IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/col/000180/015150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contribución al desarrollo sostenible local de los proyectos MDL en el sector de generación eléctrica por biomasa: caso INCAUCA S.A

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Andrés Vergara Tamayo
  • Diana Carolina Ortiz Motta

Abstract

La declaración presentada por la comunidad internacional a mediados del siglo XX frente al reconocimiento del fenómeno del cambio climático, dio origen a propuestas de la comunidad para la creación de mecanismos orientados al control y a la reducción de sus causas. Una de estas propuestas es el Protocolo de Kyoto, el cual tiene por objetivo la reducción de los Gases Efecto Invernadero (GEI) causantes del calentamiento global. Dicho protocolo planteó tres iniciativas, pero, tan solo una de ellas involucra la participación de países en vía de desarrollo como es el caso de Colombia; se trata de los Proyectos de Mecanismo de Desarrollo Limpio (MDL). En este sentido, el objetivo de este documento es comprender los aportes en términos del desarrollo sostenible local, a partir de la metodología multicriterio AHP, para el proyecto MDL de cogeneración y sustitución de combustible del Ingenio del Cauca S.A., registrado ante la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas para el Cambio Climático (CMNUCC.) De este trabajo se concluye que no existe una diferencia importante entre la situación “con proyecto” y la situación “sin proyecto”, en otras palabras, la contribución al desarrollo social del Municipio de Miranda (Cauca), no está determinada por la puesta en marcha del proyecto MDL, sin embargo al analizar de manera global el ranking de las dos alternativas evaluadas es evidente que los actores involucrados prefieren la situación antes del proyecto que con este. ****** The statement made by the international community in the mid-twentieth century against the recognition of the phenomenon of climate change, led to proposals from the community to create mechanisms oriented to control and the reduce its causes. One of these proposals is the Kyoto Protocol, which aims at reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that cause global warming. This protocol outlined three initiatives, but only one of them involves the participation of developing countries as in the case of Colombia; they are the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) Projects. In this sense, the objective of this document is to understand the contributions in terms of local sustainable development, from the multi-criteria methodology AHP for the cogeneration CDM project and fuel substitution of Ingenio del Cauca SA, registered with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC.) this paper concludes that there is no significant difference between the situation "with the project" and the situation "without the project", in other words, the contribution to the social development of the Municipality of Miranda (Cauca), is not determined by the implementation of the CDM project, however comprehensively analyzing the ranking of the two evaluated alternatives is evident that stakeholders prefer the situation before the project than with it

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Andrés Vergara Tamayo & Diana Carolina Ortiz Motta, 2016. "Contribución al desarrollo sostenible local de los proyectos MDL en el sector de generación eléctrica por biomasa: caso INCAUCA S.A," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 24(2), pages 161-182, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:col:000180:015150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistas.unimilitar.edu.co/index.php/rfce/article/view/2218/2042
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Yongfu & Barker, Terry, 2012. "The Clean Development Mechanism and low carbon development: A panel data analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 1033-1040.
    2. Saaty, Thomas L., 2003. "Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 85-91, February.
    3. Alexander Cotte Poveda & Clara Pardo Martínez, 2013. "Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): an application for the industry," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 1315-1321, April.
    4. Fander Falconí & Rafael Burbano, 2004. "Instrumentos económicos para la gestión ambiental: decisiones monocriteriales versus decisiones multicriteriales," Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, Red Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, vol. 1, pages 11-20.
    5. Olsen, Karen Holm & Fenhann, Jørgen, 2008. "Sustainable development benefits of clean development mechanism projects: A new methodology for sustainability assessment based on text analysis of the project design documents submitted for validatio," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 2773-2784, August.
    6. Arturo Villavicencio, 2004. "Mitos y realidad del Mecanismo de Desarrollo Limpio," Revista Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, Red Iberoamericana de Economía Ecológica, vol. 1, pages 56-65.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pécastaing, Nicolas & Dávalos, Jorge & Inga, Andy, 2018. "The effect of Peru's CDM investments on households’ welfare: An econometric approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 198-207.
    2. Mori-Clement, Yadira, 2019. "Impacts of CDM projects on sustainable development: Improving living standards across Brazilian municipalities?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 222-236.
    3. Mandaloufas, Melissa & Lamas, Wendell de Queiroz & Brown, Scott & Irizarry Quintero, Anamari, 2015. "Energy balance analysis of the Brazilian alcohol for flex fuel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 403-414.
    4. Du, Yimeng & Takeuchi, Kenji, 2019. "Can climate mitigation help the poor? Measuring impacts of the CDM in rural China," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 178-197.
    5. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    6. Fang, Lei, 2022. "Measuring and decomposing group performance under centralized management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1006-1013.
    7. Nermin Kişi, 2019. "A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A’WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    8. Seyed Rakhshan & Ali Kamyad & Sohrab Effati, 2015. "Ranking decision-making units by using combination of analytical hierarchical process method and Tchebycheff model in data envelopment analysis," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 226(1), pages 505-525, March.
    9. Kun Chen & Gang Kou & J. Michael Tarn & Yan Song, 2015. "Bridging the gap between missing and inconsistent values in eliciting preference from pairwise comparison matrices," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 155-175, December.
    10. Yuan-Wei Du & Wen Zhou, 2019. "DSmT-Based Group DEMATEL Method with Reaching Consensus," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(6), pages 1201-1230, December.
    11. Jaraitė, Jūratė & Kurtyka, Oliwia & Ollivier, Hélène, 2022. "Take a ride on the (not so) green side: How do CDM projects affect Indian manufacturing firms’ environmental performance?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    12. Carmen Herrero & Antonio Villar, 2022. "Sports competitions and the Break-Even rule," Working Papers 22.13, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Economics.
    13. Attahiru, Yusuf Babangida & Aziz, Md. Maniruzzaman A. & Kassim, Khairul Anuar & Shahid, Shamsuddin & Wan Abu Bakar, Wan Azelee & NSashruddin, Thanwa Filza & Rahman, Farahiyah Abdul & Ahamed, Mohd Imra, 2019. "A review on green economy and development of green roads and highways using carbon neutral materials," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 600-613.
    14. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    15. Jiabin Liu & Ji Han, 2017. "Does a Certain Rule Exist in the Long-Term Change of a City’s Livability? Evidence from New York, Tokyo, and Shanghai," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-15, September.
    16. Watts, David & Albornoz, Constanza & Watson, Andrea, 2015. "Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) after the first commitment period: Assessment of the world׳s portfolio and the role of Latin America," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1176-1189.
    17. Abdelmonaim Okacha & Adil Salhi & Kamal Abdelrahman & Hamid Fattasse & Kamal Lahrichi & Kaoutar Bakhouya & Biraj Kanti Mondal, 2024. "Balancing Environmental and Human Needs: Geographic Information System-Based Analytical Hierarchy Process Land Suitability Planning for Emerging Urban Areas in Bni Bouayach Amid Urban Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-24, July.
    18. Zola, Fernanda Cavicchioli & Colmenero, João Carlos & Aragão, Franciely Velozo & Rodrigues, Thaisa & Junior, Aldo Braghini, 2020. "Multicriterial model for selecting a charcoal kiln," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    19. Pan Guo & Xiaofeng Li & Yanlin Jia & Xu Zhang, 2020. "Cloud Model-Based Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Entrepreneurs’ Uncertainty Tolerance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-14, September.
    20. David Grover & Swaroop Rao, 2020. "Inequality, unemployment, and poverty impacts of mitigation investment: evidence from the CDM in Brazil and implications for a post-2020 mechanism," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 609-625, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:col:000180:015150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Administrador (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/femngco.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.