IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/netsci/v7y2019i01p20-51_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A theoretical and empirical comparison of the temporal exponential random graph model and the stochastic actor-oriented model

Author

Listed:
  • Leifeld, Philip
  • Cranmer, Skyler J.

Abstract

The temporal exponential random graph model (TERGM) and the stochastic actor-oriented model (SAOM, e.g., SIENA) are popular models for longitudinal network analysis. We compare these models theoretically, via simulation, and through a real-data example in order to assess their relative strengths and weaknesses. Though we do not aim to make a general claim about either being superior to the other across all specifications, we highlight several theoretical differences the analyst might consider and find that with some specifications, the two models behave very similarly, while each model out-predicts the other one the more the specific assumptions of the respective model are met.

Suggested Citation

  • Leifeld, Philip & Cranmer, Skyler J., 2019. "A theoretical and empirical comparison of the temporal exponential random graph model and the stochastic actor-oriented model," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 20-51, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:7:y:2019:i:01:p:20-51_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2050124218000267/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhou Nie, 2023. "Using Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks to Understand Meta-Communication in Digital Media," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-11, April.
    2. Xiaoyi Shi & Xiaoxia Huang & Huifang Liu, 2022. "Research on the Structural Features and Influence Mechanism of the Low-Carbon Technology Cooperation Network Based on Temporal Exponential Random Graph Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    3. Liu, Linqing & Shen, Mengyun & Sun, Da & Yan, Xiaofei & Hu, Shi, 2022. "Preferential attachment, R&D expenditure and the evolution of international trade networks from the perspective of complex networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 603(C).
    4. Zhao, Guimei & Li, Wenxiu & Geng, Yong & Bleischwitz, Raimund, 2023. "Uncovering the features of global antimony resource trade network," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    5. Xu, Yu & Hazée, Simon & So, Kevin Kam Fung & Li, K. Daisy & Malthouse, Edward Carl, 2021. "An evolutionary perspective on the dynamics of service platform ecosystems for the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 127-136.
    6. Linyan Wang & Haiqing Hu & Xianzhu Wang, 2022. "The Dynamic Evolution of the Structure of an Urban Housing Investment Niche Network and Its Underlying Mechanisms: A Case Study of 35 Large and Medium-Sized Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-21, March.
    7. Duxbury, Scott W, 2019. "Mediation and Moderation in Statistical Network Models," SocArXiv 9bs4u, Center for Open Science.
    8. Ruck, Damian J. & Bentley, R. Alexander & Borycz, Joshua, 2021. "Early warning of vulnerable counties in a pandemic using socio-economic variables," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    9. Alexandra Goritz & Nina Kolleck & Helge Jörgens, 2019. "Education for Sustainable Development and Climate Change Education: The Potential of Social Network Analysis Based on Twitter Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-15, October.
    10. Barbosa, Sergio & Sáiz, Patricio & Zofío, José L., 2024. "The emergence and historical evolution of innovation networks: On the factors promoting and hampering patent collaboration in technological lagging economies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(5).
    11. Anna Malinovskaya & Philipp Otto, 2021. "Online network monitoring," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 30(5), pages 1337-1364, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:7:y:2019:i:01:p:20-51_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/nws .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.