IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jinsec/v1y2005i02p175-191_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ideology, interest groups, and institutional change: the case of the British prohibition of wages in kind

Author

Listed:
  • TAN, ELAINE S.

Abstract

The new institutional economics has emphasized the importance of ideology in determining the content and direction of institutional change. Ideology can also determine when interest groups succeed in achieving legislative favor. The case of the regulation of in-kind wages in Britain shows that factors highlighted in mainstream political economy (such as interest group strength and organization, self-interest of legislators, and coalitional partners) were important. However, the interaction between relative price changes and social ideology was also significant in explaining the shape and timing of legislative changes. Changes in relative prices gave labor groups the incentive to seek legal protection from non-monetary wages, but they obtained protection only if they met certain criteria established by the prevailing ideology. Changes to that ideology resulted in further legislative changes granting cash wages to most industrial workers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tan, Elaine S., 2005. "Ideology, interest groups, and institutional change: the case of the British prohibition of wages in kind," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(2), pages 175-191, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:1:y:2005:i:02:p:175-191_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1744137405000135/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karim Khan, 2013. "Distributive consideration in institutional change: the case of Zia’s Islamization policy in Pakistan," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 139-165, June.
    2. Elaine Tan, 2011. "Scrip as private money, monetary monopoly, and the rent‐seeking state in Britain," Economic History Review, Economic History Society, vol. 64(1), pages 237-255, February.
    3. DEMPSTER Gregory & KLUVER Jesse, 2019. "Institutional Entrepreneurship In Health Management: A Survey Experiment On Appreciative Inquiry®," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 14(1), pages 34-50, April.
    4. Ruttan, Vernon W., 2008. "Induced Technical Change, Induced Institutional Change and Mechanism Design," Staff Papers 7050, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jinsec:v:1:y:2005:i:02:p:175-191_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/joi .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.