IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/endeec/v4y1999i04p413-448_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The role of Polish environmental funds: Too generous or too restrictive?

Author

Listed:
  • ANDERSON, GLEN D.
  • ZYLICZ, TOMASZ

Abstract

In many countries, and particularly in the economies in transition in Central and Eastern Europe, public environmental funds play an important role in financing environmental investments. These funds provide subsidized financing through grants and soft loans in response to market failures that limit environmental investors' access to capital markets or poorly account for the benefits of environmental improvements. The principal question explored in the paper is whether environmental funds are too generous or too selective in co-financing environmental projects. The authors conducted a survey of applicants whose applications to Polish environmental funds were rejected following appraisal by the funds in 1994. Applicants were contacted to determine whether they had been able to close the financing 'gap' by the end of 1995 that had resulted from the rejection of their application by the Fund. Survey results indicate that a large majority of respondents have secured substitute gap financing and proceeded with their planned investments, suggesting that the fund's assistance was not essential for these projects to be implemented. Generally, the financing gap had been closed by financing from another environmental fund, from own resources, and less frequently from the same fund (after resubmitting a modified proposal). Only in few instances have proposed projects been abandoned.

Suggested Citation

  • Anderson, Glen D. & Zylicz, Tomasz, 1999. "The role of Polish environmental funds: Too generous or too restrictive?," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 413-448, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:4:y:1999:i:04:p:413-448_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355770X99000273/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ingmar Homeyer & Axel Klaphake & Hans-Dieter Sohn, 2001. "EU accession: Negotiating “environmental dumping”?," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 36(2), pages 87-97, March.
    2. Stavins, Robert N., 2003. "Experience with market-based environmental policy instruments," Handbook of Environmental Economics, in: K. G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (ed.), Handbook of Environmental Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 9, pages 355-435, Elsevier.
    3. Shuichi Ohori, 2006. "Optimal Environmental Tax and Level of Privatization in an International Duopoly," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 225-233, March.
    4. Tokunaga, Masahiro, 2020. "Regime Change and Environmental Reform: A Systematic Review of Research on Central and Eastern Europe," CEI Working Paper Series 2019-10, Center for Economic Institutions, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    5. Agnieszka Mazurek-Czarnecka & Ksymena Rosiek & Marcin Salamaga & Krzysztof Wąsowicz & Renata Żaba-Nieroda, 2022. "Study on Support Mechanisms for Renewable Energy Sources in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-38, June.
    6. Shuichi Ohori, 2006. "Environmental tax and trade liberalization in a mixed duopoly," KIER Working Papers 622, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    7. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:17:y:2006:i:5:p:1-9 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Shuichi Ohori, 2006. "Trade liberalization, consumption externalities and the environment: a mixed duopoly approach," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 17(5), pages 1-9.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:endeec:v:4:y:1999:i:04:p:413-448_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ede .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.