IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/entsoc/v4y2003i03p442-470_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sophisticates or Dupes? Attitudes toward Food Consumers in Edwardian Britain

Author

Listed:
  • French, Michael
  • Phillips, Jim

Abstract

In this article, we explore how reformers, manufacturers, and traders perceived British food consumers and the significance of those perceptions in debates about food quality and regulation. By considering basic commodities, our analysis extends a literature on consumption that is otherwise derived primarily from the study of luxury commodities, and it identifies conflicting images of the interests, competence, and concerns of early twentieth-century consumers. We find that discussions of appropriate policy involved competing interpretations of modernity and its implications for food consumers, and these discussions anticipated later twentieth-century debates.

Suggested Citation

  • French, Michael & Phillips, Jim, 2003. "Sophisticates or Dupes? Attitudes toward Food Consumers in Edwardian Britain," Enterprise & Society, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(3), pages 442-470, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:4:y:2003:i:03:p:442-470_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1467222700012672/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leisner, Jorgen J., 2005. "Weeds, heat and pure cultures - On the differential success of new technologies in the Danish and American creamery industries in the 1890s," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 419-433, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:entsoc:v:4:y:2003:i:03:p:442-470_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/eso .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.