IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cpn/umkeip/v17y2018i4p433-442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving company’s environmental performance through Green Lean approach

Author

Listed:
  • Malgorzata Szymanska-Bralkowska

    (University of Gdansk)

  • Ewa Malinowska

    (University of Gdansk)

Abstract

Motivation: Green Lean (Lean and Green) approach is based on the lean method. As the literature and case studies show the Japanese quality improvement tools can be used in environmental management as well as in quality management. Companies that focus on sustainability may use those tools and methods to improve its processes and eliminate green waste at the same time. The research concentrates on the examples of the companies that started to implement the Green Lean (Lean and Green). The study shows interesting ways of minimalizing company’s negative impact on the environment by using Green Lean approach. Aim: The purpose of the article is to present how the application of Green Lean (Lean and Green) approach improves the environmental performance of the company and what are the benefits. Results: By identifying and eliminating the green waste i.e. in energy, materials, garbage, water, emissions, biodiversity, transportation researched companies are minimizing its negative impact on environment. As the research shows the employees should be motivated and involved in the process so does the management to make it work. Green Lean (Lean and Green) approach enables the companies to perform in profitable and sustainable way at the same time.

Suggested Citation

  • Malgorzata Szymanska-Bralkowska & Ewa Malinowska, 2018. "Improving company’s environmental performance through Green Lean approach," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 17(4), pages 433-442, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpn:umkeip:v:17:y:2018:i:4:p:433-442
    DOI: 10.12775/EiP.2018.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2018.031
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.12775/EiP.2018.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kainuma, Yasutaka & Tawara, Nobuhiko, 2006. "A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(1), pages 99-108, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhifeng Wu & Senjing Zhai & Jiangtao Hong & Yibin Zhang & Keren Shi, 2018. "Building Sustainable Supply Chains for Organizations Based on QFD: A Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-12, December.
    2. Ghobadian, Abby & Talavera, Irene & Bhattacharya, Arijit & Kumar, Vikas & Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo & O'Regan, Nicholas, 2020. "Examining legitimatisation of additive manufacturing in the interplay between innovation, lean manufacturing and sustainability," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C), pages 457-468.
    3. Chan, Chi Kin & Lee, Y.C.E. & Campbell, J.F., 2013. "Environmental performance—Impacts of vendor–buyer coordination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(2), pages 683-695.
    4. Vincenzo Formisano & Francesco Caputo & Raffaele D?amore, 2015. "Tratti evolutivi della societ? della conoscenza: il contributo degli studi sulle reti nella prospettiva sistemica," ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(2), pages 73-94.
    5. Caniato, Federico & Caridi, Maria & Crippa, Luca & Moretto, Antonella, 2012. "Environmental sustainability in fashion supply chains: An exploratory case based research," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 659-670.
    6. Kudla, Nicole & Stölzle, Wolfgang, 2011. "Sustainability Supply Chain Management Research," Die Unternehmung - Swiss Journal of Business Research and Practice, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 65(3), pages 263-301.
    7. Wu, Guo-Ciang & Ding, Jyh-Hong & Chen, Ping-Shun, 2012. "The effects of GSCM drivers and institutional pressures on GSCM practices in Taiwan’s textile and apparel industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 618-636.
    8. Chan, Chi Kin & Zhou, Yan & Wong, Kar Hung, 2019. "An equilibrium model of the supply chain network under multi-attribute behaviors analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 514-535.
    9. Amirkeyvan Ghazvinian & Bo Feng & Junwen Feng & Hossein Talebzadeh & Maria Dzikuć, 2024. "Lean, Agile, Resilient, Green, and Sustainable (LARGS) Supplier Selection Using Multi-Criteria Structural Equation Modeling under Fuzzy Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.
    10. Azevedo, Susana G. & Carvalho, Helena & Cruz Machado, V., 2011. "The influence of green practices on supply chain performance: A case study approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 850-871.
    11. Bazilian, Morgan & Rogner, Holger & Howells, Mark & Hermann, Sebastian & Arent, Douglas & Gielen, Dolf & Steduto, Pasquale & Mueller, Alexander & Komor, Paul & Tol, Richard S.J. & Yumkella, Kandeh K., 2011. "Considering the energy, water and food nexus: Towards an integrated modelling approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(12), pages 7896-7906.
    12. Wilson Kosasih & I Nyoman Pujawan & Putu Dana Karningsih, 2023. "Integrated Lean-Green Practices and Supply Chain Sustainability for Manufacturing SMEs: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    13. Mehdi Amini & Carol C. Bienstock & John A. Narcum, 2018. "Status of corporate sustainability: a content analysis of Fortune 500 companies," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1450-1461, December.
    14. Samaneh Shokravi & Sherah Kurnia, 2014. "A Step towards Developing a Sustainability Performance Measure within Industrial Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-22, April.
    15. Primiano Nauta & Biagio Merola & Francesco Caputo & Federica Evangelista, 2018. "Reflections on the Role of University to Face the Challenges of Knowledge Society for the Local Economic Development," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(1), pages 180-198, March.
    16. Ruey-Chyn Tsaur, 2020. "The Optimal Pricing Analysis for Remanufactured Notebooks in a Duopoly Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    17. Jiangtao Hong & Chaher Alzaman & Ali Diabat & Akif Bulgak, 2019. "Sustainability dimensions and PM2.5 in supply chain logistics," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 275(2), pages 339-366, April.
    18. David L. Olson & Scott R. Swenseth, 2014. "Trade‐offs in Supply Chain System Risk Mitigation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 565-579, July.
    19. Soomin Shin & Meehee Cho, 2022. "Green Supply Chain Management Implemented by Suppliers as Drivers for SMEs Environmental Growth with a Focus on the Restaurant Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-17, March.
    20. Sang-Bing Tsai & Min-Fang Chien & Youzhi Xue & Lei Li & Xiaodong Jiang & Quan Chen & Jie Zhou & Lei Wang, 2015. "Using the Fuzzy DEMATEL to Determine Environmental Performance: A Case of Printed Circuit Board Industry in Taiwan," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Lean Management; Green Lean; Lean and Green; environment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q5 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics
    • Q59 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpn:umkeip:v:17:y:2018:i:4:p:433-442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Miroslawa Buczynska (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.wydawnictwoumk.pl .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.