49(4), pages 1453-1477, November.
    10. Eduardo L. G. Rios‐Neto & Adriana Miranda‐Ribeiro & Paula Miranda‐Ribeiro, 2018. "Fertility Differentials by Education in Brazil: From the Conclusion of Fertility to the Onset of Postponement Transition," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 44(3), pages 489-517, September.
    11. Gunes, Pinar Mine & Tsaneva, Magda, 2020. "The effects of teenage childbearing on education, physical health, and mental distress: evidence from Mexico," Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 86(2), pages 183-206, June.
    12. Pamela Ortiz Arévalo, 2009. "Does sex education influence sexual and reproductive behaviour of women? Evidence from Mexico," Working Papers. Serie AD 2009-01, Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie).
    13. Ernesto F. L. Amaral & Joseph E. Potter, 2015. "Determinants of Female Sterilization in Brazil, 2001-2007," Working Papers WR-1093, RAND Corporation.
    14. Amaral, Ernesto F. L. & Potter, Joseph E, 2018. "Factors associated with female sterilization in Brazil," OSF Preprints bd4ra, Center for Open Science.
    15. Ernesto F. L. Amaral, 2015. "Profile of Female Sterilization in Brazil, 2001—2006," Working Papers WR-1092-1, RAND Corporation.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fertility; contraceptive use; Mexico; United States of America; immigrants; fertility intentions; family planning services;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J1 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dem:demres:v:28:y:2013:i:41. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.demogr.mpg.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.