IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/apsrev/v57y1963i02p420-430_24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inter-Nation Influence: A Formal Model

Author

Listed:
  • Singer, J. David

Abstract

Students of international politics often state that power is to us what money is to the economist: the medium via which transactions are observed and measured. Further, there seems to be a solid consensus that power is a useful concept only in its relative sense; such objective measures as military manpower, technological level, and gross national product are viewed as helpful, but incomplete, indices. The concept does not come to life except as it is observed in action, and that action can be found only when national power is brought into play by nations engaged in the process of influencing one another. Until that occurs, we have no operational indices of power, defined here as the capacity to influence. In this paper, then, my purpose is to seek a clarification of the concept of power by the presentation of a formal, analytic model of bilateral inter-nation influence.

Suggested Citation

  • Singer, J. David, 1963. "Inter-Nation Influence: A Formal Model," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 57(2), pages 420-430, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:57:y:1963:i:02:p:420-430_24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0003055400240537/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Russell J. Leng & Hugh G. Wheeler, 1979. "Influence Strategies, Success, and War," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 23(4), pages 655-684, December.
    2. David A. Baldwin, 1971. "Inter-nation influence revisited," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 15(4), pages 471-486, December.
    3. Russell J. Leng, 1993. "Reciprocating Influence Strategies in Interstate Crisis Bargaining," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(1), pages 3-41, March.
    4. Martin Patchen, 1965. "Decision theory in the study of national action: problems and a proposal," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 9(2), pages 164-176, June.
    5. Manus I. Midlarsky, 1974. "Power, Uncertainty, and the Onset of International Violence," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 18(3), pages 395-431, September.
    6. Levy Sheldon G., 2001. "Psychology and the Study of Inter-Group Conflict," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 7(2), pages 88-121, April.
    7. Martin Patchen, 1970. "Discussions and Reviews : Models of cooperation and conflict: a critical review," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 14(3), pages 389-407, September.
    8. Patrick M. Regan, 1996. "Conditions of Successful Third-Party Intervention in Intrastate Conflicts," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(2), pages 336-359, June.
    9. James Meernik, 1999. "Force and Influence in International Crises," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 17(1), pages 103-131, February.
    10. Daniel S. Geller, 1990. "Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, and Crisis Escalation," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 34(2), pages 291-310, June.
    11. Gerald L. Sorokin, 1996. "The Role of Rewards in Conflictual International Interactions," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 40(4), pages 658-677, December.
    12. Susumu Suzuki & Volker Krause & J. David Singer, 2002. "The Correlates of War Project: a Bibliographic History of the Scientific Study of War and Peace, 1964-2000," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 19(2), pages 69-107, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:apsrev:v:57:y:1963:i:02:p:420-430_24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/psr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.