IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fserec/y2012p121-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Operational Risks in Shipbuilding Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela MATEI

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

  • Mioara CHIRITA

    (Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Romania)

Abstract

Our paper emphasizes the opportunities provided both for the academic research and companies by using a proposed model of analyzing the operational risks within business in general and shipbuilding industry in particular. The model aims to display the loss distribution from the operational risk for each business line/ type of event, based on frequency and severity estimation of the events. These estimations are derived mainly from the history logs of internal loss events. The calculations extend over a certain period of time in the future with a certain level of confidence. It should also be mentioned that the proposed model estimates unexpected losses, without making any suppositions concerning the values of the expected and unexpected losses. Several ideas could be extracted by analyzing and synthesizing the theoretical models from available literature. These ideas were analyzed in order to develop a model for operational risk analysis that is adapted to shipbuilding. This paper describes a new model, which can be applied to the naval industry to quantify operational risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela MATEI & Mioara CHIRITA, 2012. "Analysis of Operational Risks in Shipbuilding Industry," Risk in Contemporary Economy, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, pages 121-130.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fserec:y:2012:p:121-130
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.rce.feaa.ugal.ro/images/stories/RCE2012/economics/MateiChirita.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chavez-Demoulin, V. & Embrechts, P. & Neslehova, J., 2006. "Quantitative models for operational risk: Extremes, dependence and aggregation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 2635-2658, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iñaki Aldasoro & Leonardo Gambacorta & Paolo Giudici & Thomas Leach, 2023. "Operational and Cyber Risks in the Financial Sector," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 19(5), pages 340-402, December.
    2. Stefan Mittnik & Sandra Paterlini & Tina Yener, 2011. "Operational–risk Dependencies and the Determination of Risk Capital," Center for Economic Research (RECent) 070, University of Modena and Reggio E., Dept. of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    3. Peters, Gareth W. & Shevchenko, Pavel V. & Young, Mark & Yip, Wendy, 2011. "Analytic loss distributional approach models for operational risk from the α-stable doubly stochastic compound processes and implications for capital allocation," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 565-579.
    4. Robert Jarrow & Jeff Oxman & Yildiray Yildirim, 2010. "The cost of operational risk loss insurance," Review of Derivatives Research, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 273-295, October.
    5. Dionne, Georges & Saissi-Hassani, Samir, 2016. "Hidden Markov Regimes in Operational Loss Data: Application to the Recent Financial Crisis," Working Papers 15-3, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    6. Uddin, Md Hamid & Mollah, Sabur & Islam, Nazrul & Ali, Md Hakim, 2023. "Does digital transformation matter for operational risk exposure?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Eckert, Christian & Gatzert, Nadine, 2017. "Modeling operational risk incorporating reputation risk: An integrated analysis for financial firms," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 122-137.
    8. Jianping Li & Lu Wei & Cheng-Few Lee & Xiaoqian Zhu & Dengsheng Wu, 2018. "Financial statements based bank risk aggregation," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(3), pages 673-694, April.
    9. Mark Bentley & Alec Stephenson & Peter Toscas & Zili Zhu, 2020. "A Multivariate Model to Quantify and Mitigate Cybersecurity Risk," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Robert Jarrow, 2017. "Operational Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: THE ECONOMIC FOUNDATIONS OF RISK MANAGEMENT Theory, Practice, and Applications, chapter 8, pages 69-70, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    11. Lu, Zhaoyang, 2011. "Modeling the yearly Value-at-Risk for operational risk in Chinese commercial banks," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 82(4), pages 604-616.
    12. Brechmann, Eike & Czado, Claudia & Paterlini, Sandra, 2014. "Flexible dependence modeling of operational risk losses and its impact on total capital requirements," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 271-285.
    13. Stefan Strecker & David Heise & Ulrich Frank, 2011. "RiskM: A multi-perspective modeling method for IT risk assessment," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 595-611, September.
    14. Gonzalo, J. & Olmo, J., 2007. "The impact of heavy tails and comovements in downside-risk diversification," Working Papers 07/02, Department of Economics, City University London.
    15. Silvia Figini & Lijun Gao & Paolo Giudici, 2013. "Bayesian operational risk models," DEM Working Papers Series 047, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.
    16. Kley, Oliver & Klüppelberg, Claudia & Paterlini, Sandra, 2020. "Modelling extremal dependence for operational risk by a bipartite graph," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    17. Di Lascio, F. Marta L. & Giammusso, Davide & Puccetti, Giovanni, 2018. "A clustering approach and a rule of thumb for risk aggregation," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 236-248.
    18. Ji, Jingru & Wang, Donghua & Xu, Dinghai & Xu, Chi, 2020. "Combining a self-exciting point process with the truncated generalized Pareto distribution: An extreme risk analysis under price limits," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 52-70.
    19. Tan, Yi Lin & Yusof, Mimi Syazwani & Mohd Ali, Nur Aqilah & Mohamed Azmi, Zahirah, 2018. "The Influence of Corporate Governance to the Firm Performance in Logistics Industry," MPRA Paper 86895, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Xiaolin Luo & Pavel V. Shevchenko & John B. Donnelly, 2009. "Addressing the Impact of Data Truncation and Parameter Uncertainty on Operational Risk Estimates," Papers 0904.2910, arXiv.org.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fserec:y:2012:p:121-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.