IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v8y2023i4p99-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visually Impaired Persons and Social Encounters in Central Melbourne

Author

Listed:
  • Shirin Pourafkari

    (Department of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Australia)

Abstract

Urban spaces are areas where routes, activities, and people, including visually impaired persons (VIPs), intersect. Most urban research on VIPs focuses on wayfinding. However, the experience of urban spaces is not limited to utilitarian functions and also includes people’s lived experiences and random social encounters. To understand how a broader range of activities, experiences, and encounters may be better enabled, VIPs have participated in multi-method research including interviews, word games, walking interviews, and diary recordings in central Melbourne. Results not only indicate a broad range of unmediated conflicts between VIPs’ mobility needs and key aspects of intense street life but also reveal opportunities that are potentially hidden in random encounters in public spaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirin Pourafkari, 2023. "Visually Impaired Persons and Social Encounters in Central Melbourne," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 99-106.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v8:y:2023:i:4:p:99-106
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v8i4.6548
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6548
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v8i4.6548?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annette Bredmose & Sidse Grangaard & Victoria Linn Lygum & Anders Rhiger Hansen, 2023. "Mapping the importance of specific physical elements in urban space for blind and visually impaired people," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 139-154, March.
    2. Kim Dovey & Elek Pafka, 2020. "What is walkability? The urban DMA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(1), pages 93-108, January.
    3. Mervyn Horgan & Saara Liinamaa & Amanda Dakin & Sofia Meligrana & Meng Xu, 2020. "A Shared Everyday Ethic of Public Sociability: Outdoor Public Ice Rinks as Spaces for Encounter," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 143-154.
    4. Mervyn Horgan & Saara Liinamaa & Amanda Dakin & Sofia Meligrana & Meng Xu, 2020. "A Shared Everyday Ethic of Public Sociability: Outdoor Public Ice Rinks as Spaces for Encounter," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 143-154.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mervyn Horgan & Saara Liinamaa, 2023. "Entanglements of Improvisation, Conviviality, and Conflict in Everyday Encounters in Public Space," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 1-5.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shirin Pourafkari, 2023. "Visually Impaired Persons and Social Encounters in Central Melbourne," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 99-106.
    2. Robin James Smith & Jonathan Ablitt & Joe Williams & Tom Hall, 2023. "The Coining of Convivial Public Space: Homelessness, Outreach Work, and Interaction Order," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 42-51.
    3. Fletcher, James Rupert, 2024. "Re-municipalising sociospatial infrastructure: A journeying ethnography of Greater Manchester's dementia (un)friendly buses," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    4. Lise Mahieus & Eugene McCann, 2023. "“Hot+Noisy” Public Space: Conviviality, “Unapologetic Asianness,” and the Future of Vancouver’s Chinatown," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 77-88.
    5. Louise Sträuli, 2023. "Negotiating Difference on Public Transport: How Practices and Experiences of Deviance Shape Public Space," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 89-98.
    6. Mattias Kärrholm & Sandra Kopljar, 2020. "Built Environment, Ethics and Everyday Life," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 101-105.
    7. Javier Velázquez & Javier Infante & Inmaculada Gómez & Ana Hernando & Derya Gülçin & Fernando Herráez & Víctor Rincón & Rui Alexandre Castanho, 2023. "Walkability under Climate Pressure: Application to Three UNESCO World Heritage Cities in Central Spain," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, April.
    8. Jiayi Liu & Yanbin Li & Yanhan Xu & Castiel Chen Zhuang & Yang Hu & Yue Yu, 2024. "Impacts of Built Environment on Urban Vitality in Cultural Districts: A Case Study of Haikou and Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, June.
    9. Vitale Brovarone, Elisabetta & Staricco, Luca & Verlinghieri, Ersilia, 2023. "Whose is this street? Actors and conflicts in the governance of pedestrianisation processes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    10. Fernando T Lima & Nathan C Brown & José P Duarte, 2022. "A grammar-based optimization approach for walkable urban fabrics considering pedestrian accessibility and infrastructure cost," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(5), pages 1489-1506, June.
    11. Bondemark, Anders, 2023. "Walk this way how do individuals with different preferences for active travel modes respond to walkability?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Maja Rosi & Lora Strmsek & Dejan Dragan & Bojan Rosi, 2021. "Walkable Neighbourhoods In Smart Cities," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 21, pages 547-563.
    13. Jesús López Baeza & Julia L. Sievert & André Landwehr & Jonas Luft & Philipp Preuner & Jürgen Bruns-Berentelg & Ariel Noyman & Joerg Rainer Noennig, 2021. "CityScope Platform for Real-Time Analysis and Decision-Support in Urban Design Competitions," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 10(4), pages 121-137, October.
    14. Jônatas Augusto Manzolli & André Oliveira & Miguel de Castro Neto, 2021. "Evaluating Walkability through a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Approach: A Lisbon Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, January.
    15. Congying Fang & Riken Homma & Tianfu Qiu, 2024. "A Bibliometrics Analysis Related to the Built Environment and Walking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-17, March.
    16. Mattias Kärrholm & Sandra Kopljar, 2020. "Built Environment, Ethics and Everyday Life," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 101-105.
    17. Dalit Shach-Pinsly & Hadas Shadar, 2024. "The Public Open Space Quality in a Rural Village and an Urban Neighborhood: A Re-Examination after Decades," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-20, September.
    18. Duncan, Michael, 2023. "The influence of pedestrian plans on walk commuting in US municipalities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    19. Robin James Smith & Jonathan Ablitt & Joe Williams & Tom Hall, 2023. "The Coining of Convivial Public Space: Homelessness, Outreach Work, and Interaction Order," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 42-51.
    20. David Kostenwein, 2021. "Between walls and fences: How different types of gated communities shape the streets around them," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(16), pages 3230-3246, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v8:y:2023:i:4:p:99-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.