IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v8y2023i2p81-92.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Smart City and Healthy Walking: An Environmental Comparison Between Healthy and the Shortest Route Choices

Author

Listed:
  • Eun Jung Kim

    (Department of Urban Planning, Keimyung University, South Korea)

  • Youngeun Gong

    (Department of Urban Planning, Keimyung University, South Korea)

Abstract

Walking is a means of health promotion, which is one of the main features of smart cities. A smart city’s built environment can help people choose a healthy walking route instead of the shortest one. Our study investigated which environmental factors pedestrians who select healthy routes prefer and favored environmental factors in pedestrian navigation mobile applications. Survey data were collected from 164 residents in Daegu, South Korea, from October 12 to October 25, 2022. t and chi-square tests were used to compare perceptual differences between the healthy route and the shortest route preference groups. The results indicate that 56.7% of respondents preferred a healthy walking route over the shortest route. Pedestrians who chose the healthy route preferred to have less noise and more greenery along their commute and feel safer from traffic accidents and crimes than those who chose the shortest route. Moreover, people who favored healthy routes also considered the following environmental factors in pedestrian navigation mobile applications: (a) greenery and waterfront areas, (b) low traffic volume, and (c) safety from traffic accidents and crimes. The results suggest that urban planning and design policies support healthier and more active walking in smart cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Eun Jung Kim & Youngeun Gong, 2023. "The Smart City and Healthy Walking: An Environmental Comparison Between Healthy and the Shortest Route Choices," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 81-92.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v8:y:2023:i:2:p:81-92
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v8i2.6407
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/6407
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v8i2.6407?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Line, Tilly & Jain, Juliet & Lyons, Glenn, 2011. "The role of ICTs in everyday mobile lives," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1490-1499.
    2. Anna Visvizi & Shahira Assem Abdel-Razek & Roman Wosiek & Radosław Malik, 2021. "Conceptualizing Walking and Walkability in the Smart City through a Model Composite w 2 Smart City Utility Index," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Somin Lee & Myeong-Hun Lee, 2021. "Impact of Neighborhood Environment on Pedestrian Route Selection among Elementary Schoolchildren in Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin-Kyu Jung & Jung Eun Kang, 2023. "Smart Engagement and Smart Urbanism: Integrating “The Smart” Into Participatory Planning and Community Engagement," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 1-5.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eun Jung Kim & Youngeun Gong, 2023. "The Smart City and Healthy Walking: An Environmental Comparison Between Healthy and the Shortest Route Choices," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 81-92.
    2. Aguiléra, Anne & Guillot, Caroline & Rallet, Alain, 2012. "Mobile ICTs and physical mobility: Review and research agenda," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 664-672.
    3. Shahira Assem Abdel-Razek & Hanaa Salem Marie & Ali Alshehri & Omar M. Elzeki, 2022. "Energy Efficiency through the Implementation of an AI Model to Predict Room Occupancy Based on Thermal Comfort Parameters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-25, June.
    4. Ozbilen, Basar & Wang, Kailai & Akar, Gulsah, 2021. "Revisiting the impacts of virtual mobility on travel behavior: An exploration of daily travel time expenditures," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 49-62.
    5. Hamid Mostofi & Houshmand Masoumi & Hans-Liudger Dienel, 2020. "The Association between the Regular Use of ICT Based Mobility Services and the Bicycle Mode Choice in Tehran and Cairo," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Scheiner, Joachim, 2020. "Telekommunikation: Bedeutung von Virtualisierung und Digitalisierung für die Multilokalität," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Danielzyk, Rainer & Dittrich-Wesbuer, Andrea & Hilti, Nicola & Tippel, Cornelia (ed.), Multilokale Lebensführungen und räumliche Entwicklungen: ein Kompendium, volume 13, pages 147-153, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    7. Monika Bąk & Przemyslaw Borkowski, 2019. "Young Transport Users’ Perception of ICT Solutions Change," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-17, July.
    8. Ben-Elia, Eran & Alexander, Bayarma & Hubers, Christa & Ettema, Dick, 2014. "Activity fragmentation, ICT and travel: An exploratory Path Analysis of spatiotemporal interrelationships," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 56-74.
    9. Pietro Battistoni & Marco Romano & Monica Sebillo & Giuliana Vitiello, 2023. "Monitoring Urban Happiness through Interactive Chorems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    10. Sirong Chen & Rob Law & Shaogui Xu & Mu Zhang, 2020. "Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Mobile Technology in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-16, September.
    11. Ettema, Dick & Friman, Margareta & Gärling, Tommy & Olsson, Lars E. & Fujii, Satoshi, 2012. "How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 215-222.
    12. Pawlak, Jacek & Polak, John W. & Sivakumar, Aruna, 2017. "A framework for joint modelling of activity choice, duration, and productivity while travelling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 153-172.
    13. Lyons, Glenn & Hammond, Paul & Mackay, Kate, 2019. "The importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 22-36.
    14. Hamid Mostofi & Houshmand Masoumi & Hans-Liudger Dienel, 2020. "The Association between Regular Use of Ridesourcing and Walking Mode Choice in Cairo and Tehran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    15. den Hoed, Wilbert & Russo, Antonio Paolo, 2017. "Professional travellers and tourist practices," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 60-72.
    16. Watson, Matt, 2012. "How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 488-496.
    17. Hamid Mostofi, 2021. "The Association between ICT-Based Mobility Services and Sustainable Mobility Behaviors of New Yorkers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    18. Adrian Tanti & Dimitrios Buhalis, 0. "The influences and consequences of being digitally connected and/or disconnected to travellers," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    19. Jyoti Choudrie & Sutee Pheeraphuttranghkoon & Soheil Davari, 2020. "The Digital Divide and Older Adult Population Adoption, Use and Diffusion of Mobile Phones: a Quantitative Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 673-695, June.
    20. Imre Keseru & Cathy Macharis, 2018. "Travel-based multitasking: review of the empirical evidence," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 162-183, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v8:y:2023:i:2:p:81-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.