IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v7y2022i4p153-166.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inequitable Housing Practices and Youth Internalizing Symptoms: Mediation Via Perceptions of Neighborhood Cohesion

Author

Listed:
  • Richard C. Sadler

    (Division of Public Health, Michigan State University, USA / Department of Family Medicine, Michigan State University, USA)

  • Julia W. Felton

    (Center for Health Policy & Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, USA)

  • Jill A. Rabinowitz

    (Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA)

  • Terrinieka W. Powell

    (Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA)

  • Amanda Latimore

    (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA / Center for Addiction Research and Effective Solutions, USA)

  • Darius Tandon

    (Center for Community Health, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, USA)

Abstract

Disordered urban environments negatively impact mental health symptoms and disorders. While many aspects of the built environment have been studied, one influence may come from inequitable, discriminatory housing practices such as redlining, blockbusting, and gentrification. The patterns of disinvestment and reinvestment that follow may be an underlying mechanism predicting poor mental health. In this study, we examine pathways between such practices and internalizing symptoms (i.e., anxiety and depression) among a sample of African American youth in Baltimore, Maryland, considering moderation and mediation pathways including neighborhood social cohesion and sex. In our direct models, the inequitable housing practices were not significant predictors of social cohesion. In our sex moderation model, however, we find negative influences on social cohesion: for girls from gentrification, and for boys from blockbusting. Our moderated mediation model shows that girls in gentrifying neighborhoods who experience lower social cohesion have higher levels of internalizing symptoms. Likewise for boys, living in a formerly blockbusted neighborhood generates poorer social cohesion, which in turn drives higher rates of internalizing symptoms. A key implication of this work is that, in addition to standard measures of the contemporary built environment, considering other invisible patterns related to discriminatory and inequitable housing practices is important in understanding the types of neighborhoods where anxiety and depression are more prevalent. And while some recent work has discussed the importance of considering phenomena like redlining in considering long-term trajectories of neighborhoods, other patterns such as blockbusting and gentrification may be equally important.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard C. Sadler & Julia W. Felton & Jill A. Rabinowitz & Terrinieka W. Powell & Amanda Latimore & Darius Tandon, 2022. "Inequitable Housing Practices and Youth Internalizing Symptoms: Mediation Via Perceptions of Neighborhood Cohesion," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(4), pages 153-166.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:4:p:153-166
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v7i4.5410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/5410
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v7i4.5410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v7:y:2022:i:4:p:153-166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.