IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/buetqu/v23y2013i04p497-525_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Corporate Institutions in a Weakened Welfare State: A Rawlsian Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Blanc, Sandrine
  • Al-Amoudi, Ismael

Abstract

This paper re-examines the import of Rawls’s theory of justice for private sector institutions in the face of the decline of the welfare state. The argument is based on a Rawlsian conception of justice as the establishment of a basic structure of society that guarantees a fair distribution of primary goods. We propose that the decline of the welfare state witnessed in Western countries over the past forty years prompts a reassessment of the boundaries of the basic structure in order to include additional corporate institutions. A discussion centered on the primary good of self-respect, but extensible to power and prerogatives as well as income and wealth, examines how the legislator should intervene in private sector institutions to counterbalance any unfairness that results from the decline of the welfare state.

Suggested Citation

  • Blanc, Sandrine & Al-Amoudi, Ismael, 2013. "Corporate Institutions in a Weakened Welfare State: A Rawlsian Perspective," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 497-525, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:23:y:2013:i:04:p:497-525_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1052150X00005637/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Abraham Singer, 2023. "What Sal Owes Mookie: What Do The Right Thing and Mangrove Teach us About Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(3), pages 419-427, December.
    2. M. Paula Fitzgerald & Jeff Langenderfer & Megan Lynn Fitzgerald, 2020. "Is It Ethical for For-profit Firms to Practice a Religion? A Rawlsian Thought Experiment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 159-174, September.
    3. Michael Bennett, 2023. "Managerial Discretion, Market Failure and Democracy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(1), pages 33-47, June.
    4. Pierre-Yves Néron, 2015. "Egalitarianism and Executive Compensation: A Relational Argument," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(1), pages 171-184, November.
    5. Giuseppe Danese, 2017. "A social contract approach to sustainability," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 64(4), pages 327-339, December.
    6. Magali Fia & Lorenzo Sacconi, 2019. "Justice and Corporate Governance: New Insights from Rawlsian Social Contract and Sen’s Capabilities Approach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 937-960, December.
    7. Nuno Ornelas Martins, 2018. "Justice and the Social Ontology of the Corporation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 17-28, November.
    8. Abraham Singer, 2018. "Justice Failure: Efficiency and Equality in Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 97-115, April.
    9. Sandrine Blanc, 2014. "Expanding Workers’ ‘Moral Space’: A Liberal Critique of Corporate Capitalism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 120(4), pages 473-488, April.
    10. Klaser, Klaudijo & Pinar García, Lucía Desamparados, 2023. "Zero-rating and prioritization in Europe during the Covid-19 pandemic: a Rawlsian perspective on net neutrality," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Renato Peñaflor-Guerra & M. Victoria Sanagustín-Fons & Julianna Ramírez-Lozano, 2020. "Business Ethics Crisis and Social Sustainability. The Case of the Product “Pura Vida” in Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:buetqu:v:23:y:2013:i:04:p:497-525_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/beq .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.