IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/nierev/v253y2020ipr4-r17_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Uk Interregional Inequality In A Historical And International Comparative Context

Author

Listed:
  • Carrascal-Incera, Andre
  • McCann, Philip
  • Ortega-Argilés, Raquel
  • Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés

Abstract

This paper explores the nature and scale of inter-regional and inter-urban inequalities in the UK in the context of international comparisons and our aim is to identify the extent to which such inequalities are associated with strong national economic performance. In order to do this, we first discuss the evolution of UK interregional inequalities relative to comparator European economies over more than a century. We then focus specifically on comparisons between the UK and the reunified Germany. These two exercises demonstrate that the experience of the UK has been rather different to other countries. We further explore UK inter-urban inequalities in the light of international evidence and then explain why observations of cities only tell us a partial story about the nature of interregional inequalities, especially in the case of the UK. Finally, we move onto an OECD-wide analysis of the relationships between economic growth and interregional inequality. What we observe is that any such relationships are very weak, and the only real evidence of a positive relationship is in the post-2008 crisis period, a result which points to differentials in regional resilience rather than inequality-led growth. Moreover, once former transition economies are removed from the sample, the relationship disappears, or if anything becomes slightly negative. As such, the international evidence suggests that the UK’s very high spatial inequalities have hampered, rather than facilitated, national economic growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Carrascal-Incera, Andre & McCann, Philip & Ortega-Argilés, Raquel & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2020. "Uk Interregional Inequality In A Historical And International Comparative Context," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 253, pages 4-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:nierev:v:253:y:2020:i::p:r4-r17_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0027950120000265/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. André Carrascal & Luis Orea, "undated". "TFP growth, embeddedness, and Covid-19: a novel production model that allows estimating trade elasticities," Working Papers 6, International Society for Efficiency and Productivity Analysis.
    2. John Gathergood & Fabian Gunzinger & Benedict Guttman-Kenney & Edika Quispe-Torreblanca & Neil Stewart, 2020. "Levelling Down and the COVID-19 Lockdowns: Uneven Regional Recovery in UK Consumer Spending," Papers 2012.09336, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2020.
    3. Bhattacharjee, Arnab & Lisauskaite, Elena & Pabst, Adrian, 2021. "UK regional outlook," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 2, pages 42-57.
    4. Natalia Zdanowska & Robin Morphet, 2021. "Decentralising the United Kingdom: the Northern Powerhouse strategy and urban ownership links between firms since 2010," Papers 2103.08627, arXiv.org.
    5. Mark Fransham & Max Herbertson & Mihaela Pop & Margarida Bandeira Morais & Neil Lee, 2023. "Level best? The levelling up agenda and UK regional inequality," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(11), pages 2339-2352, November.
    6. John Holden & Marianne Sensier & Richard Allmendinger, 2021. "The North West of England's Productivity Challenge: Exploring the issues," Insight Papers 003, The Productivity Institute.
    7. David Richards & Sam Warner & Martin J Smith & Diane Coyle, 2023. "Crisis and state transformation: Covid-19, levelling up and the UK’s incoherent state," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(1), pages 31-48.
    8. van Ark, Bart & de Vries, Klaas & Erumban, Abdul, 2021. "How To Not Miss A Productivity Revival Once Again," National Institute Economic Review, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, vol. 255, pages 9-24, February.
    9. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Terrero-Dávila, Javier & Lee, Neil, 2023. "Left-behind vs. unequal places: interpersonal inequality, economic decline, and the rise of populism in the US and Europe," CEPR Discussion Papers 18049, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Overman, Henry G. & Xu, Xiaowei, 2024. "Spatial disparities across labour markets," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 121453, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Adrian Pabst & Andrew Westwood, 2021. "The Politics of Productivity: institutions, governance and policy," Working Papers 015, The Productivity Institute.
    12. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Javier Terrero-Dávila & Neil Lee, 2023. "Left-behind versus unequal places: interpersonal inequality, economic decline and the rise of populism in the USA and Europe," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 23(5), pages 951-977.
    13. Niesr, 2021. "Appendix," National Institute UK Economic Outlook, National Institute of Economic and Social Research, issue 2, pages 58-66.
    14. Suss, Joel, 2023. "Measuring local, salient economic inequality in the UK," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117884, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. Andres Rodriguez-Pose & Javier Terrero-Davila & Neil Lee, 2023. "Left-behind vs. unequal places: interpersonal inequality, economic decline, and the rise of populism in the US and Europe," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 2306, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Mar 2023.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:nierev:v:253:y:2020:i::p:r4-r17_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/niesruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.