IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ddj/fseeai/y2021i1p143-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systemic Risk in Indian Banking: Measurement and Impact of COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Kalpakam G

    (K J Somaiya Institute of Management, Vidyavihar, Mumbai, India)

  • Krina TRIVEDI

    (K J Somaiya Institute of Management, Vidyavihar, Mumbai, India)

Abstract

This study examines the systemic risk in the Indian banking system using two models. The systemic risk cube explains the importance of measuring systemic risk in a scenario like contagion and systemic risk measurement index SRISK as proposed by NYU stern. Measurement of SRISK is done for two time-periods: before COVID-19 i.e. February 2020 and after COVID-19 i.e. February 2021. The findings show that the COVID-19 pandemic has not shown increase in SRISK considerably unlike 2009 crisis when the SRISK increased considerably, causing an economic downturn. The banking system remains a vital part for economic stability and studying the financial system to scale its impact on the economy during extreme events like in a pandemic remains an unflinching necessity of the time.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalpakam G & Krina TRIVEDI, 2021. "Systemic Risk in Indian Banking: Measurement and Impact of COVID-19," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 143-151.
    • Handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2021:i:1:p:143-151
    DOI: 10.35219/eai15840409177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eia.feaa.ugal.ro/images/eia/2021_1/Kalpakam_Trivedi.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.35219/eai15840409177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Härdle, Wolfgang Karl & Wang, Weining & Yu, Lining, 2016. "TENET: Tail-Event driven NETwork risk," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(2), pages 499-513.
    2. Mert Demirer & Francis X. Diebold & Laura Liu & Kamil Yilmaz, 2018. "Estimating global bank network connectedness," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(1), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Suresh Sundaresan & Zhenyu Wang, 2015. "On the Design of Contingent Capital with a Market Trigger," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 70(2), pages 881-920, April.
    4. Elijah Brewer & Julapa Jagtiani, 2013. "How Much Did Banks Pay to Become Too-Big-To-Fail and to Become Systemically Important?," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 43(1), pages 1-35, February.
    5. Arnoud W. A. Boot & Lev Ratnovski, 2016. "Banking and Trading," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 20(6), pages 2219-2246.
    6. Freixas, Xavier & Parigi, Bruno M & Rochet, Jean-Charles, 2000. "Systemic Risk, Interbank Relations, and Liquidity Provision by the Central Bank," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 32(3), pages 611-638, August.
    7. Chen Zhou, 2010. "Are Banks Too Big to Fail? Measuring Systemic Importance of Financial Institutions," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 6(34), pages 205-250, December.
    8. Akio Hattori & Kentaro Kikuchi & Fuminori Niwa & Yoshihiko Uchida, 2014. "A Survey of Systemic Risk Measures: Methodology and Application to the Japanese Market," IMES Discussion Paper Series 14-E-03, Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan.
    9. Gabriela-Victoria Anghelache & Dumitru-Cristian Oanea, 2016. "Romanian Commercial Banks’ Systemic Risk and Its Determinants: A CoVAR Approach," International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, vol. 6(3), pages 96-109, July.
    10. Verma, Ramprasad & Ahmad, Wasim & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Bekiros, Stelios, 2019. "Analysing the systemic risk of Indian banks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 103-108.
    11. Allen, Franklin & Jagtiani, Julapa & Goldstein, Itay, 2018. "The Interplay between Financial Regulations, Resilience, and Growth," CEPR Discussion Papers 12861, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    12. Gang-Jin Wang & Chi Xie & Kaijian He & H. Eugene Stanley, 2017. "Extreme risk spillover network: application to financial institutions," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(9), pages 1417-1433, September.
    13. Patro, Dilip K. & Qi, Min & Sun, Xian, 2013. "A simple indicator of systemic risk," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 9(1), pages 105-116.
    14. Viral Acharya & Robert Engle & Matthew Richardson, 2012. "Capital Shortfall: A New Approach to Ranking and Regulating Systemic Risks," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(3), pages 59-64, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahmad, Wasim & Tiwari, Shiv Ratan & Wadhwani, Akshay & Khan, Mohammad Azeem & Bekiros, Stelios, 2023. "Financial networks and systemic risk vulnerabilities: A tale of Indian banks," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    2. Zhang, Weiping & Zhuang, Xintian & Wang, Jian & Lu, Yang, 2020. "Connectedness and systemic risk spillovers analysis of Chinese sectors based on tail risk network," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    3. Silva, Walmir & Kimura, Herbert & Sobreiro, Vinicius Amorim, 2017. "An analysis of the literature on systemic financial risk: A survey," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 28(C), pages 91-114.
    4. Foglia, Matteo & Addi, Abdelhamid & Angelini, Eliana, 2022. "The Eurozone banking sector in the time of COVID-19: Measuring volatility connectedness," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    5. Verma, Ramprasad & Ahmad, Wasim & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Bekiros, Stelios, 2019. "Analysing the systemic risk of Indian banks," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 103-108.
    6. Wang, Gang-Jin & Jiang, Zhi-Qiang & Lin, Min & Xie, Chi & Stanley, H. Eugene, 2018. "Interconnectedness and systemic risk of China's financial institutions," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 1-18.
    7. Addi, Abdelhamid & Bouoiyour, Jamal, 2023. "Interconnectedness and extreme risk: Evidence from dual banking systems," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Chen, Wei & Hou, Xiaoli & Jiang, Manrui & Jiang, Cheng, 2022. "Identifying systemically important financial institutions in complex network: A case study of Chinese stock market," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    9. Yaya Su & Zhehao Huang & Benjamin M. Drakeford, 2019. "Monetary Policy, Industry Heterogeneity and Systemic Risk—Based on a High Dimensional Network Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Jean-Baptiste Hasse, 2022. "Systemic risk: a network approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 313-344, July.
    11. Yu Chen & Jie Hu & Weiping Zhang, 2020. "Too Connected to Fail? Evidence from a Chinese Financial Risk Spillover Network," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 28(6), pages 78-100, November.
    12. Jean-Baptiste Hasse, 2020. "Systemic Risk: a Network Approach," Working Papers halshs-02893780, HAL.
    13. Foglia, Matteo & Addi, Abdelhamid & Wang, Gang-Jin & Angelini, Eliana, 2022. "Bearish Vs Bullish risk network: A Eurozone financial system analysis," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Baumöhl, Eduard & Bouri, Elie & Hoang, Thi-Hong-Van & Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain & Výrost, Tomáš, 2020. "Increasing systemic risk during the Covid-19 pandemic: A cross-quantilogram analysis of the banking sector," EconStor Preprints 222580, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    15. Mihir Dash, 2021. "Non-Performing Loans and Systemic Risk of Indian Banks," Journal of Applied Management and Investments, Department of Business Administration and Corporate Security, International Humanitarian University, vol. 10(1), pages 10-20, April.
    16. Ouyang, Zisheng & Zhou, Xuewei & Wang, Gang-jin & Liu, Shuwen & Lu, Min, 2024. "Multilayer networks in the frequency domain: Measuring volatility connectedness among Chinese financial institutions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 909-928.
    17. Martin Eling & David Antonius Pankoke, 2016. "Systemic Risk in the Insurance Sector: A Review and Directions for Future Research," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 19(2), pages 249-284, September.
    18. Dai, Zhifeng & Tang, Rui & Zhang, Xiaotong, 2023. "A new multilayer network for measuring interconnectedness among the energy firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    19. Wang, Gang-Jin & Chen, Yang-Yang & Si, Hui-Bin & Xie, Chi & Chevallier, Julien, 2021. "Multilayer information spillover networks analysis of China’s financial institutions based on variance decompositions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 325-347.
    20. Dai, Zhifeng & Tang, Rui & Zhang, Xinhua, 2023. "Multilayer network analysis for measuring the inter-connectedness between the oil market and G20 stock markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ddj:fseeai:y:2021:i:1:p:143-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gianina Mihai (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fegalro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.