IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000520/018616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Desarrollo territorial y economía solidaria: análisis desde el concepto de desarrollo, el medio ambiente y la incorporación de las comunidades en una estrategia de desarrollo territorial

Author

Listed:
  • Llanez Anaya, Helmer Fernando

    (Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia)

  • Sacristán Rodríguez, Claudia Patricia

    (Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia)

Abstract

Este artículo propone un marco de análisis para articular el desarrollo territorial con la economía solidaria. Se considera que el desarrollo territorial tiene una relación cercana con la idea de crecimiento económico, pero también permite explorar posturas alternativas. En consecuencia, la economía solidaria es la mirada alternativa que se analiza para ofrecerle al desarrollo territorial otra aproximación distinta a la economía de mercado. Para este propósito, metodológicamente se hace un análisis de literatura desde tres dimensiones: la idea de desarrollo, el medio ambiente y las comunidades. A la par se analizan las principales aproximaciones tanto del desarrollo territorial como de la economía solidaria para explorar sus puntos de encuentro. Se encuentra que la economía solidaria tiene un marco de análisis que permite orientar estrategias de desarrollo territorial desde una perspectiva alternativa a la economía de mercado. Se concluye que el desarrollo territorial es un marco de análisis en construcción y por lo tanto puede nutrirse de los aportes de la economía solidaria. El artículo hace parte de un proyecto de investigación financiado por la Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia.

Suggested Citation

  • Llanez Anaya, Helmer Fernando & Sacristán Rodríguez, Claudia Patricia, 2021. "Desarrollo territorial y economía solidaria: análisis desde el concepto de desarrollo, el medio ambiente y la incorporación de las comunidades en una estrategia de desarrollo territorial," Revista Tendencias, Universidad de Narino, vol. 22(1), pages 254-278, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000520:018616
    DOI: 10.22267/rtend.202102.163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.22267/rtend.202102.163
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22267/rtend.202102.163?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberta Capello, 2018. "Cohesion Policies and the Creation of a European Identity: The Role of Territorial Identity," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(3), pages 489-503, April.
    2. -, 2019. "Planificación para el desarrollo territorial sostenible en América Latina y el Caribe," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 44731 edited by Cepal, September.
    3. Eric Bidet & Hyungsik Eum & Jieun Ryu, 2018. "Diversity of Social Enterprise Models in South Korea," Post-Print hal-02318571, HAL.
    4. Michael Hibbard & Kathryn I Frank, 2019. "Notes for a Substantive Theory of Rural Planning: Evidence from the US Experience," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 339-357, May.
    5. Daly, Herman E., 1990. "Toward some operational principles of sustainable development," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-6, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ettore Bompard & Daniele Grosso & Tao Huang & Francesco Profumo & Xianzhang Lei & Duo Li, 2018. "World Decarbonization through Global Electricity Interconnections," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-29, July.
    2. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Umlai, Mohamed, 2023. "ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. John R. Moodie & Viktor Salenius & Michael Kull, 2022. "From impact assessments towards proactive citizen engagement in EU cohesion policy," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(5), pages 1113-1132, October.
    4. Gheorghe Epuran & Bianca Tescașiu & Alina-Simona Tecău & Ioana-Simona Ivasciuc & Adina-Nicoleta Candrea, 2020. "Permaculture and Downshifting-Sources of Sustainable Tourism Development in Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Florian Fizaine, 2021. "La croissance verte est-elle durable et compatible avec l’économie circulaire ? Une approche par l’identité IPAT," Post-Print hal-03884377, HAL.
    6. Resce, Giuliano & Vaquero-Piñeiro, Cristina, 2022. "Predicting agri-food quality across space: A Machine Learning model for the acknowledgment of Geographical Indications," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Frank den Butter, Marjan W. Hofkes, 2001. "Endogenous technology and environmental quality in economic models," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 32-44.
    8. Hoff, Jens V. & Rasmussen, Martin M.B. & Sørensen, Peter Birch, 2021. "Barriers and opportunities in developing and implementing a Green GDP," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    9. Doreen Fedrigo-Fazio & Jean-Pierre Schweitzer & Patrick Ten Brink & Leonardo Mazza & Alison Ratliff & Emma Watkins, 2016. "Evidence of Absolute Decoupling from Real World Policy Mixes in Europe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Figge, Frank & Hahn, Tobias, 2004. "Sustainable Value Added--measuring corporate contributions to sustainability beyond eco-efficiency," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 173-187, February.
    11. Dolls, Mathias, 2024. "An unemployment re-insurance scheme for the eurozone? Stabilizing and redistributive effects," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    12. Tilman Santarius & Johanna Pohl & Steffen Lange, 2020. "Digitalization and the Decoupling Debate: Can ICT Help to Reduce Environmental Impacts While the Economy Keeps Growing?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Elisa Biagetti & Barbara Pancino & Angelo Martella & Ilenia Maria La Porta & Clara Cicatiello & Tommaso De Gregorio & Silvio Franco, 2023. "Is Hazelnut Farming Sustainable? An Analysis in the Specialized Production Area of Viterbo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-10, July.
    14. V.Martinet & L. Doyen, 2003. "Sustainable management of an exhaustible resource:a viable control model," THEMA Working Papers 2003-36, THEMA (THéorie Economique, Modélisation et Applications), Université de Cergy-Pontoise.
    15. Rennings, Klaus & Koschel, Henrike, 1995. "Externe Kosten der Energieversorgung und ihre Bedeutung im Konzept einer dauerhaft-umweltgerechten Entwicklung," ZEW Dokumentationen 95-06, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Jarmila Lazíková & Zuzana Lazíková & Ivan Takáč & Ľubica Rumanovská & Anna Bandlerová, 2019. "Technical Efficiency in the Agricultural Business—The Case of Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-17, October.
    17. Spash, Clive L. & Clayton, Anthony M. H., 1995. "Strategies for the maintenance of natural capital," MPRA Paper 38273, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. David F. Drake & Stefan Spinler, 2013. "OM Forum —Sustainable Operations Management: An Enduring Stream or a Passing Fancy?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 689-700, October.
    19. Maximilian Zarte & Agnes Pechmann & Isabel L. Nunes, 2022. "Problems, Needs, and Challenges of a Sustainability-Based Production Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    comunidades; economía alternativa; economía solidaria; desarrollo territorial; medio ambiente;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
    • P13 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Cooperative Enterprises
    • P40 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - General
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • R10 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000520:018616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Universidad de Narino (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fenarco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.