IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000438/019958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elementos para el diseno de un impuesto a alimentos y bebidas altos en sodio, grasas y/o azúcares en Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • María Angélica Arbeláez
  • Alejandro Becerra
  • Miguel Benítez
  • Ximena Cadena
  • María José Mejía

Abstract

Una amplia evidencia a nivel mundial muestra que las dietas altas en sodio, grasas saturadas y trans, y azúcares anadidos son factores de riesgo para el desarrollo de obesidad, enfermedades cardiovasculares y diabetes tipo II. Ello ha motivado que cerca de 50 países implementen “impuestos saludables” con el objetivo de desincentivar el consumo de ciertos productos altos en estos nutrientes, la mayoría siendo impuestos a bebidas azucaradas. A través de una revisión de la literatura sobre las experiencias internacionales en materia de “impuestos saludables” y estimando un modelo cuadrático de demanda (QUAIDS), este estudio analiza el potencial impacto que tendrían diferentes disenos de impuestos a alimentos y bebidas altos en sodio, grasas y/o azúcares en Colombia sobre (i) la ingesta de estos nutrientes, (ii) el recaudo tributario del gobierno y (iii) el ingreso disponible de los hogares en distintos niveles de ingreso. Los resultados refuerzan la idea de que Colombia debe implementar un impuesto que grave las bebidas y alimentos que tienen un alto contenido de sodio, grasas y/o azúcares. Por razones de administración tributaria, progresividad y simplicidad se propone que sea un impuesto ad valorem (%) sobre el precio de venta de los productos que, según la nueva norma de etiquetado, sean catalogados como altos en sodio, grasas saturadas y/o azúcares.

Suggested Citation

  • María Angélica Arbeláez & Alejandro Becerra & Miguel Benítez & Ximena Cadena & María José Mejía, 2021. "Elementos para el diseno de un impuesto a alimentos y bebidas altos en sodio, grasas y/o azúcares en Colombia," Coyuntura Económica, Fedesarrollo, vol. 51, pages 37-79, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000438:019958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11445/4211
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peggy J. Liu & Jessica Wisdom & Christina A. Roberto & Linda J. Liu & Peter A. Ubel, 2014. "Using Behavioral Economics to Design More Effective Food Policies to Address Obesity," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 36(1), pages 6-24.
    2. Jason M. Fletcher & David Frisvold & Nathan Tefft, 2010. "Can Soft Drink Taxes Reduce Population Weight?," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 28(1), pages 23-35, January.
    3. Nicoletta Berardi & Patrick Sevestre & Marine Tépaut & Alexandre Vigneron, 2016. "The impact of a ‘soda tax’ on prices: evidence from French micro data," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(41), pages 3976-3994, September.
    4. Ana Gil & José Molina, 2009. "Alcohol demand among young people in Spain: an addictive QUAIDS," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 515-530, June.
    5. Richard H. Thaler & Cass R. Sunstein, 2023. "Libertarian paternalism," Chapters, in: Cass R. Sunstein & Lucia A. Reisch (ed.), Research Handbook on Nudges and Society, chapter 1, pages 10-16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Julia Bronnmann & Jens-Peter Loy & Karen J. Schroeder, 2016. "Characteristics of Demand Structure and Preferences for Wild and Farmed Seafood in Germany: An Application of QUAIDS Modeling with Correction for Sample Selection," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(3), pages 281-300.
    7. Hunt Allcott & Benjamin B. Lockwood & Dmitry Taubinsky, 2019. "Should We Tax Sugar-Sweetened Beverages? An Overview of Theory and Evidence," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(3), pages 202-227, Summer.
    8. Abiodun Elijah Obayelu & V.O. Okoruwa & O.I.Y. Ajani, 2009. "Cross‐sectional analysis of food demand in the North Central, Nigeria," China Agricultural Economic Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 1(2), pages 173-193, January.
    9. Vecino-Ortiz, Andres I. & Arroyo-Ariza, Daniel, 2018. "A tax on sugar sweetened beverages in Colombia: Estimating the impact on overweight and obesity prevalence across socio economic levels," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 111-116.
    10. Nicole Darmon & Adam Drewnowski, 2015. "Contribution of food prices and diet cost to socioeconomic disparities in diet quality and health: a systematic review and analysis," Post-Print hal-01774670, HAL.
    11. Juan Carlos Caro & Shu Wen Ng & Ricardo Bonilla & Jorge Tovar & Barry M Popkin, 2017. "Sugary drinks taxation, projected consumption and fiscal revenues in Colombia: Evidence from a QUAIDS model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, December.
    12. Lisa Te Morenga & Jason M Montez, 2017. "Health effects of saturated and trans-fatty acid intake in children and adolescents: Systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Colchero, M.A. & Salgado, J.C. & Unar-Munguía, M. & Hernández-Ávila, M. & Rivera-Dommarco, J.A., 2015. "Price elasticity of the demand for sugar sweetened beverages and soft drinks in Mexico," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 129-137.
    14. Sharon S Nakhimovsky & Andrea B Feigl & Carlos Avila & Gael O’Sullivan & Elizabeth Macgregor-Skinner & Mark Spranca, 2016. "Taxes on Sugar-Sweetened Beverages to Reduce Overweight and Obesity in Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Reynolds, J.P. & Archer, S. & Pilling, M. & Kenny, M. & Hollands, G.J. & Marteau, T.M., 2019. "Public acceptability of nudging and taxing to reduce consumption of alcohol, tobacco, and food: A population-based survey experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Dariush Mozaffarian & Renata Micha & Sarah Wallace, 2010. "Effects on Coronary Heart Disease of Increasing Polyunsaturated Fat in Place of Saturated Fat: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-10, March.
    17. Roberto Steiner & Tomás Ramírez, 2019. "Análisis de experiencias de modelos asociativos como mecanismo para el desarrollo empresarial en la ruralidad," Informes de Investigación 17325, Fedesarrollo.
    18. Dengfeng Gao & Ning Ning & Congxia Wang & Yuhuan Wang & Qing Li & Zhe Meng & Yang Liu & Qiang Li, 2013. "Dairy Products Consumption and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-15, September.
    19. Lakkakula, Prithviraj & Schmitz, Andrew & Ripplinger, David, 2016. "U.S. Sweetener Demand Analysis: A QUAIDS Model Application," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 41(3), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis Fernando Mejía, 2022. "¿Qué hacer en política tributaria?," Libros Fedesarrollo 20237, Fedesarrollo.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joselin Segovia & Mercy Orellana & Juan Pablo Sarmiento & Darwin Carchi, 2020. "The effects of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages in Ecuador: An analysis across different income and consumption groups," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Zhang, Yinjunjie & Palma, Marco A., 2018. "Revisiting the Effects of Sugar Tax on Demand Elasticities - Evidence from the BLP Demand Model," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273978, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Goncalves, Judite & Merenda, Roxanne & dos Santos, João Pereira, 2022. "Not so sweet: The impact of the Portuguese soda tax on producers," Ruhr Economic Papers 938, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    4. Haeck, Catherine & Lawson, Nicholas & Poirier, Krystel, 2022. "Estimating consumer preferences for different beverages using the BLP approach," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    5. Christoph F. Kurz & Adriana N. König, 2021. "The causal impact of sugar taxes on soft drink sales: evidence from France and Hungary," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 22(6), pages 905-915, August.
    6. Ping Wang & Nhuong Tran & Dolapo Enahoro & Chin Yee Chan & Kelvin Mashisia Shikuku & Karl M. Rich & Kendra Byrd & Shakuntala H. Thilsted, 2022. "Spatial and temporal patterns of consumption of animal‐source foods in Tanzania," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(2), pages 328-348, April.
    7. Fabrice Etilé, 2019. "The Economics of Diet and Obesity: Public Policy," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) hal-02154445, HAL.
    8. Powell, Lisa M. & Jones, Kelly & Duran, Ana Clara & Tarlov, Elizabeth & Zenk, Shannon N., 2019. "The price of ultra-processed foods and beverages and adult body weight: Evidence from U.S. veterans," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 39-48.
    9. John Cawley & Michael Daly & Rebecca Thornton, 2022. "The effect of beverage taxes on youth consumption and body mass index: Evidence from Mauritius," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(6), pages 1033-1045, June.
    10. Sara Capacci & Olivier Allais & Celine Bonnet & Mario Mazzocchi, 2019. "The impact of the French soda tax on prices and purchases. An ex post evaluation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-22, October.
    11. Abay, Kibrom A. & Ibrahim, Hosam & Breisinger, Clemens, 2022. "Food policies and obesity in low- and middle-income countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    12. Maria Alessandra Antonelli & Valeria De Bonis & Angelo Castaldo & Alessandrao Gandolfo, 2022. "Sin goods taxation: an encompassing model," Public Finance Research Papers 52, Istituto di Economia e Finanza, DSGE, Sapienza University of Rome.
    13. Judite Gonçalves & Roxanne Merenda & João Pereira dos Santos, 2024. "Not so sweet: impacts of a soda tax on producers," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 31(5), pages 1388-1412, October.
    14. Rachel Griffith & Martin O'Connell & Kate Smith, 2017. "The Importance of Product Reformulation Versus Consumer Choice in Improving Diet Quality," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 84(333), pages 34-53, January.
    15. Echeverría, Lucía & Molina, José Alberto, 2021. "Poor vs Non-Poor Households in Uruguay: Welfare Differences from Food Price Changes," GLO Discussion Paper Series 890, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    16. Vall Castelló, Judit & Lopez Casasnovas, Guillem, 2020. "Impact of SSB taxes on sales," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    17. Hagenaars, Luc Louis & Jeurissen, Patrick Paulus Theodoor & Klazinga, Niek Sieds, 2017. "The taxation of unhealthy energy-dense foods (EDFs) and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs): An overview of patterns observed in the policy content and policy context of 13 case studies," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(8), pages 887-894.
    18. Bonnet, Céline & Coinon, Marine, 2024. "Environmental co-benefits of health policies to reduce meat consumption: A narrative review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    19. Dogbe, Wisdom & Revoredo-Giha, Cesar, 2022. "Industry levy versus banning promotion on soft drinks in Scotland: A distributional analysis," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    20. Violeta Chacon & Guillermo Paraje & Joaquin Barnoya & Frank J Chaloupka, 2018. "Own-price, cross-price, and expenditure elasticities on sugar-sweetened beverages in Guatemala," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-12, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Impuesto Pigouviano; Impuesto Saludable; Recaudo Fiscal;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E62 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook - - - Fiscal Policy; Modern Monetary Theory
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • H30 - Public Economics - - Fiscal Policies and Behavior of Economic Agents - - - General
    • I18 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - Government Policy; Regulation; Public Health

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000438:019958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Patricia Monroy (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fedesco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.