IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v6y2021i4p189-201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Accessibility in Urban Regeneration Areas: A Population-Weighted Method Assessing the Social Amenity Provision

Author

Listed:
  • Robin Gutting

    (Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Germany / Department of Geography and Environmental Studies, Stellenbosch University, South Africa)

  • Maria Gerhold

    (Faculty of Spatial Information, University of Applied Sciences Dresden, Germany)

  • Stefanie Rößler

    (Leibniz Institute of Ecological Urban and Regional Development, Germany)

Abstract

Principles of social sustainability serve to guide urban regeneration programmes around the world. Increasingly, the upholding of these principles is subject to qualified evaluation and monitoring. One of the cornerstones of social sustainability is access to basic services. This is also a strategic and operational objective in urban regeneration measures. While indicator-based evaluations of accessibility do exist, hitherto they have tended to apply descriptive statistics or density parameters only. Therefore, there is a need for small-scale, regularly updated information on accessibility, such as the nearest facility based on street networks and population density. This deficit can often be attributed to the complex methodological requirements. To meet this need, our article presents a method for determining the spatial accessibility of basic services with low data requirements. Accessibility is measured in walking time and linked to the local population distribution. More specifically, GIS tools in connection with land survey data are used to estimate the number of inhabitants per building; the walking time needed to reach four types of social amenity along the street network is then determined for each building; finally, a population-weighted accessibility index is derived and mapped in a 50-m grid. To test this method, we investigated four urban regeneration areas in Dresden, Germany. The results show that with freely available geodata, it is possible to identify neighbourhoods and buildings with both high population densities and poor accessibility to basic services. Corresponding maps can be used to monitor urban regeneration measures or form a basis for further action.

Suggested Citation

  • Robin Gutting & Maria Gerhold & Stefanie Rößler, 2021. "Spatial Accessibility in Urban Regeneration Areas: A Population-Weighted Method Assessing the Social Amenity Provision," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 189-201.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v6:y:2021:i:4:p:189-201
    DOI: 10.17645/up.v6i4.4425
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/4425
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/up.v6i4.4425?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark Del Aguila & Ensiyeh Ghavampour & Brenda Vale, 2019. "Theory of Place in Public Space," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 249-259.
    2. Benjamin Büttner & Julia Kinigadner & Chenyi Ji & Benjamin Wright & Gebhard Wulfhorst, 2018. "The TUM Accessibility Atlas: Visualizing Spatial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Accessibility to Support Regional Land-Use and Transport Planning," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 385-414, June.
    3. Mark Del Aguila & Ensiyeh Ghavampour & Brenda Vale, 2019. "Theory of Place in Public Space," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 249-259.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Katja Friedrich & Stefanie Rößler, 2023. "Built Space Hinders Lived Space: Social Encounters and Appropriation in Large Housing Estates," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(4), pages 145-161.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Robin Gutting & Maria Gerhold & Stefanie Rößler, 2021. "Spatial Accessibility in Urban Regeneration Areas: A Population-Weighted Method Assessing the Social Amenity Provision," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 189-201.
    2. Michael W. Mehaffy & Tigran Haas & Peter Elmlund, 2019. "Public Space in the New Urban Agenda: Research into Implementation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 134-137.
    3. Kain Glensor, 2018. "Development of an Index of Transport-User Vulnerability, and its Application in Enschede, The Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Xiaoqing Zhao & Junwei Pu & Xingyou Wang & Junxu Chen & Liang Emlyn Yang & Zexian Gu, 2018. "Land-Use Spatio-Temporal Change and Its Driving Factors in an Artificial Forest Area in Southwest China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Xiaoqian Sun & Sebastian Wandelt & Mark Hansen, 2020. "Airport Road Access at Planet Scale using Population Grid and Openstreetmap," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 273-299, March.
    6. Michael W. Mehaffy & Tigran Haas & Peter Elmlund, 2019. "Public Space in the New Urban Agenda: Research into Implementation," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(2), pages 134-137.
    7. Ana Condeço-Melhorado & Aura Reggiani & Javier Gutiérrez, 2018. "New Data and Methods in Accessibility Analysis," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 237-240, June.
    8. Mervyn Horgan & Saara Liinamaa & Amanda Dakin & Sofia Meligrana & Meng Xu, 2020. "A Shared Everyday Ethic of Public Sociability: Outdoor Public Ice Rinks as Spaces for Encounter," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 143-154.
    9. Freke Caset & David S. Vale & Cláudia M. Viana, 2018. "Measuring the Accessibility of Railway Stations in the Brussels Regional Express Network: a Node-Place Modeling Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 495-530, September.
    10. Silver, Kelli & Lopes, André & Vale, David & da Costa, Nuno Marques, 2023. "The inequality effects of public transport fare: The case of Lisbon's fare reform," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    11. Pereira, Mauro F. & Vale, David S. & Santana, Paula, 2023. "Is walkability equitably distributed across socio-economic groups? – A spatial analysis for Lisbon metropolitan area," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    12. Kinigadner, Julia & Büttner, Benjamin & Wulfhorst, Gebhard & Vale, David, 2020. "Planning for low carbon mobility: Impacts of transport interventions and location on carbon-based accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    13. Francisco Benita, 2022. "Associations Between Street Connectivity and Poverty," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 181-201, March.
    14. Pfertner, Maximilian & Büttner, Benjamin & Duran-Rodas, David & Wulfhorst, Gebhard, 2022. "Workplace relocation and its association with car availability and commuting mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    15. Ansam Saleh Ali & Salahaddin Yasin Baper, 2023. "Assessment of Livability in Commercial Streets via Placemaking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-66, April.
    16. Mervyn Horgan & Saara Liinamaa & Amanda Dakin & Sofia Meligrana & Meng Xu, 2020. "A Shared Everyday Ethic of Public Sociability: Outdoor Public Ice Rinks as Spaces for Encounter," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(4), pages 143-154.
    17. Pajares, Elias & Büttner, Benjamin & Jehle, Ulrike & Nichols, Aaron & Wulfhorst, Gebhard, 2021. "Accessibility by proximity: Addressing the lack of interactive accessibility instruments for active mobility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    18. Wubeshet Woldemariam, 2021. "Prioritization of Low-Volume Road Projects Considering Project Cost and Network Accessibility: An Incremental Benefit–Cost Analysis Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-15, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v6:y:2021:i:4:p:189-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.