IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/astinb/v48y2018i02p673-698_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systemic Risk: An Asymptotic Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Asimit, Alexandru V.
  • Li, Jinzhu

Abstract

Systemic risk (SR) has been shown to play an important role in explaining the financial turmoils in the last several decades and understanding this source of risk has been a particular interest amongst academics, practitioners and regulators. The precise mathematical formulation of SR is still scrutinised, but the main purpose is to evaluate the financial distress of a system as a result of the failure of one component of the financial system in question. Many of the mathematical definitions of SR are based on evaluating expectations in extreme regions and therefore, Extreme Value Theory (EVT) represents the key ingredient in producing valuable estimates of SR and even its decomposition per individual components of the entire system. Without doubt, the prescribed dependence model amongst the system components has a major impact over our asymptotic approximations. Thus, this paper considers various well-known dependence models in the EVT literature that allow us to generate SR estimates. Our findings reveal that SR has a significant impact under asymptotic dependence, while weak tail dependence, known as asymptotic independence, produces an insignificant loss over the regulatory capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Asimit, Alexandru V. & Li, Jinzhu, 2018. "Systemic Risk: An Asymptotic Evaluation," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 48(2), pages 673-698, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:48:y:2018:i:02:p:673-698_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0515036117000381/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tong Pu & Yifei Zhang & Yiying Zhang, 2024. "On Joint Marginal Expected Shortfall and Associated Contribution Risk Measures," Papers 2405.07549, arXiv.org.
    2. Li, Jinzhu, 2022. "Asymptotic results on marginal expected shortfalls for dependent risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 146-168.
    3. Li, Jinzhu, 2022. "Asymptotic analysis of a dynamic systemic risk measure in a renewal risk model," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 38-56.
    4. Yuan, Meng & Lu, Dawei, 2022. "Precise large deviation for sums of sub-exponential claims with the m-dependent semi-Markov type structure," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    5. Ji, Liuyan & Tan, Ken Seng & Yang, Fan, 2021. "Tail dependence and heavy tailedness in extreme risks," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 282-293.
    6. Takaaki Koike & Marius Hofert, 2019. "Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Estimating Systemic Risk Allocations," Papers 1909.11794, arXiv.org, revised May 2020.
    7. Zhangting Chen & Dongya Cheng, 2024. "On the Tail Behavior for Randomly Weighted Sums of Dependent Random Variables with its Applications to Risk Measures," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1-27, December.
    8. Chen, Yiqing & White, Toby & Yuen, Kam Chuen, 2021. "Precise large deviations of aggregate claims with arbitrary dependence between claim sizes and waiting times," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 1-6.
    9. Takaaki Koike & Marius Hofert, 2020. "Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Estimating Systemic Risk Allocations," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-33, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:astinb:v:48:y:2018:i:02:p:673-698_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/asb .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.