IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpp/issued/v24y1998i3p381-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economics versus Politics in Canadian Payroll Tax Policies

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan R. Kesselman

Abstract

In recent years the federal government has increased its reliance on payroll taxes. This approach is revealed most directly in Employment Insurance premiums but also emerges in planned increases for Canada Pension Plan premiums. Economic criteria support these moves to the extent that premiums are strongly linked to benefit entitlements. However, much of the EI and increased CPP premiums are unrelated to benefits and thus constitute general payroll taxes. Such taxes compare favourably in economic terms with some alternative taxes but are regressive when imposed with a ceiling on taxable earnings. These developments appear to be driven by political pressures rather than economic criteria. If the government is politically constrained from raising the rates of other, more visible taxes (such as income tax and GST), then the payroll tax changes may be economically optimal choices subject to the constraint. In the longer run, basic reform of the other taxes and reduced reliance on general payroll taxes would be desirable.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan R. Kesselman, 1998. "Economics versus Politics in Canadian Payroll Tax Policies," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 24(3), pages 381-387, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:24:y:1998:i:3:p:381-387
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0317-0861%28199809%2924%3A3%3C381%3AEVPICP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-D
    Download Restriction: only available to JSTOR subscribers
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louis Beauséjour & Munir A. Sheikh & Baxter Williams, 1998. "Experience Rating Employment Insurance Contributions," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 24(3), pages 388-393, September.
    2. Hettich, Walter & Winer, Stanley L, 1988. "Economic and Political Foundations of Tax Structure," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 78(4), pages 701-712, September.
    3. D. Peter Dungan, 1998. "The CPP Payroll Tax Hike: Macroeconomic Transition Costs and Alternatives," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 24(3), pages 394-401, September.
    4. Dungan, P., 1998. "The CPP Payroll Tax Hike: Macroeconomic Transition Costs and Alternatives," Papers 98-2, California Davis - Institute of Governmental Affairs.
    5. Stuart Landon & David L. Ryan, 1997. "The Political Costs of Taxes and Government Spending," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 30(1), pages 85-111, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jack M. Mintz & Thomas A. Wilson, 2001. "Taxes, Efficiency and Economic Growth," The State of Economics in Canada: Festschrift in Honour of David Slater, in: Patrick Grady & Andrew Sharpe (ed.),The State of Economics in Canada: Festschrift in Honour of David Slater, pages 95-133, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    2. Benny Geys & Jan Vermeir, 2008. "Taxation and presidential approval: separate effects from tax burden and tax structure turbulence?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 135(3), pages 301-317, June.
    3. Bharatee Dash & Angara Raja, 2014. "Do political determinants affect revenue collection? Evidence from the Indian states," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 61(3), pages 253-278, September.
    4. Tidiane Ly, 2018. "Sub-metropolitan tax competition with household and capital mobility," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(5), pages 1129-1169, October.
    5. Berliant, Marcus & Gouveia, Miguel, 2022. "On the Political Economy of Nonlinear Income Taxation," MPRA Paper 113140, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Goodspeed, Timothy J., 2002. "Tax competition and tax structure in open federal economies: Evidence from OECD countries with implications for the European Union," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 357-374, February.
    7. Bazart, C., 2001. "La complexité du processus institutionnel de décision fiscale : causes et conséquences," Cahiers du CREDEN (CREDEN Working Papers) 01.06.23, CREDEN (Centre de Recherche en Economie et Droit de l'Energie), Faculty of Economics, University of Montpellier 1.
    8. Michael A. Nelson, 2000. "Electoral Cycles and the Politics of State Tax Policy," Public Finance Review, , vol. 28(6), pages 540-560, November.
    9. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:8:y:2007:i:4:p:1-7 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Federico Revelli, 2013. "Tax Mix Corners and Other Kinks," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(3), pages 741-776.
    11. Dalibor Eterovic & Nicolas Eterovic, 2010. "Political Competition vs. PoliticalParticipation: Effects on Government's Size," Working Papers wp_006, Adolfo Ibáñez University, School of Government.
    12. Inman, Robert P. & Rubinfeld, Daniel L., 1996. "Designing tax policy in federalist economies: An overview," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(3), pages 307-334, June.
    13. Forest, Adam & Sheffrin, Steven M., 2002. "Complexity and Compliance: An Empirical Investigation," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association, vol. 55(N. 1), pages 75-88, March.
    14. Kelsey, Timothy W. & Smith, Stephen M. & Luloff, A.E., 1995. "The Impact Of An Aging Rural Population On Local Tax Structures," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 24(2), pages 1-11, October.
    15. Stanley L. Winer & Walter Hettich, 2002. "The Political Economy of Taxation: Positive and Normative Analysis when Collective Choice Matters," Carleton Economic Papers 02-11, Carleton University, Department of Economics, revised 2004.
    16. Stefan Wachter & Sebastian Galiani, 2006. "Optimal income support targeting," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 13(6), pages 661-684, November.
    17. De Donder, Philippe & Hindriks, Jean, 2003. "The politics of progressive income taxation with incentive effects," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(11), pages 2491-2505, October.
    18. Goel, Rajeev K. & Nelson, Michael A., 2007. "The Master Settlement Agreement and cigarette tax policy," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 431-438.
    19. Engelmann, Tobias & von Haldenwang, Christian & Sahler, Gregor & Elfert, Alice & Germain, Samuel & Stanzel Ferreira, Amelie, 2015. "The devolution of the land and building tax in Indonesia," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 89, number 89, July.
    20. Alberto Sole Olle, 1998. "The effects of tax deductibility on the mix of property taxes and use charges: an empirical analysis of the spanish case," Working Papers in Economics 41, Universitat de Barcelona. Espai de Recerca en Economia.
    21. Xavier de Vanssay & Zane A. Spindler, 1994. "Is Tax Reform in the Public Interest? a Rent-Seeking Perspective," Public Finance Review, , vol. 22(1), pages 3-21, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpp:issued:v:24:y:1998:i:3:p:381-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iver Chong The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Iver Chong to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cpp .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.